Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
5Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Bin More, The Origins of Fair Play

Bin More, The Origins of Fair Play

Ratings: (0)|Views: 27 |Likes:
Published by Jelena Jovanović

More info:

Published by: Jelena Jovanović on Jun 30, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/08/2010

pdf

text

original

 
Max Planck Institute of EconomicsEvolutionary Economics GroupKahlaische Str. 1007745 Jena, GermanyFax: ++49-3641-686868The
Papers on Economics and Evolution 
are edited by theEvolutionary Economics Group, MPI Jena. For editorial correspondence,please contact: evopapers@econ.mpg.deISSN 1430-4716
©
by the author
# 0614
The Origins of Fair PlaybyKen Binmore
 
 
The Originsof Fair Play
Ken BinmoreEconomics DepartmentUniversity College LondonGower StreetLondon WC1E 6BT, UK
 
The Origins of Fair Play
1
by Ken Binmore
All animals are equal but some are more equal than others.Orwell’s
Animal Farm 
1 Introduction
This lecture is a brief overview of an evolutionary theory of fairness. The ideasare fleshed out in a book
Natural Justice,
which is itself a condensed versionof an earlier two-volume book
Game Theory and the Social Contract 
(Binmore[14, 12, 13]).
2 How and why did fairness norms evolve?
My answer to the question
why? 
is relatively uncontroversial among anthropol-ogists. Sharing food makes good evolutionary sense, because animals who sharefood thereby insure themselves against hunger. It is for this reason that sharingfood is thought to be so common in the natural world.The vampire bat is a particularly exotic example of a food-sharing species.The bats roost in caves in large numbers during the day. At night, they foragefor prey, from whom they suck blood if they can, but they aren’t always suc-cessful. If they fail to obtain blood for several successive nights, they die. Theevolutionary pressure to share blood is therefore strong.The biologist Wilkinson [59] reports that a hungry bat begs for blood froma roostmate, who will sometimes respond by regurgitating some of the blood itis carrying in its own stomach. This isn’t too surprising when the roostmatesare related, but the bats also share blood with roostmates who aren’t relatives.The behaviour is nevertheless evolutionarily stable, because the sharing is doneon a
reciprocal 
basis, which means that a bat is much more likely to help out aroostmate that has helped it out in the past. Bats that refuse to help out theirfellows therefore risk not being helped out themselves in the future.Vampire bats have their own way of sharing, and we have ours. We call ourway of sharing “fairness”. If the accidents of our evolutionary history had ledto our sharing in some other way, it would not occur to us to attribute somespecial role to our current fairness norms. Whatever alternative norms we then
1
I am grateful to the Economic and Social Research Council and to the Leverhulme Foundationfor funding this work through the Centre for Economic Learning and Social Evolution at UniversityCollege London.
2

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->