Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Pirus Final Report

Pirus Final Report

Ratings: (0)|Views: 22 |Likes:
Published by Sergi Montes
PIRUS – Publisher and Institutional Repository Usage Statistics
PIRUS – Publisher and Institutional Repository Usage Statistics

More info:

Published by: Sergi Montes on Jul 17, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

07/17/2010

pdf

text

original

 
 
PIRUS
 – Publisher and Institutional Repository Usage Statistics
 
a PALS 3 project
Developing a global standard to enable the recording,reporting and consolidation of online usage statistics forindividual journal articles hosted by institutional repositories,publishers and other entities
(Publisher Metadata and Interoperability Projects 3) 
Final ReportJanuary 2009
Project Team:Tim Brody, University of SouthamptonRichard Gedye, Oxford University PressRoss MacIntyre, University of ManchesterPaul Needham, Cranfield UniversityEd Pentz, CrossRefSally Rumsey, University of OxfordPeter Shepherd, COUNTER (Project Manager)
1
 
 
Table of Contents
Page1. Acknowledgements…………………………………………………..32. Executive Summary…………………………………………………..33. Background…………………………………………………………….54. Aims and Objectives………………………………………………….65. Methodology……………………………………………………………66. Implementation………………………………………………………...77. Outputs and Results………………………………………………….168. Outcomes……………………………………………………………….179. Conclusions…………………………………………………………….1710. Implications……………………………………………………………1811. Recommendations……………………………………………………1912. References……………………………………………………………..1913. Appendices…………………………………………………………….20
2
 
 
1. Acknowledgements
This project has been funded by JISC under the auspices of the PublisherMetadata and Interoperability Projects 3 programme and we are most grateful forthis support. In particular we would like to express our thanks to Alastair Dunningfor his guidance on the project. It is also important to acknowledge the resourcesdevoted to this project by Cranfield University, Southampton University andBioMed Central in setting up and implementing the required tests, as well as theco-operation of the publishers and repositories who provided feedback on thedifferent scenarios.
 2. Executive Summary
The aim of PIRUS (
P
ublisher and
I
nstitutional
R
epository
U
sage
S
tatistics) was todevelop COUNTER-compliant standards and usage reports at the individualarticle level that can be implemented by any entity (publisher, aggregator,repository, etc.,) that hosts online journal articles and will enable the usage ofresearch outputs to be recorded, reported and consolidated at a global level in astandard way.The core objectives did not change as PIRUS progressed, but it becameapparent in the course of the surveys and desk research carried out in Phase 1 ofthe project that some of the proposed approaches would have to be modified totake into account the enormous variety of repository technical systems,organizations, management and content. One size does not fit all and more thanone approach will have to be offered to repositories if they are to produceCOUNTER compliant usage statistics at the individual article level. Differentscenarios were developed that will, the project team believe, allow the majority ofrepositories, as well as publishers, to provide COUNTER-compliant usagestatistics at the individual article level.The four main outputs of the project are:a. A proof-of-concept COUNTER-compliant XML prototype for an individualarticle usage report, Article Report 1: Number of successful full-textarticle downloads, that can be used by both repositories and publishers.
 
In principle this report could be provided for individual authors and forinstitutions. In practice, the individual author reports are much easier togenerate and are a realistic short-term objective, while the reports forinstitutions and other entities, such as funding agencies, will be morecomplex and should be regarded as a longer term objective.b. A tracker code, to be implemented by repositories, that sends amessage
either
to an external party that is responsible for creating andconsolidating the usage statistics and for forwarding them to the relevantpublisher for consolidation
or
to the local repository server.c. A range of Scenarios for the creation, recording and consolidation ofindividual article usage statistics that will cover the majority of currentrepository installations . Each repository may select the scenario thatcorresponds to their technology and implementation.d. Specifying criteria for a central facility that will create the usage statisticswhere required ( for some categories of repository) and collect andconsolidate the usage statistics for others
3

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->