UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

FORT MYERS DIVISION

JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT, DR. JORG BUSSE,

Plaintiffs,

versus Case # 2:10-cv-00390-JES-AEP

CHARLENE EDWARDS HONEYWELL; SHERI POLSTER CHAPPELL;

JOHN EDWIN STEELE; JENNIFER WAUGH CORINIS; A. BRIAN ALBRITTON,

Defendants.

INDEPENDENT ACTION
FOR RELIEF FROM GOVERNMENT CRIMES, CORRUPTION,
AND FACIALLY FRAUDULENT WRIT OF EXECUTION
____________________________________________________________________________/

NOTICE OF SERVICE OF AFFIDAVIT UPON DEF. U.S. DEPUTY MARSHALS

RICHARD, a.k.a. “RICK”, JESSUP, AND RYAN BARRY

AND DEMAND “TO STAY PROCEEDINGS ON THE EXECUTION”

PURSUANT TO CH. 56, § 56.15, FLORIDA STATUTES

IN SUPPORT OF EMERGENCY MOTION FOR SUMMARY REMEDY AND

TO STAY PRIMA FACIE ILLEGAL ‘EXECUTION’ AS A MATTER OF LAW

EMERGENCY OF PUBLIC CORRUPTION, CRIMES, AND ALTERED RECORDS

1. The publicly recorded corruption, crimes, unlawful acts, and record alterations and

falsifications of official documents in this Court have been an EMERGENCY under public

policy.
 EMERGENCY MOTION FOR SUMMARY REMEDY

2. The Plaintiffs made an Affidavit that the “execution” is illegal and stated as grounds, e.g., the

lack of any supporting judgment on the Docket of Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, the lack of any

falsely alleged “Rule 38 motion” by Defendant K. M. Wilkinson on the record.

DEMAND FOR INJUNCTION AND SUSPENSION OF ANY EXECUTION

3. Therefore under Florida law, here immediately the U.S. Marshal and/or Sheriff must

suspend proceedings on the execution with corrupt intent to illegally obtain benefits.

Plaintiffs move this Court to enjoin Defendants Ryan Barry and Richard Jessup from any

proceedings on the fraudulent execution, because said Defendants knew and conspired to

conceal that no factual and/or legal basis for any execution had ever existed and that no

judge had ever authorized any authentic “writ”. Here, no judge had even been named.

DEF. CROOKED HONEYWELL’S RECORD CONCEALMENT AND COVER-UP

4. Defendant Government Whore C. E. Honeywell fraudulently concealed and conspired with

other Officials and Defendants to conceal:

a. Publicly recorded forgeries of non-existent “land parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0”

and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”;
b. Lack of any recorded “5,048.60 judgment” and “writ of execution” on the Docket of Case
No. 2:2007-cv-00228;
c. Public corruption in the Office of Crooked Judge Defendant Charlene Edwards
Honeywell;
d. That Honeywell could not locate the prima facie forged “parcels” on the 1912 “Cayo
Costa” Subdivision Plat of Survey in Lee County Plat Book 3, Page 25.

COERCION AND EXTORTION

5. For criminal and illegal purposes of coercing the Plaintiffs to “cease and desist” prosecuting

her and other Government Defendants for organized Government crimes and corruption,

Honeywell altered and/or falsified official records, and threatened “civil contempt” without

any justification.

2
 CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST DEF. HONEYWELL

6. Again on 07/19/2010, Plaintiff Government corruption victim Prescott complained to the

Federal Bureau of Investigation.

OBSTRUCTION OF COURT ACCESS AND FILING OF NOTICE OF APPEAL

7. Defendant Crooked Honeywell totally obstructed any and all court access in Case No.

2:2009-cv-00791. Plaintiffs were absolutely entitled to file their Notice of Appeal from

fraudulent “order”, Doc. # 213, but were obstructed for criminal and illegal purposes of

concealment and cover-up of public corruptoion. See Doc. # 214.

EVER INCREASING THREATS AND “ARREST” THREATS AGAINST PLAINTIFFS

8. Staff members of Defendant Crooked Judge C. E. Honeywell unintelligently threatened the

“arrest” of the Plaintiffs unless they cease and desist prosecuting and reporting the public

corruption in the U.S. District Court. Said record threats followed “arrest” threats by

Defendant U.S. Deputy Marshal Richard Jessup. In the record absence of any “judgment”

and “writ of execution”, Defendant Jessup “posted” Plaintiffs’ property for criminal and

illegal purposes of extorting property and fees without any legal basis and coercing the

Plaintiffs to refrain from redressing Government grievances

9. Defendant U.S. Deputy Marshal “Rick” Jessup and his Supervisor, Defendant Ryan Barry,

knew that bribed Def. U.S. Judges and Officials have been deliberately depriving the

Plaintiff corruption whistleblowers of express fundamental rights and Florida and Federal

Constitutional guarantees.

