November 7 2007 November 8, 2007

To: RCMP To: Robert McCreary

Insp. Brian Verheul Crown Attorney's Office
O i/c CCS Courthouse
50 Eagle Street West
Michael.Thomson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca Newmarket, ON L3Y 6B1
Fax: (905) 853-4849 Frank Gallagher
Re: Government Corruption, Conspiracy 34 Riverglen Drive
Keswick.On
See web sites
L4P 2P8
Response required franklyone@hotmail.com
Dear Insp. Brian Verheul

For the record

As you are aware I met with Sgt Steinebech on October 18 2007 and e-mailed you using the
Michael.Thomson@rcmp-grc.gc.ca e-mail address which I had been using for near two years to provide
you the evidence of the government corruption and conspiracy against the people which your office has
chosen to ignore.

Pages 3-10 is a copy of the e-mail dated October 18 2007 which I sent to your office recapping the
meeting with Sgt Steinebech and again requesting you address the issues of Government Conspiracy

I have provided you my web sites where the issues and evidence is to be found.
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society

You and the irresponsible government personnel whose e-mail addresses are listed below on page 11
have been provided a prodigious amount of evidence to this endeavor and have been informed where it is
to be found on my web site for all to see.

I request once again that you study the evidence to be found there until you are coherent to the facts and
then commence or cause to commence proceedings as is your responsibility as clearly stated in Hon.
Stockwell Day’s e-mail to me November 2 2007 which can be found on my web site
http://groups.google.com/group/guardians-of-the-canadians-charter-of-rights-and-freedoms
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society along with other relative letters where you will also
find a copy of this e-mail to you.

The following is an excerpt from that e-mail and I suggest you read it in its entirety along with the other
correspondence listed on the said web site.

As Minister of Public Safety I am accountable to both Parliament and the public for the RCMP and must
ensure that the Force functions with full respect for Canada’s democratic traditions and the fundamental
rights and freedoms of Canadians.

I request once you are coherent to the facts you will carry out your responsibility in full respect for the
Rights and Freedoms of Canadians fundamental to the support of the guarantee to each individual
provided by the Federal government in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Obviously the Constitution is just a worthless piece of paper without enforcement and without
enforcement consistent to and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights the government
1
personnel financed and responsible to enforce it are just as worthless and it is incomprehensible that any
of you should be continued to be financed by the people for such absurdity.

Your immediate response with due regard for time to review the evidence is required and you are
expected to act diligently consistent with and conducive to the individual’s guaranteed Charter Rights as
their safety and protection of their guaranteed equality of benefits is dependent on your conviction and
fortitude to the task.

I remind you are on Candid camera so to speak and your immediate attention to the issues is required as it
is your responsibility.

May I suggest once again that you meet with the other police forces, YRP and the OPP so as to efficiently
and effectively deal with the issues as it is all your responsibilities and perhaps alleviate any gaps of
authority and reduce any redundancy as you address the issues competent to the endeavor.

I hope I have made my self clear and you will understand the importance to you and your department to
address the issues as per your responsibility to do so.

Thank you,

Frank Gallagher
Frank Gallagher

2
October 18 2007

To: RCMP
Insp. Brian Verheul
O i/c CCS

Sgt. Steve Semenchuk

NCO i/c Intake CCS

Cpl Mona Eichman

Re: Government corruption and conspiracy

Meeting with Sgt. Steinebech today.

Dear Insp. Brian Verheul

Today my mother Edythe Gallagher and I dropped into the RCMP headquarters Harry Walker Blvd,
Newmarket and spent a couple of hours between 11 AM and 1 PM talking to RCMP staff to determine
who has the responsibility to deal with matters of government corruption and conspiracy and eventually I
was introduced to Sgt. Steinebech

As I wrote the times down I realize that I must have connected at an inopportune time straddling staffs
lunch times and if you could apologize to them for my inconsideration I would appreciate it.
Not once did anyone mention it as they listened to hear me out and I should also apologize for being
impatient with them when they point out their mandate limits their authority to deal with such matters.

