~IXII if amount) legai interest Oi property in demand, not including interest and costs is less than $2,500.
"X" if amount, legal interest or property in demand. not induding interest and costs is $2,500 or more.
"X" if claiming other relief in addition to Dr in lieu of money or damages.
TO: Any proper officer; BY AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF CO~JNECTICUT1 you are hereby commanded to make due and legal service of this Summons and attached Complaint.
Address of court clerk where writ and other papers shall be filed (Number, street, town and zip code) (GG.S. §§ 51-346, 51-350)
235 Church Street, New Haven 06510
Telephone nu rnber of clerk (with area code)
( 203 ) 503-6800
Return Date (Must be a Tuesday)
August
3 .2010
Day --vear-
Month
'Xl Judicial District jAt (Town in '('hich writ is returnable) (C.G.S. §§ 51-346, 51.349)
~ G.A.
D Housing Session 0 Number: New Haven
For the Plaintiff(s) please enter the appearance of:
Case type code (See list on page 2)
Major: C Minor: 90
Name and address of attorney, law firm or plaintiff if self-represented (Number, street, town and zip coda) I Juris number (tp be entered by attorney only)
Perelmutter, Potash & Ginzberg, P.C. 046117
Telephone number (with area code) I Signature of Plaintiff (If self-represented)
(203 ) 888-2501
Number of Plaintiffs: 1 r Number of Defendants: 8 lIZ! Form JD-CV-2 attached for additional parties
Parties Name (Last, First, Middle Initial) and Address of Each party (Number; Street; P,O, Box; Town; State; Zip; Country, if not USA)
First Name: ~rasso. Susane O. P-01
Plaintiff Address:
Additional Name: P-02
Plaintiff Address:
First Name: Connecticut Hospice, Inc. D-50
Defendant Address: 100 Double Beach Road, Branford, CT 06405
Additional Name: Hurzeler, Rosemary J. D·51
Defendant Address: 11 Double Beach Road, Branford, CT 06405
Additional Name: Knight, Ronny J. 0·52
Defendant Address: 100 Double Beach Road, Branford, CT 06405
Additional Name: Goldfarb, David R. 0-53
Defendant Address: 100 Double Beach Road, Branford, CT 06405 Notice to Each Defendant
1. YOU ARE BEING SUED. This paper is a Summons in a lawsuit. The complaint attached to these papers states the claims that each plaintiff is making against YDU in this lawsuit.
2. To be notified of further proceedings, you or your attorney must file a form called an "Appearance" with the clerk of the above-named Court at the above Court address on or before the second day after the above Return Date. The Return Date is not a hearing date. You do not have to come to court on the Return Date unless you receive a separate notice telling you to come to court.
3. If you or your attorney do not file a written "Appearance" form on time, a judgment may be entered against you by default. The "Appearance" form may be obtained at the Court address above or at www.jud.ct.govunder"Court Forms."
4. If you believe that you have insurance that may cover the claim that is being made against you in this lawsuit. you should immediately contact your insurance representative. Other action you may have to take is described in the Connecticut Practice Book which may be found in a superior court law library or on-line at www:lud.ct.gov under "Court Rules."
, If you have questions a 'ut the Summons and Complaint, you should tal k to an attorney quickly. The Clerk of Court is not allowed to give advice on
legal questions. '
Name of Person Signing at Left Jeffrey D. Ginzberg, Esquire
Date signed 7/6/2010
Commissioner of the Superior Court Assistant Clerk
. , ..
IS Sumrpons IS SIgned
he sig -ng has been done so that the Plaintiff(s) will not be denied access to the courts.
is t responsibility of the Plaintiff(s) to see that service is made in the manner provided by law.
c. The Clerk is not permitted to give any legal advice in connection with any lawsuit.
d. The Clerk signing this Summons at the request of the Plaintiff(s} is not responsible in any way for any errors or omissions in the Summons, any allegations contained in the Complaint, or the service of the Summons or Complaint.
