High Quality
Open the downloaded document, and select print from the file menu (PDF reader required).
Posted on
v.
MacDonald
APPLICATION FOR EMERGENCY STAY AND/OR INJUNCTION AS TO THEsanctions
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ29839 Santa Margarita PkwyRancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688949-683-5411
ADDRESSED TO THE HONORABLE ASSOCIATE JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMASQuestions posed
1. Is a Federal Judge allowed to persecute a Civil Rights attorney and sanction her for merelybringing Civil rights violation cases to his court?2. Are members of US military reduced to the level of slaves or serfs, if they are refused ahearing on the merits of their grievances in both military and federal courts and their attorneysare harassed and intimidated and verbally assaulted and insulted by a presiding Federal Judge?3. Can a federal judge arbitrarily decide, what civil Rights violations case he wants to hear andwhich case he will not hear, and arbitrarily sanction a civil rights defender attorney for bringing
to court a case that he doesn’t feel like hearing on the merits, as it is not beneficial for his career?
4. Should a federal judge forward a case to the jury for determination on issues of fact and law,when a case involves a president of the United States, his legitimacy and eligibility, which bydefault, affects the career of such judge?5. Is the whole nation de facto reduced to the level of slaves or serfs, when one without validvital records, without Social Security number of his own and without a valid long form birthcertificate is able to get in the position of the President; and Congress is refusing to hear thisissue, claiming that it is for the courts to decide and the courts are refusing to hear this issue,claiming that it is for the Congress to decide?6. Can the courts indefinitely evade the issue of eligibility of US president, while endangeringthe well-being of the public?7. Should there be a decision from the Supreme court, clarifying legitimacy of US president or anorder to the lower court to hear the issue on the merits?
8. What Constitutes “natural born citizen” according to Article 2, Section 1 of the Cons
titution?
AFFIRMATION OF JURISDICTION
Applicant respectfully submit to this Honorable Court that she had brought this emergencyapplication directly from a final judgment from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Originalcase Rhodes v MacDonald 4:09-CV-106 was heard by US District Court Judge Clay D. Land(Hereinafter Land) in the middle District of GA (Exhibits1. 2, 3), Appeal in 11th circuit, Case #09-14698.(Exhibit 10)
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This emergency application is brought to this Honorable Court from a final decision of theHonorable Eleventh Circuit court of Appeals denying reversal of sanctions assessed against theapplicant by District Court Judge Clay D. Land in retaliation for her bringing to his courtroom asecond case on behalf of a member of US military officer questioning the legality of deploymentorders issued by Barack Hussein Obama, who refused to unseal any of his vital records andnever qualified as a legitimate President and Commander in Chief, based on Article 2, §1 of theConstitution of the United States of America.
Application for stay of sanctions
The appellant in this case is Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq, seeking a stay and reversal of the $20,000 Rule11 sanctions assessed against her by Judge Clay D. Land in the Middle District of GA. Rule 11sanctions are typically applied when the case is not sufficiently investigated by the counsel priorto bringing it to court. The facts of the underlying case
Rhodes v MacDonald
4:09-CV-106Middle District of GA were researched for a year. Licensed investigators were used, Taitz hasreached the highest ranks of the military in her investigation of the case.
It was not a case of anything improper done by the counsel, rather it was an attempt by judge Clay D. Land tosilence and intimidate Taitz, as well as other attorneys, an attempt to instill fear in eachand every attorney, who dared to bring an action on behalf of members of the US military
challenging Barack Hussein Obama’s complete illegitimacy for the US presidency.
She isseeking a stay and reversal of sanctions, as well as limited rule 11 discovery, to show that heractions were not frivolous, but rather reasonable and justified, that is not only not frivolous, butis the most important case today and possibly most important in US history
,
as sanctions were
asserted to obfuscate illegitimacy of Barack Hussein Obama for US presidency. Land’s order canonly be characterized as a legal “hit job”. Land really wanted to deter any further legal actions
against Obama. He started his order with a statement comparing Taitz to Alice in Wonderlandand saying that just saying so, does not make it so. Unfortunately, Land did not think of theunderlying case, where
Obama is saying
, that he is a legitimate President and Commander inChief, however in light of the fact that multiple experts show him using Social Security
numbersof others, not having a valid Social Security number of his own, not willing to unseal his original
Add a Comment
Jack Ryanleft a comment
Jack Ryanleft a comment
Reality Check 1776left a comment
funnyhaha71left a comment