2No. 09-2219chosen by the state legislature, U.S.
C
ONST
. art. I, § 3.“Judges of the supreme Court” were to be appointed bythe President, “by and with the Advice and Consent ofthe Senate.” U.S.
C
ONST
. art. II, § 2. Only the members ofthe House of Representatives were to be “chosen . . . by thePeople of the several States.” U.S.
C
ONST
. art. I, § 2.In 1913, the Seventeenth Amendment to the Constitu-tion effected a fundamental change in the legislative branch of government by providing for the direct electionof senators. The amendment also changed the rules forfilling vacancies in a state’s senatorial delegation. Underthe original Constitution, the executive authority of thestate could make a temporary appointment, whichwould last until the next meeting of the legislature. TheSeventeenth Amendment modified that process, toreflect the fact that, in principle, senators were to beelected by the voters. The relevant language is as follows:When vacancies happen in the representation of anyState in the Senate, the executive authority of suchState shall issue writs of election to fill such vacancies:
Provided
, That the legislature of any State may em-power the executive thereof to make temporary ap-pointments until the people fill the vacancies byelection as the legislature may direct.U.S.
C
ONST
. amend. XVII para. 2. That passage may lookstraightforward, but this appeal has demonstrated thatthere is more to it than meets the eye. We must decidewhether the system that Illinois is using to fill a famousvacancy in one of its senate slots has strayed so farfrom the mark that a preliminary injunction should
Case: 09-2219 Document: 23 Filed: 06/16/2010 Pages: 40
Add a Comment