Human Rights Alert
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
10-07-12 Complaint against US Magistrate Carla Woehrle and others at the US District Court,Central District of California – for Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights.
Andre Birotte Jr., US Attorney, Central District of California.221 N Figueroa St, Los Angeles, CA 90012By certified mail.By fax: 213-894-6269
TO US ATTORNEY, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA: Please accept instant Citizen’sComplaint by Joseph Zernik, PhD and Human Rights Alert (NGO) against the US Magistrate Carla Woehrleand others, named below, at the US District Court, Central District of California.
Los Angles, July 12 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) andJoseph Zernik, PhD, against US Magistrate Carla Woehrle and others at the US District Court, Central District of California, allegingpublic corruption and deprivation of rights under the color of law pertaining to their conduct in the cases of
Fine v Sheriff
Zernik v Connor et al
(2:08-cv-01550) at the US District Court – as part of cover up of alleged widespread corruption of the judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. The complaint alleged that Magistrate Carla Woehrle, US JudgesVirginia Phillips and John Walter, Clerk of the Court Terri Nafisi, Pro Se Clerk Chris Sawyer, and Courtroom Assistant Donna Thomasconspired to conduct in the two cases litigations, which were never deemed by the US Court itself as honest, valid, and effectual courtactions. Instead – they conducted pretense litigations.In
Fine v Sheriff
(2:09-cv-01914), former US prosecutor Richard Fine filed a petition for a writ for habeas corpus. Richard Fine wasarrested on March 4, 2009 in the court of Judge David, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, with no warrant at all. Hehas been held in solitary confinement ever since, with no judgment, conviction, or sentencing ever entered in his case.In
Zernik v Connor et al
(2:08-cv-01550), Joseph Zernik filed complaint alleging deprivation of rights by a group of judges of theSuperior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, who forced him to leave his residence under the threat of force, took his home forprivate use with no compensation at all, and conducted conveyance of title, which was opined by fraud expert of the highest reputationas real estate fraud. No judgment was ever entered in the case of Joseph Zernik at the Superior Court of California either, no writ ofexecution was issued, and the court distributed the proceeds of the sale in what was alleged as money laundering.Both Richard Fine and Joseph Zernik attempted to protect their rights by filing complaints at the US District Court, and both casesended up in the court of US Magistrate Carla Woehrle. The cases were presided by Judges John Walter and Virginia Phillips,respectively.
Conduct of named accused, detailed in the complaint, allegedly included, but was limited to:
Adulteration of commencing records in both cases;
2. Denial of plaintiff’s right to file papers in court, by eliminating paper from the dockets with no due process of law;3. Production of adulterated court dockets, by permitting conduct of numerous transactions in the dockets by unauthorized courtpersonnel;4. Conduct of fraudulent litigations, by permitting defendants’ counsel, who were not counsel of record, to appear and file falserecords with no authority at all;5. Fraud on plaintiffs, through the Issuing of minutes, orders, and judgments with no authentication at all, yet neverthelessfalsely publishing such void, not voidable judicial records in PACER dockets as “entered”, as if they required “full faith andcredit”;Conduct of the accused was alleged as deliberate perversion of justice, through pretense of judicial review. Conduct of the accused isfurther alleged as intended to cover up widespread corruption of the judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles,and therefore – public corruption, in and of itself.Consequently, Clerk of the Court Terri Nafisi repeatedly denied Dr Zernik access to court records in the two cases, in alleged violationof First Amendment rights. Moreover, to this date Clerk of the Court Terri Nafisi refuses to certify the dockets in the two cases asdockets, which were constructed pursuant to the authority of the clerk and the law of the United States.Furthermore, both Clerk of the Court Terri Nafisi and Chief Judge Audrey Collins refused to initiate corrective actions, as required bylaw, after being duly informed of the conduct detailed in the complaint.
Digitally signedby Joseph Zernik DN: cn=Joseph