Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Fine's Reply in Support of Motion to Vacate - USDC - Fine v Sheriff (Habeas Corpus) - 09-cv-1914

Fine's Reply in Support of Motion to Vacate - USDC - Fine v Sheriff (Habeas Corpus) - 09-cv-1914

Ratings: (0)|Views: 815|Likes:
Published by Honor in Justice

More info:

Published by: Honor in Justice on Jul 20, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

02/01/2013

pdf

text

original

RICHARD I. FINE
Prisoner ID # 1824367
c/o Men’s Central Jail
441 Bauchet Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
RICHARD I. FINE,
Petitioner,
vs.
SHERIFF OF LOS ANGELES
COUNTY,
Respondent.
Case No. CV-09-01914 JFW (CW)

PETITIONER’S REPLY IN
SUPPORT OF MOTION TO
VACATE

DATE: Vacated
TIME: Vacated
PLACE: Courtroom 640
255 East Temple Street
Los Angeles, CA 90012
--
123456789
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
I. PREFATORY STATEMENT …….…………………………………….1

II. SHERIFF BACA, THE L.A. SUPERIOR COURT AND JUDGE YAFFE
DO NOT CONTEST THAT L.A. COUNTY AND JUDGE YAFFE
COMMITTED “FRAUD UPON THE COURT” IN THE MARINA
STRAND CASE……………….…………………………………….….4

III. THE JULY 13, 2010 MINUTE ORDER DEMONSTRATES THAT L.A. COUNTY AND JUDGE YAFFE COMMITTED “FRAUD UPON THE COURT” IN THE MARINA STRAND CASE

………………8
IV. THE L.A. SUPERIOR COURT, JUDGE YAFFE AND MR.
McCORMICK DELIBERATELY MISLED THIS COURT ………...11
CONCLUSION………………………………………………………..…..6
ii
--
123456789
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
Cases
In Re Farr, 36 Cal.App.3d 577, 584 (1974)……………………………….4
Los Angeles County Ass’n of Environmental Health Specialists v.
Lewin et al., 215 F Supp. 2d 1071 (C.D. Cal. 2002)………………….13, 14
Silva v. County of Los Angeles, et al., 215 F. Supp. 2d 1079
(C.D. Cal. 2002)……………………………………………………… 13, 14
Skilling v. United States, 561 U.S. __ (2010)……………………………...16
Sturgeon v. County of Los Angeles, 167 Cal. App. 4th, 630 (2008)…9, 13, 14
Statutes

Code of Civil Procedure § 170.3……………..…1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18 Code of Civil Procedure § 170.3(c)(4)……………………………….2, 11 Code of Civil Procedure § 170.1(a)(6)(A)(iii)…………………..…….…7 California Code of Judicial Ethics, Canons 4D(1)………….………….…7 California Code of Judicial Ethics, Canon 3E(2)………….…………..…7 California Code of Judicial Ethics, Canon 3E(1)………….………….…..7 28 U.S.C. § 2243………………………………………….………….…..4 18 U.S.C. § 1346 - Intangible Right to Honest Services ….………….… 15

Other Authorities

Article VI, Section 19 of the California Constitution……………12, 13, 16 First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution……………………………….13 Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution……………………………….13 Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution……………………… 13 Senate Bill SBx2-11……………………………………………..………16

iii

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->