F.B.I.

PUBLIC CORRUPTION COMPLAINT

AGAINST DEFENDANT U.S. MARSHAL RYAN BARRY

CERTIFIED DELIVERY
Federal Bureau of Investigation
5525 West Gray Street
Tampa, FL 33609
Phone: (813) 253-1000

DEFENDANT RYAN BARRY

RECORD LACK OF IMMUNITY - PERPETRATION OF UNLAWFUL ACTS

1. The Plaintiff public corruption victims are suing Ryan Barry in his private individual

capacity and official capacity as Supervising U.S. Deputy Marshal, Fort Myers, FL.

Defendant Barry’s criminal and unlawful acts on record were outside any immunity and

official capacity.

FRAUDULENT CONCEALMENT OF WRIT OF EXECUTION-EXTORTION-SCHEME

2. Defendant Ryan Barry knew and fraudulently concealed that no authentic and genuine

“writ of execution” had ever existed or been “issued”. Barry knew that on the face of a sham

“writ”, no judge could possibly be identified.

CONSPIRACY TO FALSIFY OFFICIAL DOCUMENT

3. Defendant Barry conspired with other Officials and Defendants to falsify official records. In

the record absence of any genuine and valid “writ of execution”, Def. Supervisor Barry

refused to correct the fraudulent acts on the record and prevent further harm. With corrupt

intent to obtain illegal benefits, Def. Barry deliberately deprived the Plaintiffs of their

express fundamental rights and Constitutional guarantees to own property, exclude

Government, and be free of Government corruption, extortion, and illegal seizures.

 CONSPIRACY TO INTIMIDATE AND RETALIATE AGAINST PLAINTIFFS

4. Because the Plaintiff public corruption victims had previously sued Richard Jessup, U.S.

Deputy Marshal, Defendant R. Barry agreed with other Officials to intimidate and retaliate

against the Plaintiff record landowners. Def. Barry conspired with other Government

Officials and Defendants to intimidate, harass, and coerce the Plaintiffs to refrain from

prosecuting and reporting the record public corruption in the U.S. District and Circuit Court.

CONSPIRACY TO EXTORT PROPERTY UNDER FRAUDULENT PRETENSES

5. Under fraudulent pretenses of a facially forged “writ of execution”, Def. Barry conspired

with other Officials to extort Plaintiffs’ property without any justifying “judgment” or any

other explanation and due process. When Plaintiffs notified Def. Barry and proved the fraud

on the record, Barry expressly stated that he did not care.

PATTERN AND POLICY OF THREATS AND COERCION

6. Previously under Def. Barry’s reported supervision, Co-Defendant Richard Jessup had

threatened Jennifer Franklin Prescott and Dr. Jorg Busse in Naples, Florida, in the presence

of a witnessing family member (B. P.).

7. Even though the Plaintiffs had filed police reports and complained about Co-Defendant

Richard Jessup’s coercion and threats, Jessup continued to harass and intimidate the

Plaintiffs. In particular, Co-Defendant Jessup continued to coerce the Plaintiffs to refrain

from prosecution or face seizure of their property in the “Cayo Costa” Subdivision.

8. Def. Barry knew that the Plaintiffs had specifically reported the prima facie nullity and

illegality of Jessup’s “writ of execution”-extortion-scheme. With particularity, Defendant

Barry knew and fraudulently concealed that there had never been any legitimate grounds for

any “writ of execution” and that the facially forged “writ” was for criminal and illegal

2
 purposes of, e.g., record coercion and extorting fees and property from the Plaintiff public

corruption whistleblowers.

OBSTRUCTION OF COMMUNICATIONS AS TO COMMISSION OF CRIMES

9. Defendant Ryan Barry obstructed and prevented the communications of information

relating to the commission of felonies and unlawful acts directly involving, e.g., Defendant

Crooked Judges Honeywell, S. Polster Chappell, and John E. Steele.

THREATS, INTIMIDATION, AND HARRASSMENT

10. For unlawful purposes of, e.g., coercing the Plaintiffs to refrain from reporting crimes and

prosecuting corrupt Government Officials and concealing public corruption, Defendant

Samuel intimidated, harassed, and threatened the Plaintiffs with punishment and

prosecution under color of office and authority.

11. Defendant Barry knew and fraudulently concealed that Defendant U.S. Judges had

deliberately deprived the Plaintiffs of express fundamental rights such as, e.g., due

process, equal protection of the law, prosecution by jury trial, equal court access, freedom

from Government oppression and terror, and freedom from unlawful seizures.

