Human Rights Alert
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net
Blog:
Scribd:
10-07-12 Complaint against US Magistrate Carla Woehrle and others at the US District Court,Central District of California – for Public Corruption and Deprivation of Rights.
Andre Birotte Jr., US Attorney, Central District of California.221 N Figueroa St, Los Angeles, CA 90012By certified mail.By fax: 213-894-6269
TO US ATTORNEY, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA: Please accept instant Citizen’sComplaint by Joseph Zernik, PhD and Human Rights Alert (NGO) against the US Magistrate Carla Woehrleand others, named below, at the US District Court, Central District of California.
Executive Summary
Los Angles, July 12 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) andJoseph Zernik, PhD, against US Magistrate Carla Woehrle and others at the US District Court, Central District of California, allegingpublic corruption and deprivation of rights under the color of law pertaining to their conduct in the cases of
Fine v Sheriff
(2:09-cv-01914) and
Zernik v Connor et al
(2:08-cv-01550) at the US District Court – as part of cover up of alleged widespread corruption of the judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. The complaint alleged that Magistrate Carla Woehrle, US JudgesVirginia Phillips and John Walter, Clerk of the Court Terri Nafisi, Pro Se Clerk Chris Sawyer, and Courtroom Assistant Donna Thomasconspired to conduct in the two cases litigations, which were never deemed by the US Court itself as honest, valid, and effectual courtactions. Instead – they conducted pretense litigations.In
Fine v Sheriff
(2:09-cv-01914), former US prosecutor Richard Fine filed a petition for a writ for habeas corpus. Richard Fine wasarrested on March 4, 2009 in the court of Judge David, Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, with no warrant at all. Hehas been held in solitary confinement ever since, with no judgment, conviction, or sentencing ever entered in his case.In
Zernik v Connor et al
(2:08-cv-01550), Joseph Zernik filed complaint alleging deprivation of rights by a group of judges of theSuperior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, who forced him to leave his residence under the threat of force, took his home forprivate use with no compensation at all, and conducted conveyance of title, which was opined by fraud expert of the highest reputationas real estate fraud. No judgment was ever entered in the case of Joseph Zernik at the Superior Court of California either, no writ ofexecution was issued, and the court distributed the proceeds of the sale in what was alleged as money laundering.Both Richard Fine and Joseph Zernik attempted to protect their rights by filing complaints at the US District Court, and both casesended up in the court of US Magistrate Carla Woehrle. The cases were presided by Judges John Walter and Virginia Phillips,respectively.
Conduct of named accused, detailed in the complaint, allegedly included, but was limited to:
1.
Adulteration of commencing records in both cases;
2. Denial of plaintiff’s right to file papers in court, by eliminating paper from the dockets with no due process of law;3. Production of adulterated court dockets, by permitting conduct of numerous transactions in the dockets by unauthorized courtpersonnel;4. Conduct of fraudulent litigations, by permitting defendants’ counsel, who were not counsel of record, to appear and file falserecords with no authority at all;5. Fraud on plaintiffs, through the Issuing of minutes, orders, and judgments with no authentication at all, yet neverthelessfalsely publishing such void, not voidable judicial records in PACER dockets as “entered”, as if they required “full faith andcredit”;Conduct of the accused was alleged as deliberate perversion of justice, through pretense of judicial review. Conduct of the accused isfurther alleged as intended to cover up widespread corruption of the judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles,and therefore – public corruption, in and of itself.Consequently, Clerk of the Court Terri Nafisi repeatedly denied Dr Zernik access to court records in the two cases, in alleged violationof First Amendment rights. Moreover, to this date Clerk of the Court Terri Nafisi refuses to certify the dockets in the two cases asdockets, which were constructed pursuant to the authority of the clerk and the law of the United States.Furthermore, both Clerk of the Court Terri Nafisi and Chief Judge Audrey Collins refused to initiate corrective actions, as required bylaw, after being duly informed of the conduct detailed in the complaint.
Digitally signedby Joseph Zernik DN: cn=Joseph
Zernik, o, ou,email=jz12345@earthlink.net, c=USDate: 2010.07.1203:42:03 +03'00'
Page 2/13 July 12, 2010TOC
The complaint requested that the US Attorney provide equal protection to the former US prosecutor Richard Fine and to Dr JosephZernik. The complaint further requested that the US Attorney conduct investigation in the matter and prosecute the accused, ifappropriate, to the full extent of the law.The complaint was copied to the United Nations and the US State Department, to the Honorable Dianne Feinstein - Senator fromCalifornia, and to the US Congress Judiciary Committees.
In April 2010, Human Rights Alert (NGO) filed complaint with the United Nations alleging widespread corruption of the justice system ofLos Angeles County, California, and refusal of the US government to take action to provide equal protection for the 10 million residentsof the county. The complaint was filed as part of the first ever Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights in the United States by theUnited Nations, scheduled for November 2010.
