- 3 -bank has uncovered concerning the possible criminal activity, including but not limited to:possible suspects, a description of the suspicious transactions and supporting documentation, anda complete and chronological account of the activity being reported. A blank SAR form isattached as Exhibit B.9.
Thus, in order for BB&T to defend itself in the Cleveland County Lawsuit againstthe plaintiff’s wrongful claims that BB&T withheld evidence from the government, BB&T mustbe able to introduce into evidence any SAR that it may have filed relating to the issues raised inthe Cleveland County Lawsuit, or else BB&T will suffer monetary damage.10.
The FDIC and FinCEN have issued regulations implementing the Bank SecrecyAct. 12 C.F.R. § 353.3; 31 C.F.R. § 103.18. Those agencies are responsible for overseeingBB&T’s obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act.11.
BB&T has requested in writing and in person that the FDIC and FinCEN permitBB&T to defend itself by disclosing any SAR that it may have filed relating to the issues raisedin the Cleveland County Lawsuit.12.
On April 2, 2008 Defendants issued a written decision formally denying BB&T’srequests.13.
The FDIC and FinCEN take the position that the filing of a SAR and its contentsare confidential under 31 U.S.C. § 5318(g)(2), 12 C.F.R. § 353.3(g), and 31 C.F.R. § 103.18(e).They claim this federal law prohibits BB&T from confirming or denying in this Complaint or inany other pleading the existence or contents of any SAR it may have filed.14.
Plaintiff BB&T disputes the Defendants’ position and asserts that 31 U.S.C.§5318(g)(2) and its implementing regulations impose no such restriction or, if they do, they denyBB&T Due Process of Law under the Constitution of the United States of America. However,
Add a Comment