That is the inherent problem with the system as there is nobody mandated to do so as I have
comprehensively and irrefutably proven in an e-mail I sent simultaneously to a prodigious number of
Ontario and Federal government personnel listed in the document, Preamble Federal correspondence
Recap October 9 2007 which I had attached.
It was a letter addressed to Randy Craig, Detective. Sergeant OPP Anti-Rackets for his attention to the
issues contained within but everyone who I e-mailed to were also requested to attend to the issues.

The document was a response to, Federal Ombudsman of Victims of Crime Louis Theoret’s e-mail of
October 5 2007 and in fact the document included the correspondence between him and I since
September 20 2007 which I had copied to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada Robert
Nicholson so as to keep him up to speed as to the issues of the Ontario Government corruption and
conspiracy so as to to provide him the opportunity to deal with the issues and hand him the rope to hang
himself with.

I had several times previous provided him the evidence but his office declined to respond.

In Louis Theoret’s e-mail of September 27 2007 he acknowledged that the issues were of a serious
nature however he stated the issues were not within his jurisdiction which is utter nonsense since his duty
is victimsfirst@ombudsman.gc.ca unless of course that means there ultimate purpose is to create victims which the whole
government establishment are bent on.

The fact is victims is his business to help and where clear and present danger is evident due diligence
must be applied to that which is predictable in an initiative of prevention.

3
His response wasn’t unexpected as you will note in my first e-mail to him dated September 20 2007 but I
had to go through the formalities to get it documented.

At the same time to keep everyone on my e-mail list on the same page including the Minister of Justice
and Attorney General Robert Nicholson whom I presume is the authority to deal with the corruption and
conspiracy of the Ontario Government since they had all declined to take action on the issues of a serious
nature which was ultimately their failure to provide a legal system capable of demonstrating due diligence
to the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

To prove this one last time and to also prove the said Minister of Justice was in on the conspiracy I
provided them all simultaneously the irrefutable evidence along with my web site
http://groups.google.com/group/peoples-law-society where the evidence and more is to be found should they have
misplaced theirs.

I had presumed the Minister Robert Nicholson was the person who should be responsible to back the
individual’s guaranteed Charter rights, however I asked them all to tell me who was responsible if not he
and nobody at all has responded other than a couple of phone calls from Ms Petrie of the office of Robert
McCreary Crown Attorney, Newmarket requesting me to fax some additional pages of the 41 page
document which didn’t come through

With not one person responding to the issues which are of a serious nature proves irrefutably the
incompetence of the legal system and the irresponsible personnel which run rampant throughout who are
unequivocally indifferent to the individuals Charter rights.

I reiterate this was known to me long ago being so obvious as the evidence shows but I was attentive to
documenting it well, not for the purpose of presenting it before the courts which would be an exercise of
futility since the whole system, Federal and Provincial is corrupt and in on the conspiracy together.

I have stated in my writings that I understand life and know full well how it works where the people are
brain washed from the day they are born where they fit into the system believing the law is a group of
respectable people of irreproachable integrity but often the law is an ass due to the fact it is staffed by
humans who are proned to err and that’s just how it is thought to be according to common sense with a lot
of corruption on the side.

All the different cultures and religions attest to the influence of the environment they are reared and the
inherent nature of hanging on to their cultures as they leave the country of their ancestry to begin a new
and prosperous way of life here in Canada.

Traditions which they are determined to hang on to like an anchor as they attempt to struggle ahead.

It is a mind thing deeply embedded in their brains over time passed on and on..
Like the legal system which is operated by members of the Law Society of Upper Canada and like
societies who like to hold on to tradition as stated in the Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney
General which is published on his web site.

There you will find a prodigious amount of evidence that the Office of the Ontario Attorney General has
determined to carry on tradition as they continue to administer and enforce the laws of Ontario consistent
with the rule of law as it was before the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982.

4
That was the well established legal principle, that most elusive concept, hard to easily define. It was
the rule of law, which the Attorney General of Ontario, was the Guardian of, which protected the
people and society as a whole.