Table of Contents
1.Executive Summary 2.Table of Contents 3.Complaint 4.What did the experts say about the justice system in Los Angeles County, California? 5.Complainants 6.Accused 7.General claims 8.Complainants are not attorneys, neither are they represented by counsel in matters, which are subject of instant complaint. 9.Additional evidence and records are provided in records linked below, in respective court files, and in complaints previouslyfiled with the office of US Attorney, Los Angeles. 10.Both cases at the US District Court -
(2:08-cv-01550) - originatedfrom alleged widespread corruption of judges of the Superior Court of California, and deprivation of rights under the colorof law. 11. In both cases conduct of the accused at the US District Court amounted to a deliberate attempt to cover up corruption at theSuperior Court, and permit the alleged deprivation of rights at the State Court; Therefore conduct of the accused is allegedas public corruption, in and of itself.12.In both cases at the US District Court accused allegedly adulterated commencing records in order to undermine thelitigations from the start. 13.In both cases, accused denied plaintiffs at the US District Court the right to file papers by eliminating paper from thedockets, conduct which is alleged as deprivation of rights, in and of itself. 14.In both cases, accused permitted counsel, who were not counsel of record to appear and file records with no authority at all. 15.Accused issued minutes, orders, and judgments with no authentication at all, but nevertheless falsely published them inPACER Dockets as “entered”. 16.The accused permitted conduct of numerous dockets transactions by unauthorized court personnel. 17.Clerk of the Court Terri Nafisi repeatedly denied complainant access to court records in the cases referenced above, inalleged violation of First Amendment rights. 18.Clerk of the Court Terri Nafisi to this date refuses to certify the dockets as such that were constructed pursuant to theauthority of the clerk and the law of the United States.19.Therefore, it is alleged that the accused denied plaintiffs rights under the color of law, including, but not limited to: accessto the courts, due process of law, and equal protection under the law. 20.The Honorable Audrey Collins – Chief Judge and Terri Nafisi – Clerk of the Court, US District Court, Central District of California, refused to initiate corrective actions after being duly informed. 21.No valid court opinions and judgments was ever entered regarding conduct of the accused, only void, not voidable judicialrecords were published in false and deliberately misleading PACER dockets. 22.Alleged widespread corruption of the justice system in Los Angeles is drawing both national and international awareness. 23.Remedies are requested by the US Attorney, Central District of California, including, but not limited to equal protection of plaintiffs and all 10 millions who reside in Los Angeles County. 24.Request for due process in acceptance, acknowledgement, and review of complaints at the US Attorney Office, CentralDistrict of California. 25.Links
COMPLAINT
Complaint is filed against US Magistrate Carla Woehrle, US Judges Virginia Phillips and John Walter, Clerk of the Court Terri Nafisi, Pro Se Clerk Chris Sawyer and Courtroom Assistant Donna Thomas - for PublicCorruption and Deprivation of Civil Rights under the Color of Law, through the conduct of false anddeliberately misleading court actions in the cases of
Fine v Sheriff
(2:09-cv-01914) and
Zernik v Connor et al
(2:08-cv-01550) at the US District Court, Central District of California. Upon review of the facts as a whole,a reasonable person would conclude that the accused conducted under the two captions, referenced above,
Page 3/13 July 12, 2010TOC
pretense litigations, which were never deemed by the Court itself as a true litigation under the law of the US,and as required by ratified international law for a national tribunal for protection of rights. Through suchconduct the accused conspired to cover up conduct of judges of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, which is alleged as widespread corruption of the courts.Please also accept instant Citizen’s Complaint as a request for Equal Protection pursuant to the US and ratifiedinternational law of all 10 millions, who reside in Los Angeles County, California.
1. What did the experts say about the justice system in Los Angeles County, California?
•
"Innocent people remain in prison"
•
"...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the justicesystem that the Blue Panel Report recommends must be investigated relative tothe integrity of the system, have not produced anyresponse that we know of..."
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
•
"...judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for crimes they didnot commit."Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000)
•
"This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and police states...and judges must share responsibility when innocent peopleare convicted."Prof Erwin Chemerinsky, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000)
2. Complainants
Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, resident of Los Angeles County, CaliforniaMailing Address: PO Box 526, La Verne, California 91750Tel: 323-515-4583Fax: (preferred) 323-488-9697Email: (preferred) jz12345@earthlink.net
3. Accused
a) US Magistrate CARLA WOEHRLE b) US Judge JOHN WALTERc) US Judge VIRGINIA PHILLIPSd) Clerk of the US Court TERRI NAFISIe) Pro Se Clerk CHRIS SAWYERf) Courtroom Assistant DONNA THOMASAddress: US District Court, Central District of California312 N. Spring Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
4. General claims
Conduct of the accused in the captions, referenced above, included, but was not limited to:a) Commencing were allegedly adulterated by the Court;b) Counsel, who were not counsel of record were permitted to appear and file records with no authorityat all;c) Minutes, orders, and judgments were issued with no authentication at all, but were neverthelesspublished in PACER dockets as “entered”;d) Numerous transactions were conducted in dockets by unauthorized court personnel,e) The court denies access to court records, andf) The Clerk of the Court today refuses to certify the dockets as such that were constructed pursuant tothe authority of the Clerk and the law of the United States.
Search History:
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
p.
10-07-12 Complaint for Public Corruption against US Magistrate Carla Woehrle and Others at the US District Court, Central District of California s
Executive Summary
Los Angles, July 12 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against US Magistrate Carla Woehrle and others at the… (More)
Los Angles, July 12 – complaint was filed with US Attorney Office, Central District of California, by Human Rights Alert (NGO) and Joseph Zernik, PhD, against US Magistrate Carla Woehrle and others at the… (More)
2.5K
Reads
14
Readcasts
2
Embed Views
Recommended
More From This User
Notes
Load more
