High Quality
Open the downloaded document, and select print from the file menu (PDF reader required).
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALSFOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
⎫
M
ATTEL
, I
NC
., a Delawarecorporation,
Defendant-counter-claimant- Appellee,
v.MGA E
NTERTAINMENT
, I
NC
.; MGAE
NTERTAINMENT
(HK) L
IMITED
, aHong Kong Special AdministrativeRegion business entity; I
SAAC
L
ARIAN
, an individual,No. 09-55673
Counter-defendants-Appellants,
D.C. No.
⎬
C
ARTER
B
RYANT
, an individual,2:04-cv-09049-
Plaintiff-counter-defendant,
SGL-RNBC
ARLOS
G
USTAVO
M
ACHADO
G
OMEZ
, an individual; MGAE
DE
M
EXICO
, S.R.L.
DE
C.V., a Mexicobusiness entity,
Counter-defendants,
A
NNE
W
ANG
,
Third-party-defendant,
O
MNI
808 I
NVESTORS
LLC,
Movant.
⎭
10523
⎫
C
ARTER
B
RYANT
, an individual,
Plaintiff-counter-defendant- Appellee,
MGA E
NTERTAINMENT
, I
NC
.; MGAE
NTERTAINMENT
(HK) L
IMITED
, aHong Kong Special AdministrativeRegion business entity; I
SAAC
No. 09-55812L
ARIAN
, an individual,D.C. No.
Counter-defendants-Appellees,
2:04-cv-09049-SGL-v.
⎬
RNBM
ATTEL
, I
NC
., a Delawarecorporation,OPINION
Defendant-counter-claimant- Appellant,
C
ARLOS
G
USTAVO
M
ACHADO
G
OMEZ
, an individual; MGAE
DE
M
EXICO
, S.R.L.
DE
C.V., a Mexicobusiness entity,
Counter-defendants.
⎭
Appeal from the United States District Courtfor the Central District of CaliforniaStephen G. Larson, District Judge, PresidingArgued and SubmittedDecember 9, 2009—Pasadena, CaliforniaFiled July 22, 2010Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Stephen S. Trott andKim McLane Wardlaw, Circuit Judges.Opinion by Chief Judge Kozinski
10524M
ATTEL
v. MGA E
NTERTAINMENT
COUNSEL
E. Joshua Rosenkranz (argued) and Lisa T. Simpson, Orrick,Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, New York; AnnetteL. Hurst and Warrington S. Parker III, Orrick, Herrington &Sutcliffe LLP, San Francisco, California; and Thomas J.Nolan and Jason D. Russell, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher& Flom LLP, Los Angeles, California, for the appellants.
10528M
ATTEL
v. MGA E
NTERTAINMENT
Add a Comment