I would have to say it could not protect the people very well considering the description of it and
obviously the ordinary moral majority would not commonly know the rule of law which protected them
was so incompetent to do so.

It clearly states that it was a well established legal principle and obviously those people of the legal
profession would be well aware of the incompetence of it as they would know now, and obviously the
people wouldn’t know any better today than they would have then.

This is obviously a testament to the legal professions deprivation of morality and integrity and the
Attorney General’s indifference to the well being of the individual and society as a whole attests to it.

In any crime law enforcers are attentive to opportunity and motive and I suspect a look at his house,
automobiles in his driveway, second and third properties, private schools his kids go to, yachts and travel
expenses whatever, would address that issue.

They are all partners in crime feasting off the people as they turn the simplest issues of right and wrong
into major Federal cases which costs are prohibitive to the moral majority.

I know I am just going through the formalities because you all know and in fact could offer a whole lot
more but this isn’t for you, it’s for the people to know exactly what is going on and by your failure to act
for them consistent and conducive to their guaranteed Charter rights they won’t need to see anymore than
what is written and documented herein and what you have not done to attend to the issues regarding their
well being and their right to provide a prosperous life for themselves.

They already know as you do the government is corrupt and the evidence within these writings explains
precisely how it is done and who is involved.
Everyone in the said e-mail list and of course whoever is yet to be linked when the people rise to force a
Public Inquiry.

We already know the office of the DOJ is linked to corruption and conspiracy through the Standing
Committee on Public Accounts hearing of the RCMP pension fund scandal and we know who obstructed
justice when the Standing Committee was told to Sit on it..

They won’t be befuddled by the deceitful ways of lawyers who will not be sitting to judge nor will
anything they have to say be heard by the majority and those who bother will just have more evidence
against them which already runneth over.
It is pathetic that I feel it necessary to Dick and Jane you people in hopes you will Spot your way to act
responsibly in accordance with the supreme law of Canada, the Constitution which is the very foundation
of what Canada and its people stand for.

You people do know there is no Santa Clause even though Virginia was lied to, even though it is done in
the good spirit of things.

You do know that the conspirators are not doing it in the spirit of anything other than to satiate their own
spirits.

5
How can you people call yourselves law enforcers when you are indifferent to it following rules,
regulations, policies which are neither coherent to, competent to or consistent with the law, the supreme
law, the Constitution which makes them of no force or effect?

The Law Society of Upper Canada’s admission, in the aforesaid correspondence that their members do
not have to give a shit about the individual’s Charter rights, as they continue in their unscrupulous
traditional ways as defined in the Role of the Attorney General published on his web site where he is the
Guardian of the rule of law which was a well established legal principle being that most elusive concept,
hard to easily define which protected the people and society as a whole back in 1982 but was superseded
by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms at the moment of the enactment where the rule of law
was incompetent to back the individual’s guarantees as provided by the Charter, inconsistent with the
aspirations attributed to God who is recognized to be supreme by the supreme law of Canada, the
Constitution.

There have been no amendments to the Roles and Responsibilities of the Attorney General since the
Charter inclusion to the Constitution Act, 1982 such as

The Attorney General

(d) shall perform the duties and have the powers that belong to the Attorney General and Solicitor General
of England by law and usage, so far as those powers and duties are applicable to Ontario, and also shall
perform the duties and powers that, until the Constitution Act, 1867 came into effect, belonged to the
offices of the Attorney General and Solicitor General in the provinces of Canada and Upper Canada and
which, under the provisions of that Act, are within the scope of the powers of the Legislature;

The document, Preamble Federal correspondence Recap October 9 2007, the 41 page document
addressed to Randy Craig OPP which was provided to everyone on the said
e-mail list proves 1 of 2 things that either nobody knows who is responsible to back the individual’s
guaranteed Charter rights or they know nobody is responsible to back the individual’s Charter rights and
they ain’t telling.