CONSPIRACY TO CONCEAL CORRUPTION AND BRIBERY

12. Defendant Ryan Barry conspired to conceal public corruption, and that in exchange for

bribes, Defendant Judges and Government Officials had deliberately deprived the Plaintiff

corruption victims of their express fundamental rights under the Florida and Federal

Constitutions. Def. Barry knew that on the record, U.S. Defendants had perverted, e.g., the

express fundamental rights to be free of Government corruption, oppression, fraudulent

seizure of property, to own property, exclude Government, redress Government grievances,

and defend against public corruption and Government crimes.

3
 CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT COMMUNICATIONS OF CRIME INFORMATION

13. In direct communications, the Plaintiffs had repeatedly reported Government forgeries of

fictitious “land parcels” and a non-existent “park” to Def. Barry, who recklessly obstructed

Plaintiffs’ crime information about the land-grab-extortion-scheme and fake “parcels” “12-

44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”, which neither Def. Barry nor Co-

Defendant Jessup could identify on the 1912 “Cayo Costa” Subdivision Plat of Survey in Lee

County Plat Book 3, Page 25.

PERJURY AND/OR MATERIAL MISREPRESENTATION FOR EXTORTION

14. Def. Barry knew and fraudulently concealed that for criminal and/or unlawful purposes of

extortion of property and coercion, Co-Defendant Barry had perjured himself and/or

materially misrepresented “service” and/or “process”. See Doc. # 429, Case No. 2:2007-cv-

00228. Def. Barry knew and fraudulently concealed that Co-Defendant Richard Jessup had

never served Dr. “Jorg Busse at Clerk’s office of U.S. Courthouse” on “2-8-10”.

FRAUD AND DELIBERATE DEPRIVATIONS

15. Defendants Ryan Barry and Richard Jessup knew the facially deceptive information on the

“process receipt and return” to be fraudulent, Doc. # 429, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228:

“Subject property is located as shown on maps contained in the website of the Lee

County Property Appraiser, Parcel No. 12-44-20-01-00015.015A (www.leepa.org).”

CONSPIRACY TO EXTORT & MISLEAD UNDER COLOR OF OFFICE

16. Defendant Wilkinson was a named party Defendant without any authority to pervert

Plaintiffs’ record conveyance of riparian Lot 15A, “Cayo Costa”, on the Gulf of Mexico in

reference to said PB 3 PG 25 (1912). See Warranty Deed, Lot 15A, LEE COUNTY INSTR

# 2010000171344. Def. Supervisor Barry knew and fraudulently concealed that Defendant

4
 Wilkinson was not any professional surveyor or real property attorney, and unauthorized to

determine any parcel boundaries or “site” on the soil. See also PRESCOTT v. STATE OF

FLORIDA, 343 Fed. Appx. 395, 396-97 (11th Circuit Apr. 21, 2009):

“I. BACKGROUND

A. Current Action

The Appellants are owners of Lot 15A in the Cayo Costa subdivision in Lee

County, Florida.”

CONSPIRACY TO DECEIVE AND PERPETRATE FRAUD ON THE COURT

17. Defendants R. Barry and R. Jessup ignored, concealed, and deceived, and conspired to

fraudulently misrepresent the specific “disclaimers” and notices on the referenced website,

“www.leepa.org”. Said website was only for “assessed property value” purposes. Plaintiff

Dr. Jorg Busse is a State Certified Appraiser who had proven the fraud and extortion

schemes by Def. “land parcel” Forger Kenneth M. Wilkinson.

EXTENSION OF RECORD EXTORTION AND FRAUD SCHEMES

18. Defendant Ryan Barry extended the record extortion and fraud schemes by Defendant

“land parcel” Forger Kenneth M. Wilkinson.

CONSPIRACY TO “POST” PLAINTIFFS’ UNENCUMBERED PROPERTY

19. Defendant Crooked Barry knew and fraudulently concealed that Plaintiffs’ riparian property

was unencumbered and free and clear of any “judgment”, because no unpaid “judgment”

could be found on the Docket of Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228 and no genuine valid “writ of

execution” had ever been “issued”.

5
20. Defendant Barry conspired with other Officials to “post” Plaintiffs’ facially unencumbered

property for illegal and criminal purposes such as, e.g., coercing and retaliating against the

Plaintiffs, and extorting their property. See Doc. # 429, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228 …

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13