construction (students, teacher, parents, experts, etc) and finally as a process of enculturation into the scientific practices of the wider society (Cobb et al. 1996).
The results of our research showed that students generally respond positively both to the introduction of History of Science (practical work with real materials) andto the learning environment that our project created (constructivist approach focusedon developing critical thinking). Our findings support that the use of aspects of History of Science: (a) creates instructional tools the use of which could improvescience teaching in classrooms by adopting a pluralistic methodology (formulatingquestions, seeking answers, interpreting data, problem solving, decision making anddeveloping arguments), (b) supports learning by conversing for discussing, arguingand building consensus among members of a learning community and (c) contributestowards students’ critical thinking development.
Blair, J. & Johnson, R. (1980).
.Interness, Cal: Edgepress.Binnie, A. (2001). Using the History of Electricity and Magnetism to EnhanceTeaching,
Science & Education
10, 379-389.Cobb, P. & Yacker, E. (1996). Sociomathematical Norms Argumentation andAutonomy in Mathematics,
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
458-477.Dreyfus, A. & Jungwirth, E. (1980). Students' Perceptions of the Logical Structure of Curricular as Compared with Everyday Contexts - Study of Critical ThinkingSkills.
64(3), 309-321.Ennis, R. (1987). A Taxonomy of Critical Thinking. In Baron, J. and Sternberg, R.(Eds.),
Teaching Thinking Skills
New York: Freeman.Facione, P. A. (1990a).
Critical Thinking: a Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations ("The Delphi Report").
Washington, D.C.: ERIC.Facione, P. A. (1990b).
The California Critical Thinking Skills Test - College Level:Technical Report #1 - Experimental Validation and Content Validity
. Inanonymous (Ed.). Washington, D.C.: ERIC.Facione, P. A. (1990c).
The California Critical Thinking Skills Test - College Level:Technical Report #2 - Factors Predictive of CT Skills
. In anonymous (Ed.).Washington, D.C.: ERIC.Facione, P. A. (2001).
Test Manual: The Test Of Everyday Reasoning - A Measure of Thinking Skills.
Millbrae, CA: Insight Assessment/The California Academic Press.Facione, P. A., Facione, N. C., Blohm, S. W. & Giancarlo, C. A. (2002).
Test Manual:The California Critical Thinking Skills Test (Form A, Form B, Form2000).
Millbrae, CA: Insight Assessment/The California Academic Press.Friedler, Y., Nachmias, R. & Linn, M. (1990). Learning Scientific Reasoning Skills inMicrocomputer Laboratories.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
27(2),173-191.Jungwirth, E. & Dreyfus, A. (1990). Identification and acceptance of a posterioricasual assertions invalidated by faulty enquiry methodology: An internationalstudy of curricular expectations and reality. In Herget, D. (Ed.),
More history and philosophy of science in science teaching
(pp. 202-11). Tallahassee, FL: FloridaState University.Jungwirth, E. (1987). Avoidance of logical fallacies: A neglected aspect of scienceeducation and science-teacher education.
Research in Science and Technological Education