I certify I have read and Signed (Self-Represented Plaintiff) understand the above:
Date
For Court USe Only.
File Date
IV! Commissioner of the ~ Superior Court
Assistant Clerk
Date 716/2010
, ~'X" proper box)
(Page 1 of 2)
Docket Number
CIVIL SUMMONS CONTINUATION OF PARTIES
STATE OF CONNECTICUT SUPERIOR COURT
JD-CV-2 Rev. 4-97
FIRST NAMED PLAINTIFF (Last, First, Middle Initial) Grasso, Susane O.
FIRST NAMED DEFENDANT (Last, First, Middle Initial) Connecticut Hospice, Inc.
1. Connecticut Hospice, Inc, (hereinafter referred to as "CTHI") is a
corporation organized existing under the laws of the State of Connecticut as a non-
profit corporation the operation of which is governed by a board of directors. The
individual defendants are Rosemary J. Hurzeler, President and CEO, Ronny J.
Knight, Sr VP, David R. Goldfarb, Sr VP and CFO, Sandra J. Klimas, VP of Clinical
Services, Susan Flannigan, Assistant Dir of Home Care, Nancy Baranowski,
Supervisor of Residential Programs, and Michael Sweeney, RN. The individual
defendants are being sued in their individual capacity for actions taken under color of
authority granted by CTHI, but in excess of or in violation of such authority for
purposes of personal advantage within the "chain of command" of CTHI. 1
'ERELMUTTER. POTASH 8< GINZBERG. P.C.
ATTORNEYS &
:::OUNSELLORS AT LAW
11 BANK STREET
P.O. BOX 1
EYMOUR. CONNECTICUT
06483-0001
TEL (203) 888-2501 FAX (203) 888~7928
JURIS NUMBER 46117
It FACTS:
2. The plaintiff Susane Grasso (hereinafter referred to as "Ms. Grasso") was
employed by CTHI during the period of 1998 until April 10, 2010, and from
approximately 2000 to April 15, 2010 Ms. Grasso was the director of complementary
and alternative medicine and/or director of complementary therapy (hereinafter
"Director of CAM").
3. During the foregoing period Ms. Grasso received evaluations of 3.5 to 3.8
on an effective scale of 1-4, wherein 4 is the highest.
4. On September 3,2008 Ms. Grasso was injured in an automobile accident
unrelated to her employment. She suffered fractures to her pelvis and several
fractures to her ribs, one of which punctured her lung. She returned to work on
December 1, 2008.
5. On or about February 9,2009 Ms. Grasso was about to sit at her desk
when she was warned that the chair was broken. She pushed the broken chair to
the maintenance office area and put a big sign on it that read "BROKEN".
6. On or about February 17,2009 while Ms. Grasso sat at her desk chair it
collapsed beneath her. She fell to the floor on the same side that her ribs and pelvis
were injured in the automobile accident. She reported the incident to CTHI and was
placed on Workers' Compensation Disability until February 24,2009.
7. Ms. Grasso reported the incident to Occupational Safety and Health
Administration of the Department of Labor (OSHA) which ordered that the safety
2
'ERELMUTTER, POTASH & GINZBERG. P.C.
ATTORNEYS 8:
~OUNSELLORS AT LAW
11 BANK STREET
P.O. BOX 1
.EYMOUR. CONNECTICUT
06483-0001
TEL (203) 888-2501 PAX (203) 888-7928
JURIS NUMBER 46117
hazard be corrected. The order which should have been posted on the staff bulletin
board was instead posted at Ms. Grasso work cubical.
a_ On or about February 19, 2009 Ms. Grasso was asked by the defendant
Hulzeler to testify before the Joint House and Senate Cornmittee of the Connecticut
Legislator in favor of a bill requiring pain management training for nursing home
staffs. She did so in pain and with the aid of a cane.
9. On March 17,2009 Ms. Grasso reported to OSHA a second incident of a
defective chair which collapsed at a staff conference.