PUBLISHED NOTICE OF ILLEGAL EXECUTION UNDER FLORIDA LAW

10. The purported “execution” issued illegally. See § 56.15, Fla. Stat.; Case No. 2:2007-cv-

00228.

3
 NO $5,048.60 JUDGMENT WAS EVER RECORDED

11. “No execution or other final process shall issue until the judgment on which it is based has

been recorded nor within the time for serving a motion for new trial or rehearing.…

Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.550. Here, no “judgment in the amount of $5,048.60” was ever “recorded”,

Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228. Here, no evidence of any such judgment ever existed or could

have possibly existed as a matter of law.

DEFENDANT CLERKS’ FALSIFICATIONS OF OFFICIAL RECORDS

12. On 07/16/2010, Defendant U.S. District Clerks Drew Heathcoat and Diane Nipper again

falsified and altered official documents and records for criminal and unlawful purposes of

obstructing justice and Plaintiffs’ court access.

13. In particular, the Clerk obstructed, and conspired with other Defendants to obstruct,

electronic court access, court access, and the filing of Plaintiffs’ pleadings, Case No. 2:2007-

cv-00791; 2:2009-cv-00791. In particular, Defendants Nipper and Heathcoat deliberately

deprived the Plaintiffs of their express fundamental rights to redress Government grievances,

and file their Motions for new trial and rehearing, and Notices of Appeal.

DIRECT INDEPENDENT ATTACKS OF CRIMINAL & ILLEGAL “EXECUTION”

14. Here on the record, the Plaintiffs have been directly attacking the prima facie criminality,

illegality, and nullity of the fraudulently procured “execution”, which issued illegally. See §

56.15, Fla. Stat.; Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228; 2:2010-cv-00089; 2:2010-cv-00791.

PRIMA FACIE LACK OF RECORD, FED.R.CIV.P. 44

15. On 07/16/2010, Defendant Corrupt U.S. District Clerk Drew Heathcoat obstructed to issue

“a written statement that a diligent search of the designated records in Case No. 2:2007-cv-

4
 00228 revealed no “writ of execution” and no “judgment” awarding “$5,048.60” to

Defendant K. M. Wilkinson.” See Fed.R.Civ.P. 44.

PRIMA FACIE ORGANIZED PUBLIC CORRUPTION

16. The fake “writ of execution”, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228, is another publicly recorded

element of organized Government and judicial corruption with corrupt intent to extort fess

and property from the Plaintiff corruption whistleblowers.

PRIMA FACIE GROUNDS TO STAY ILLEGAL “EXECUTION” OF RECORD

17. Repeatedly, the Plaintiff public corruption victims stated several grounds as good cause to

stay the illegal execution. Grounds for the motion appeared on the face. Here, e.g., no

judgment had existed. See Docket Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228. The purported basis for the

non-existent judgment had never existed, because Def. Forger Wilkinson had never filed any

“Rule 38 motion”. See Docket for Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.

RECORD EXTORTION AND FORGERIES BY DEF. APPRAISER WILKINSON

18. Because, e.g., Def. Forger Wilkinson had criminally and illegally forged “land parcels”

“12-44-20-01-0000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”, Plaintiffs’ Appellants’ Appeal

had been highly meritorious, and no “frivolous appeal” could have possibly existed.

RECORD FABRICATION OF “FRIVOLITY” AND “JUDGMENT”

19. No “frivolity” was ever determined in the “judgment”, Doc. # 365, Case ## 2:2007-cv-00228;

2008-13170-BB. Here, no monetary penalty had ever been awarded to Defendant

Government Crook Wilkinson.

PUBLICLY RECORDED FALSIFICATION OF RECORDS

20. For criminal and unlawful purposes of obstructing justice and court access and perpetrating

fraud on the Courts, Defendants John E. Steele, Sheri Polster Chappell, Charlene E.

5
 Honeywell, Mark A. Pizzo, and Richard A. Lazzara falsified and altered, and conspired to

falsify and alter, public records.