I know who is ultimately responsible to the people of Ontario through the legislature, and who is
responsible for constitutional matters and who is responsible to ensure the laws of Ontario are legal and
who is the guardian of the public interest and I know the Attorney General has unique responsibilities to
the Crown, the courts, the Legislature and the executive branch of government.
I know who has a constitutional and traditional responsibility beyond that of a political minister.
I know who
(b) shall see that the administration of public affairs is in accordance with the law;
(c) shall superintend all matters connected with the administration of justice in Ontario
e) shall advise the Government upon all matters of law connected with legislative enactments and upon
all matters of law referred to him or her by the Government;
(f) shall advise the Government upon all matters of a legislative nature and superintend all Government
measures of a legislative nature;
(g) shall advise the heads of ministries and agencies of Government upon all
matters of law connected with such ministries and agency;
(h) shall conduct and regulate all litigation for and against the Crown or any ministry or agency of
government in respect of any subject within the authority or jurisdiction of the Legislature;
(i) shall superintend all matters connected with judicial offices;

6
(j) shall perform such other functions as are assigned to him or her by the Legislature or by the Lieutenant
Governor in Council.
I know the importance of the independence of the role is fundamental to the position and well
established in common law, statutes and tradition.
I know The Attorney General has a special role to play in advising Cabinet to ensure the rule of law is
maintained and that Cabinet actions are legally and constitutionally valid.
I know as chief law officer, the Attorney General has a special responsibility to be the guardian of that
most elusive concept - the rule of law. The rule of law is a well established legal principle, but hard to
easily define. It is the rule of law that protects individuals, and society as a whole, from arbitrary
measures and safeguards personal liberties.

I know a whole lot more too thanks to the web site of the Attorney General
I know who has guarded traditional disrespect for the people

I know
31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority.

I know
32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters
within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest
Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the
authority of the legislature of each province.
I don’t know who is above these people and the people in the list which I have provided the evidence
ain’t telling; however they are all Honourable people who each play a vital role in the premeditated
neglect of the individual’s guaranteed Charter rights.

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is
inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency,
of no force or effect.

I know for most definite fact the aspirations attributed to God who is supreme takes priority
over the unscrupulous ways of the lawyers who continue in their pathetic traditional ways.

Who amongst you will remain following the lawyers who are possessed by the Devil who have no place
in a society where the supreme law of Canada, the Constitution recognizes the supremacy of God.

The evidence consistently shows the members of the law society are of evil spirits who consistently act in
defiance of the Constitution which they are sworn to uphold.

It is not my opinion it is precisely what the evidence consistently demonstrates.

Any person who cares to pull a rabbit out of the hat as precedence or what was traditional will only
support my claim they are unscrupulous in their ways unrelentingly trying to persuade us they have more
power than God who we know full well of the aspirations attributed to him..

I know many fools and I know there are many more yet to be flushed and I suggest once again you begin
with Lawyer Files # 1, # 2 and # 3 with due regard to the ousting of number 7 the Attorney General of
Ontario Michael Bryant who among all his Roles and Responsibilities:

7
(g) shall advise the heads
of ministries and agencies of Government upon all
matters of law connected with such ministries and agency;
So there you have it. It is beyond all comprehension the ORHT would take it upon themselves to tamper
with the evidence, not record the 2nd day of the hearing and not commence or cause to commence
proceedings against Don Wilson my former tenant and president of a company I invested in, with filing a
false and misleading information with the ORHT, namely his dispute which he signed and faxed to the
ORHT, an offense under s.206 (2) of the Tenant Protection Act, 1997 value $43,000 plus
It is incomprehensible the ORHT, which is an independent agency of the Government would permit a
person to commit criminal fraud over $100,000 right in front of the judicator in a building financed by the
people as part of the legal system in Ontario mandated to administer justice in compliance with the Tenant
Protection Act, 1997 consistent with the supreme law of Canada, the Constitution Act, 1982 on their own
without advice from the Attorney General and without him being aware of it.

