- 1 -=================================================================This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision beforepublication in the New York Reports.-----------------------------------------------------------------No. 125In the Matter of Parminder Kaur,et al.,Respondents,v.New York State Urban DevelopmentCorporation, &c.,Appellant.--------------------------------In the Matter of Tuck-It-Away,Inc., et al.,Respondents,v.New York State Urban DevelopmentCorporation, &c.,Appellant.John R. Casolaro, for appellant.Norman H. Siegel, for respondents Tuck-It-Away, Inc. etal.Institute for Justice; Columbia University; East HarlemAlliance of Responsible Merchants; City of New York; BillPerkins; Ben Totushek, amici curiae.CIPARICK, J.:In this appeal, we are called upon to determine whetherrespondent's exercise of its power of eminent domain to acquirepetitioners' property for the development of a new ColumbiaUniversity campus was supported by a sufficient public use,benefit or purpose (see New York Const art I, § 7 [a]; Eminent