10. Following Ms. Grasso's reports to OSHA, Ms. Grasso's duties were
changed and she was transferred from the Hospice Inpatient Hospital (HIP) in
Branford to its out patient offices located in Shelton, Branford, Farmington, Norwalk,
and Wallingford.
11. Although her title and pay were not changed, Ms. Grasso was prohibited
from performing the duties of the Director of CAM, i.e, recruiting, training and
supervising volunteers and participating in regular interdisciplinary conferences to
coordinate the treatment of patients and those who care for them.
12. Ms. Grasso was also prohibited from treating patients, caregivers and
CTHl's staff as she had been doing previously.
.13. Following her transfer, Ms. Grasso was subjected to relentless and
severe pressure to quit by the individual defendants if she did not perform certain
useless tasks and continue to work under a hostile work environment as follows:
a) The phone at her regular HIP desk was put on a constant busy signal; 3
ERELMUTTER, POTASH & GINZEERG, p.e.
ATTORNEYS &
.OUNSELLORS AT LAW 11 SANK STREET
P.O. BOX 1
:YMOUR. CONNECTICUT 06483-0001
TEL (203) 888-250 I FAX (203) 888-7928
JURIS NUMBER 46117
b) She was frequently sent to nursing homes and/or homes for the aged to make "presentations" only to find nobody was told she was coming although she was told she was expected to her embarrassment and to the detriment of CTHI.;
II
c) She was repeatedly ordered to drive hundreds of miles to "drop ofF papers for no useful purpose;
d) When she as assiqned to the Shelton Outpatient Office, she was the only staff person who was denied a key to the office;
e) When presentations were arranged, she was told to make
representations about what services CTH I could offer which she knew
CTHI could not offer. She refused unless such order was given in
writing and so that the person giving the order could be contacted
when the representations could or would not be honored;
f) She was publicly harassed, humiliated, and stalked by the defendant,
Sweeney who was a New Haven Police Officer before he joined the
staff at CTHI. He tried frequently to intimidate Ms_ Grasso which sent a
warning message to her friends and colleagues.
14. The pressure, isolation and hostility became so severe that Ms. Grasso
filed a formal complaint to the Whistleblower Protection Program of OSHA claiming
that there was no rational or ethical basis for the way she was being treated and that
the treatment was in retaliation for filing the OSHA Complaints.
4
~R~~MUTT~R. POTASH 8< G!NZBERG. P.C.
ATTORNEYS 8:
;OUNSELLORS AT ~AW
11 BANK STREET
P.O. BOX 1
"YMOUR. CONN~CTICUT
064S3-0001
TEL (203) S8S-250 1 FAX (203) SS8-7928
.JURIS NUMBER 46117
15. On October 13, 2009 OSHA informed Ms. Grasso, through counsel, that
upon investigation it found" ... reasonable cause to believe a violation exists."
16. Pursuant to OSHA Whistleblower procedure, the investigator tried to
negotiate a settlement of the retaliation-discrimination complaint.
17. CTHI refused to agree to a settlement until the day before the OSHA
investigator threatened to issue subpoenas to CTHI and members of the "chain of
command" which would have required answers under oath.
18. The settlement agreement provided, in part, that GTHI"._.will not provide
Ms. Grasso any greater OR LESSER (Emphasis added) rights or privileges than any other employee of Hospice." That agreement confirmed her right to the protections
of the "Staff Handbook" including its grievance procedure and access to the
"continuing quality assurance (GQA) committee."
19. Ms. Grasso signed the agreement on January 26,2010 and sent CTHI a
"Signing Statemenf' dated February 2,2010. The defendant CTHI signed the
agreement on January 27,2010 but immediately violated and breached it.
20. OSHA closed its file and case upon receipt of a copy of the Agreement.
21. On February 4,2010, Ms. Grasso sent a "Notice of Breach" to the
defendant CTHI in an effort to avoid litigation and delay. It was ignored.
22. Formal notice of "Violation/Breach and Request for Remedy" was sent to
OSHA and CTHI on February 10, 2010 and February 18, 2010. They were ignored by the defendant CTHI.