After all I have informed him as you are all aware that the Attorney General is cognizant of the facts as
per Lawyer File # 7 and a prodigious number of other documents which includes Judy Phillips of his
Office who was asked to respond to the evidence I provided and copies can be found on pages 19 and 32
of Government Correspondence compiled Sept, 1 2007.
I remind you that all persons addressed on the 15 Lawyer Files have received copies of all 15 Lawyer
Files.

How obvious is it that Dave Grech Investigations and Enforcement of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs
and Housing is under the Minister of said Ministry Hon. John Gerretsen and how obvious is it that the
Attorney General shall advise the heads of all Ministries on all matters of law.
How obvious is it that Dave wouldn’t go out on his own to write such a ridiculous incoherent response
September 5 2006 to the evidence and why did he take a month to finally give in to write me a reason.

If he had just erred as Randy Craig, OPP Anti-Rackets offered why when I took the trouble to drive all the
way down town from Keswick why wouldn’t he have just apologized and got on with it.

Rick Hennessey and Nancy Fahlgren of the ORHT, Dave Grech and Hon. John Gerretsen of the Ministry
of Municipal Affairs and Housing are guilty of Obstruction of Justice in matters of the Criminal code and
s.206 (1) of the Tenant Protection Act,1997 and I God damn well demand you commence proceedings
against them in compliance with the law and the individual’s Charter guarantee of protection and right to
justice.

I needn’t mention the vital importance of due punishment in due diligence to deterrence without which we
would have a lawless country which Sgt. Steinebeck offered.

I had that in mind myself.

Refusal to do so will irrefutably implicate you to the conspiracy.

I remind you that Sgt. Steinebeck refused to take the copies of the documents which I had brought to his
office because it clearly stated on the RCMP web site that documents for criminal charges will not be
accepted by e-mail and he informed me he already knew of me and my documents I have been e-mailing
Sgt.Michael Thomson and he assured me they have all been kept on file and I can continue to
communicate by e-mail as I have been doing.

8
That was witnessed by my mother as I placed great emphasis on this even asking if he was refusing to
take my evidence.

He assured me it is not necessary and I reiterate because you have all my documents on file including the
recording of the Tribunal Hearing which he stated you would have a copy of that from the first day I
dropped off the evidence near 2 years ago.

I accept him at his word; he has acknowledged you have the evidence.

The Federal Ombudsman of Victims of Crime Louis Theoret has stated he has reviewed the evidence
carefully and understands the issues are of a serious nature as do I and any person of moral conscience.

The severity of the issues and the crimes dwarf his understanding, but of course we know full well of his
integrity for allowing such conditions to remain unattended to in his negligence of the most high as
predictable is preventable and victims will continue to drop like flies.

We all know his office is dependent on victims which plays havoc on his moral inclinations and failure to
act with due diligence to this endeavor will not be tolerated.

But that will be dealt with in due course as will all issues addressed within my writings which will be
found on my web site Law Society of Upper Canada and 9 subsidiary sites.

I remind you people this is the computer age and it is to my understanding 73% of the populace have one.

People have never been as dumb as you believe they are and it is plain ignorant of you to insult our
intelligence.

You gang up on the individual who you know full well is precisely that against all you bullies and only
when groups get together like gays demanding their equal rights are you forced to listen.
When all I hear from you is reasons why you can’t help without looking for the obvious reasons you can
and are responsible to do it takes no brain surgeon to determine where you are coming from because you
can not be as bloody ignorant as you demonstrate.

Before today I had no confirmation as to whether or not you had been receiving the evidence but that has
now been confirmed which again begs the question as to why you have not commenced proceedings in
any shape or form upon the issues addressed to you which are of the utmost importance to the people of
the moral majority.

You know those people, the ones you stand by and watch the government powers that be ravish us of our
hard earned wages both in taxation and when the money is spent where consumer goods are all inflated
and then gst and pst paid on those taxes and on and on and on.
Do your law and ordering according to the law for the protection of the people of society not the criminal
element and you will find things rather orderly.
You are obvious as a hockey player scoring on his own net. Friendly fire you might say!!

