Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
eDNA: Fact Sheet

eDNA: Fact Sheet

Ratings: (0)|Views: 164 |Likes:
Published by Unlockourjobs
The facts surronding the limitations associated with eDNA evidence
The facts surronding the limitations associated with eDNA evidence

More info:

Categories:Topics, Art & Design
Published by: Unlockourjobs on Jun 24, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Fact Sheet:
The Limitations of eDNA ³Evidence´
A newly theorized and highly sensitive testing method called eDNA foundinconclusive evidence of Asian carp genetic material near the Great Lakes.During a one week kill and capture operation in May designed to verifywhether this genetic material indicated the presence of live Asian carpbeyond existing barriers, the Asian Carp Regional Coordinating Committeekilled and sorted 11,000 fish in the Little Calumet River. No Asian carp werefound.A lone Bighead carp was found during a separate routine monitoring effort in
June near Lake Calumet. The presence of this single fish does not validatethe continued use of eDNA.Still, politically motivated proponents of economically devastating lock
closure point to eDNA as scientific proof that existing barriers are notcontrolling the spread of Asian carp. There is simply no evidence that this is
true, nor do eDNA test results indicate the presence of a self-sustainingpopulation of Asian carp upriver of the barriers.
The Facts:
The µevidence¶ of carp is based on a test that, according to one of thebiologists who helped implement it, is so sensitive it is likely picking up onextremely insignificant incidences of fish ± such as genetic material ± ratherthan actual living Asian carp, much less sustaining or reproducing colonies.
S Army Corp of Engineers (
SACE) Major General John Peabody noted thateDNA testing has not yet undergone a complete scientific, independent peerreview, and therefore, any evidence that the electronic barrier has beenbreached is speculative.
(February 9, 2010,³Statement of Major General John Peabody, USACE´ , Subcommittee on Water Resources and  Development, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, U.S. House of Representatives)
The continued use of eDNA to justify lock closure is not acceptable. The
SACE¶s most report states that eDNA, ³as an emerging technology beingapplied in a field setting for the first time,
SACE cannot conclude that watersamples testing positive for eDNA evidence confirms the presence of Asian

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->