5
ERELMUTTER,POTASH & GINZBERG, p.e.
ATTORNEYS 11:
:OUNSELLORS AT LAW 11 BANK STREET
P.O. BOX 1 ,YMOUR, CONNECT1CUT 064a3~000l
TEL (203) 888~2501 FAX (203) 8a8~792a
JURIS NUMBER 46117
II
23. On February 22, 2010, OSHA advised Ms. Grasso, through counsel, that
"it was ... will not enforce the Settlement Agreement executed on January 27, 2010,
between your client, Susane Grasso and CTHI because OSHA is not a party to the
Agreement. If you believe that Hospice violated the Agreement, you have to
determine the appropriate venue to enforce it." This action follows that advice,
FIRST COUNT
WHISLEBLOWER STATUTE VIOLATION (C.G.S.A §31-51m)
Paragraphs 1 through 23 above are hereby included in and made part of this
count.
24. CTHI, acting through its Board of Directors which had formal authority
and/or effective control over its operations, and the individual defendants, knew or
should have known that (a) the individual defendants acted under color of their
authority to discriminate and retaliate against Susane Grasso for reporting to OSHA
the dangerous condition which caused her Workers' Compensation compensable
injury; (b) Ms. Grasso was a victim of retaliation as set forth above; (c) CTHI had a
duty to inquire about the facts of the case and the role of individual defendants as set
forth above; (d) CTHI and its President/CEO, the defendant Hulzeler, breached the
agreement as set forth above; (e) CTHI and the individual defendants condoned the
retaliation as set forth above.
26. CTHI's actions and constituted a violation of §31-51 m of the C.G.S.A. for
which CTHI is liable for compensatory damages. 6
ERELMUTTER,POTASH B: GINZBERG, =.c.
ATTORNEYS & :OUNSELLORS AT LAW
1 i BANK STREET
P.O. BOX 1
~YMOUR. CONNECTICUT
06483-0001
TEL (203) 888-250 1 FAX (203) 888-7928
JURIS NUMBER 46117
SECOND COUNT
VIOLATION OF FIRST AMDENDMENT RIGHTS (C.G.S.A §31-51q)
Paragraphs 1 through 26 above are hereby included in and made part of this
count.
27. Ms. Grasso's complaints to OSHA and communications with the Quality
Control and Assurance Committee of CTHI as described above was the exercise of
her free speech in matters of pubic concern protected by the First Amendment of the
United States Constitution and § 3,4 and 14 of the Connecticut Constitution.
28. The exercise of these rights did not materially interfere with her duties to
CTHI, nor did it interfere with her job performance and working relationship with
CTHI. Rather her exercise of these rights was in accordance with her obligation to
CTHI as set forth in the 'Staff Handbook".
29. Ms. Grasso was penalized and ultimately forced to leave her employment
for her health as set forth above as a result of exercising her free speech rights.
30. Ms. Grasso seeks damages as set forth in C.G.S.A§31-51q.
THIRD COUNT
BREACH OF CONTRACT/SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Paragraphs 1 through 30 above are hereby included in and made part of this
count.
7
ERELMUTTER, POTASH & GINZBERG, P.C.
A TTORNEYS a:
~OUNSELLORS AT LAW
11 BANK STREET
P.O. SOX 1
~YMOUR. CONNECTlCUT
06483-0001
TEL (203) 886-2501 FAX 1203J 686-7926
JURIS NUMBER 46117
31. When CTHI signed the Settlement Agreement, as set forth above, it
bound itself to the terms of that agreement which were immediately breached and/or
violated as described above.
32. Ms. Grasso made reasonable efforts to notify CTHI of the breach in order
to carry out her duties under the agreement. The continuous harassment,
humiliation, and endless pointless driving to which she was subjected constituted a
constructive termination and breach of the Settlement Agreement for which she
seeks compensatory damages against CTHI.