Frank Gallagher

9
I am still waiting for the true meaning of the word “Threshold” in police terminology.

The line between which evidence is determined to be presented before the courts and I would ask
you to review the evidence I have provided and tell me what more could possibly be provided

And then I ask why none of

you asked for more
evidence to satisfy the
limitations.

I have a prodigious amount

of evidence to prove what
ever could be possibly be
needed to prove beyond any
reasonable doubt to any one
competent in that persuasion

10
Day.S@parl.gc.ca; MCU@JUSTICE.GC.CA
victimsfirst@ombudsman.gc.ca;Michael.Thomson@rcmp-rc.gc.ca;prevention@ps.gc.ca;randy.craig@jus.gov.on.ca;
communications@ps.gc.ca;McGuinty.D@parl.gc.ca;ahorwath-qp@ndp.on.ca;bakerg@sen.parl.gc.ca; brooksn@scc-
csc.gc.ca;bill.murdoch@pc.ola.org;
bob.runciman@pc.ola.org;bironmi@sen.parl.gc.ca;baconl@sen.parl.gc.ca;comail@lsuc.ca;citytvhosts@citytv.com;citydesk@tor.sunpub.co
m;city@thestar.ca; christine.elliott@pc.ola.org;cowanj@sen.parl.gc.ca;cordyj@sen.parl.gc.ca;dhowlett@makepovertyhistory.ca;dinovoc-
qp@ndp.on.ca;dyckli@sen.parl.gc.ca;dininc@sen.parl.gc.ca;debanp@sen.parl.gc.ca;dayja@sen.parl.gc.ca;
dawsod@sen.parl.gc.ca;editor@rd.ca;editor@tor.sunpub.com;elizabeth.witmer@pc.ola.org;egglea@sen.parl.gc.ca;ernie.hardeman@pc.ola.or
g;fureyg@sen.parl.gc.ca;frasej@sen.parl.gc.ca;fortim@sen.parl.gc.ca;
fitzpr@sen.parl.gc.ca;fairbj@sen.parl.gc.ca;gustal@sen.parl.gc.ca;grafsj@sen.parl.gc.ca;goldsy@sen.parl.gc.ca;gilla@sen.parl.gc.ca;gautht
@sen.parl.gc.ca;gcarlino@ombudsman.on.ca;hublee@sen.parl.gc.ca;
hervic@sen.parl.gc.ca;haysd@sen.parl.gc.ca;harbm@sen.parl.gc.ca;joyals@sen.parl.gc.ca;johnsj@sen.parl.gc.ca;jaffem@sen.parl.gc.ca;jcriv
est@sen.parl.gc.ca;julia.munroco@pc.ola.org;kfl@sen.parl.gc.ca; kinsen@sen.parl.gc.ca;kennyco@sen.parl.gc.ca;

lachah@sen.parl.gc.ca;losier@sen.parl.gc.ca;lebrem@sen.parl.gc.ca;lavigr@sen.parl.gc.ca;communications@ps.gc.ca;mcgeed@sen.parl.gc.c
a;munsoj@sen.parl.gc.ca;moorew@sen.parl.gc.ca;mitchg@sen.parl.gc.ca;
milnel@sen.parl.gc.ca;merchp@sen.parl.gc.ca;mercet@sen.parl.gc.ca;meighen@sen.parl.gc.ca;
mccoye@sen.parl.gc.ca;massip@sen.parl.gc.ca;mahovf@sen.parl.gc.ca;nejmcust@mms.org;nimhinfo@nih.gov;
mbryant.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mininfo@mah.gov.on.ca;nolinp@sen.parl.gc.ca;
onbox@ps.gc.ca;olived@sen.parl.gc.ca;pm@pm.gc.ca;pdowne@sen.parl.gc.ca;prudhm@sen.parl.gc.ca;poyv@sen.parl.gc.ca;
poulim@sen.parl.gc.ca;phaleg@sen.parl.gc.ca;pepinl@sen.parl.gc.ca;pkormos-
qp@ndp.on.ca;stratt@sen.parl.gc.ca;stollp@sen.parl.gc.ca;stgerg@sen.parl.gc.ca;spivam@sen.parl.gc.ca;smithd@sen.parl.gc.ca;
sibnic@sen.parl.gc.ca;smithc@sen.parl.gc.ca;szwebmaster@yahoo.com;tkachd@sen.parl.gc.ca;tardic@sen.parl.gc.ca;vanlop0@parl.gc.ca;va
nlop1@parl.gc.ca;web@ps.gc.ca;webadmin@justice.gc.ca;wattc@sen.parl.gc.ca; whistleblower@ctv.ca; zimmer@sen.parl.gc.ca;
info@cjc-ccm.gc.ca

