Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
5Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Government Whore Sheri Polster Chappell on Trial

Government Whore Sheri Polster Chappell on Trial

Ratings: (0)|Views: 179|Likes:
Published by Judicial_Fraud
CORRUPTION IN U.S. COURTS
CORRUPTION IN U.S. COURTS

More info:

Published by: Judicial_Fraud on Jul 19, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/23/2014

pdf

text

original

 
DEFENDANT SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELLRECORD LACK OF
 IMMUNITY 
- PERPETRATION OF ILLEGAL ACTS
1. The Plaintiff public corruption victims are suing Defendant corrupt U.S. Magistrate JudgeSheri Polster Chappell (“Chappell”) in her 
private individual capacity
and official capacity.Defendant Chappell’s criminal and unlawful acts on record were outside any
immunity
and
official 
capacity.
 
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND COMMUNICATIONS OF CRIME INFORMATION
 2. Maliciously, Defendant Chappell
obstructed
and
prevented
Plaintiffs’ communications of 
crime information
relating to the recorded commission of 
felonies
by, e.g., Defendant
Forger
K. M. Wilkinson, and Defendant Attorneys Jack N. Peterson and Sherri L. Johnson.
ALTERATION, DESTRUCTION, AND CONCEALMENT OF PUBLIC RECORDS
3. With
corrupt intent
to obtain a benefit, Defendant Corrupt Chappell illegally
altered
,
destroyed
and/or 
concealed
public records. In particular, Chappell practiced the record policy and custom of having Plaintiffs’ pleadings
disappear
from the Docket after they had been filed.
 
FALSIFICATIONS OF “
lien
4. With
corrupt
 
intent
to obtain unlawful benefits, Defendant Crooked Chappell
falsified
a
lien
” in the record absence of any mandated “judgment” “received” by this Court in Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228. Because of the lack of any recorded “
 judgment 
”, nothing could have
 possibly
become a “
lien
”. See § 55.10, Fla. Stat.
 
FALSIFICATION OF “
ORDERS 
5. Crooked Chappell falsified
motions
” and “
orders
”. E.g., on
02/01/10
, Corrupt Chappell
falsified
a “
motion
 
 for 
 
 sanctions for Busse’s pursuit of a frivolous appeal 
”, Doc. # 424, Case
 
 2 No. 2:2007-cv-00228. Defendant Whore Chappell knew and fraudulently concealed that Def.
Forger
Wilkinson had never 
 filed 
any “
motion for sanctions for a frivolous appeal 
”,Fed.R.Civ.P. 38. Corrupt Chappell
concealed
that any time to file the
non-existent
 Rule 38motion
” had
expired
on
08/08/2009
. See 11
th
Cir. R. 38-1 and Dockets.
CAUSING OTHERS TO FALSIFY OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS
6.
On or around 02/01/10
, Def. Corrupt Chappell
caused
the Co-Defendant Clerk of this Courtto
falsify
an official document and “
issue
” a facially fraudulent “
writ of execution
”, Doc. #424, p. 2, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228. In said bogus “order”, Def. Chappell brazenly
falsified
:“The motion was referred to this Court by the District Court on January 26, 2009.”
INTIMIDATION, HARASSMENT, AND OBSTRUCTION OF ADJUDICATION
7. Def.
Forger
Wilkinson’s
forgeries
of
land parcels
”, which neither Corrupt Chappell nor anyone else could
 possibly
find on the 1912 “Cayo Costa” Plat of Survey, PB 3 PG 25, were
fully supported
by the law. Whore Chappell’s “
order 
”, Doc.# 424, was without any “
legal merit 
” and for record
improper
purposes such as, e.g., to
harass
,
intimidate
, and
threaten
 the Plaintiffs and to
cause unnecessary delay
and
needlessly increase
the cost of litigation.
CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE & PERPETRATE FRAUD ON COURT
8. Any
 Rule 27-4 motion
” would
have had to appear
on the official Docket but never 
did 
.Any “
 Rule 27-4 motion
” would have
required
the following but never 
did 
:“(2) Contents of a Motion.(A)
Grounds
and relief sought. A motion
must state with particularity the grounds
 
 
for the motion, the
relief 
sought, and the
legal argument necessary
to support it.(B) Accompanying documents.
 
 3(i) Any affidavit or other paper necessary to support a motion
must be served andfiled with the motion
.(ii) An affidavit must contain
only factual information
, not legal argument.(iii) A motion seeking substantive relief must include a copy of the trial court’sopinion or agency’s decision as a separate exhibit.”
 
9. Crooked Chappell
concealed
that Def. Forger Wilkinsona. Never
 stated 
” any “
 grounds
” and “
legal argument necessary
”; b.
Forged
, e.g., “
land parcels
”, maps;c.
Falsified
real property data
” to
extort
property worth Hundreds of Millions of Dollarsin 2007.
CONSPIRACY TO COERCE & EXTORT
10. Corrupt Chappell
conspired
with Defendant
Forger
Wilkinson to expressly “
discourage
and
coerce
Plaintiffs to refrain from prosecuting and communicating the commission of felonies by Government Officials and to
extort
:
 
“5. In order to
discourage
the Appellant from engaging in the same practices in thisCourt, the Appellee would respectfully request that this Court require the Appellant to pay a monetary penalty into the Court for filing his frivolous motion to strike.” SeeCase No. 2:2007-cv-00228, Doc. # 386-2, p. 2.
FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF PAID “
$24.30
” JUDGMENT
 11. Corrupt Chappell fraudulently
concealed
the
paid
$24.30
 judgment 
issued as mandateon 06/11/2009
” in Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, Fed.R.App.P. 39.
FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION OF “
 BILL OF COST 
 

Activity (5)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 thousand reads
1 hundred reads
thedoctor2001 liked this
Judicial_Fraud liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->