FOURTH COUNT
BREACH OF CONTRACT/STAFF HANDBOOK
Paragraphs 1 through 32 above are hereby included in and made part of this
count.
33. The Staff Handbook of CTHI provides terms and conditions for a
grievance procedure and for a right and obligation of the part of staff members to
report to its Quality Assurance Committee any conditions which would constitute a
violation of the high standards which the Handbook proclaims all staff members are
bound to carry out.
40. Ms. Grasso's attempted to exercise the rights contained in the Staff Handbook. Had those rights been recognized and carried out much of the damages
suffered by Ms. Grasso could have been avoided. Ms. Grasso claims compensatory
damages.
8
ERELMUTTER. 'POTASH 8: GIN2;BERG. P.C.
ATTORNEYS E<
:OUNSELLORS AT LAW 11 BANK STREET
P.O. BOX 1
,YMOUR, CONNECTiCUT
06483-0001
TEL (203) 888-2501 FAX (203) 868-7928
.JURIS NUMBER 46117
II
FIFTH COUNT
NEGLIGENT INFLICTION OF
EMOTIONAL DISTRESS AND CONDONING OF WILLFUL AND WANTON MISCONDUCT AGAINST THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
Paragraphs 1 through 40 above are hereby included in and made part of this
count.
41. The individual defendants acted negligently and caused the plaintiff to
suffer emotional distress, The individual defendants in their actions to supposedly
help the plaintiff in doing her work negligently condoned willful and wanton
misconduct which intimidated staff members from having anything to do with Ms.
Grasso and which caused her to suffer emotional distress.
42. Ms. Grasso's written requests to the Human Relations Director of CTHI
make it clear that those who were responsible for addressing the conditions
described herein either chose to or were ordered to ignore the written requests.
SIXTH COUNT
INTENTIONAL INFLICTION
OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS! ALL INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
Paragraphs 1 through 42 above are hereby included in and made part of this
count.
43. The individual defendants conspired together to engage in a pattern of
harassment and infliction of emotional distress which they knew and or should have
9
ERELMUTTER, POTASH 8: GINZBERG, =.c.
ATTORNEYS 8:
:OUNSELLORS AT LAW
11 BANK STREET
P,O. BOX 1
oYMOUR, CONNECTICUT 06463-0001
TEL (203) 888-21501 FAX (203) 888-7928
JURIS NUMBER 46117
known would have an adverse impact on Ms. Grasso's emotional and physical
health and cause her to suffer emotional and physical damages.
44. The individual defendants engaged in this conduct in order to ingratiate
themselves with the upper levels of the "chain of command" which made it clear that
CTHI wanted to force Ms. Grasso out
45. For that intentional infliction of emotional distress each individual is jointly
and severely liable to Ms. Grasso for punitive damages to the extent the finder of fact
shall deem appropriate.
WHEREFORE, the Plaintiff claims:
1. Damages.
2. Punitive damages.
3, Such other relief as in equity pertains.
Hereof fail not, but due service and return make.
Dated at Seymour, Connecticut, this 6th day of July 2010.
THE PLAINTIFF
10
'ERELMUTTER, POTASH & GINZBERG, P.C.
ATTORNEYS &
:::OUNSELLORS AT LAW
11 BANK STREET
P.O. BOX 1
EYMOUR. CONNECT)CUT
06483-0001
TEL (203J 888-2501 FAX (203) 888-7928
JURIS NUMBER 46117
· ·
SUPERIOR COURT
RN DT:
AUGUST 3, 2010
SUSANE O. GRASSO
J.D. OF NEW HAVEN
vs.
· ·
AT NEW HAVEN
CONNECTICUT HOSPICE, INC., Rosemary J. Hurzeler,
Ronny J. Knight
David R. Goldfarb
Sandra J. Klimas
Susan Flannigan
Nancy Baranowski
Michael Sweeney
July 6, 2010
STATEMENT IN AMOUNT OF DEMAND
The amount in legal interest or property in demand, exclusive of interest and
costs is Fifteen Thousand ($15,000) Dollars or more.