rbartolucci.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; cbentley.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mbountrogianni.mpp@liberal.ola.org; jbradley.mpp@liberal.ola.org;

lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcansfield.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dcaplan.mpp@liberal.ola.org; machambers.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
cdicocco.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; ldombrowsky.mpp@liberal.ola.org; dduncan.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; mkwinter.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
mmeilleur.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; speters.mpp@liberal.ola.org; gphillips.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; spupatello.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
lbroten.mpp@liberal.ola.org; pfonseca.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; htakhar.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
dramsay.mpp.kirklandlake@liberal.ola.org;gsmitherman.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org; gsorbara.mpp.co@liberal.ola.org;
vdhillon.mpp@liberal.ola.org; bduguid.mpp@liberal.ola.org; kflynn.mpp@liberal.ola.org; ljeffrey.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
kkular.mpp@liberal.ola.org; mcolle.mpp@liberal.ola.org; jbrownell.mpp@liberal.ola.org;bbalkissoon.mpp@liberal.ola.org;
warthurs.mpp@liberal.ola.org;Nicholson.R@parl.gc.ca; Emerson.D@parl.gc.ca; Blackburn.J@parl.gc.ca; Thompson.G@parl.gc.ca;
Solberg.M@parl.gc.ca; Strahl.C@parl.gc.ca; Lunn.G@parl.gc.ca;

MacKay.P@parl.gc.ca; Hearn.L@parl.gc.ca; Day.S@parl.gc.ca; Skelton.C@parl.gc.ca;Toews.V@parl.gc.ca;Ambrose.R@parl.gc.ca;

Finley.D@parl.gc.ca; pm@pm.gc.ca; OConnor.G@parl.gc.ca; Oda.B@parl.gc.ca; Prentice.J@parl.gc.ca; Baird.J@parl.gc.ca;
Bernier.M@parl.gc.ca; Cannon.L@parl.gc.ca; Clement.T@parl.gc.ca; Flaherty.J@parl.gc.ca; Verner.J@parl.gc.ca; Hill.J@parl.gc.ca;
Kenney.J@parl.gc.ca; Ritz.G@parl.gc.ca; Guergis.H@parl.gc.ca; Paradis.C@parl.gc.ca;dwatch@web.net;info@ocsj.ca;
ocap@tao.ca;info@olderwomensnetwork.org; terryoc2001@yahoo.ca; adavidov@torontohabitat.on.ca;
justice@socialjustice.org;info@chfc.ca
sandra.conlin@rcmp-grc.gc.ca; robin.roberts@cpc-cpp.gc.ca; gsmith@chrt-tcdp.gc.ca; AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; potterl@scc-
csc.gc.ca;phil.jensen@servicecanada.gc.ca;AdamsoV@erc-cee.gc.ca; josee.dubois@psst-tdfp.gc.ca; elisabeth.nadeau@ps.gc.ca;
mmacpherson@pco-bcp.gc.ca; dgrandmaitre@gg.ca; tpulcine@privcom.gc.ca; aleadbea@infocom.gc.ca; clgascon@fja.gc.ca;
plourded@nafta-sec-alena.org; francois-giroux@cas-satj.gc.ca;bob.ward@chrc-ccdp.cadp.ca

11