21. Said judicial Crooks knew and fraudulently concealed that no “regulation”, “resolution”,

“resolution 569/875”, “law”, “legislative act” had ever existed, and that as a matter of

supreme Florida and Federal law, no “law” could have possibly divested the Plaintiffs’ of

their unimpeachable record title to Parcel # 12-44-20-01-00015.015A, PB 3, PG 25 (1912).

22. Doc. # 386-2, Case No. # 2:2007-cv-00228, evidenced an illegal “motion” filed on

08/20/2008 under fraudulent pretenses. Here, the deadline for any hypothetical “Rule 38

motion” had terminated on or around 08/08/2008, and Def. Wilkinson had never filed

anything prior to said deadline to justify any judgment or monetary punishment. Therefore

here, no lawful basis could have possibly existed, and the illegal “execution” has been

fraudulent on its face.

PRIMA FACIE ILLEGAL “writ of execution” - AFFIDAVIT

23. Here, no lawful writ of execution had ever been issued. Furthermore, the Plaintiffs made an

Affidavit that the “execution” is illegal and stated as grounds, e.g., the lack of any

supporting judgment, the lack of any falsely alleged “Rule 38 motion” by Defendant K. M.

Wilkinson.

PLAINTIFFS’ COMMUNICATIONS OF PUBLIC CORRUPTION AND FELONIES

24. Plaintiffs again contacted Defendant Crooked Attorney Jack N. Peterson for Def. Forger

Kenneth M. Wilkinson and reported said publicly recorded public corruption, extortion,

coercion, and fraud, Tel. 239-533-2236.

07/19/10 COMMUNICATIONS TO FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

6
25. On 07/19/2010, Plaintiff public corruption victim Jennifer Franklin Prescott updated the

Federal Bureau of Investigation about the public corruption, extortion, fraud, and fraudulent

“writ”.

PRIMA FACIE FRAUD ON THE COURT AND EXTORTION

26. Furthermore, the Plaintiff corruption victims move this Court to “set aside“ the non-existent

judgment and “writ” in accordance with, e.g., Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.540(b), 1.500, and/or 1.540(a).

27. In the prima facie record absence of any recorded judgment, any writ of execution, and any

“Rule 38 motion”, Defendants illegally and fraudulently procured an illegal “writ”.

28. Furthermore here, there were other pending actions affecting the subject matter and

conclusively evidencing the prima facie illegality of the fake “writ”, direct attacks upon its

criminality, as well as fraud, extortion, and corruption. See also Daytona Enterprises, Inc. v.

Wagner, 91 So.2d 171 (Fla. 1956); Childs v. Boats, 112 Fla. 282, 152 So. 214 (1933);

McGee v. Ancrum, 33 Fla. 499, 15 So. 231 (1894); Fair v. Tampa Electric Company, 158

Fla. 15, 27 So.2d 514 (1946); Viggio v. Wood, 101 So.2d 922 (3 D.C.A. 1958).

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand

1. An Order granting summary remedies to the Plaintiffs, because Defendants forged “land

parcels”, coerced and threatened the Plaintiffs with “arrest” and “civil contempt”, and then

extorted fees and property under fraudulent pretenses of a non-existent “writ” and un-

recorded “judgment”;

2. An Order enjoining the publicly recorded illegal “execution”-scheme under Florida law;

3. An Order granting the Plaintiffs summary remedies against the record public corruption

and non-existent “writ of execution”, and non-existent “Rule 38 motion”;

4. An Order staying the illegal and null & void “writ of execution” and any “execution”;

7
5. An Order enjoining any further public corruption and the record falsification of “land

parcels” “12-44-20-01-00000.00A0” and “07-44-21-01-00001.0000”;

6. An Order enjoining Defendant Forger K. M. Wilkinson from forging and falsifying official

records and documents for criminal and unlawful purposes of, e.g., extorting unrecorded

fees and property under facially false pretenses of a non-existent “5,048.60 judgment” and

fictitious “writ of execution”;

7. An Order directing and/or compelling the Clerk of Court to authenticate and certify the

lack of any “writ of execution” on the Docket of Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228 pursuant to

Fed.R.Civ.P. 44.

__________________________________
/S/JENNIFER FRANKLIN PRESCOTT
Governmental Corruption & Fraud Victim, Plaintiff, pro se
P.O. BOX 845, Palm Beach, FL 33480; T: 561-400-3295
____________________________________
/S/JORG BUSSE, M.D., M.M., M.B.A., C.P.M.
Judicial Corruption & Crime Victim; Plaintiff, pro se
State Cert. Res. Appraiser, Licensed Real Estate Broker, Mortgage Broker, Appraisal Instructor

8
5
2
6
3
4
7