Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
6Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Crimes by U.S. Judges in Florida

Crimes by U.S. Judges in Florida

Ratings: (0)|Views: 596|Likes:
Published by JUDICIAL_CORRUPTION
WORLD PRESS: CRIMINAL JUDGES IN THE U.S.A.
WORLD PRESS: CRIMINAL JUDGES IN THE U.S.A.

More info:

Published by: JUDICIAL_CORRUPTION on Jul 30, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/16/2011

pdf

text

original

 
KENNETH M. WILKINSON RECORD RACKETEERING & EXTORTION$24.30 MONEY JUDGMENT ISSUED AS MANDATES JUNE 11, 2009
1. The publicly recorded
$24.30
 
money judgment
“issued as mandate
June 11, 2009
”. SeeDoc. ##
365
(p. 1),
386-3
(p. 1).
 
$24.30 MONEY JUDGMENT UNDER FRAP 39,
COSTS 
 2. The
$24.30
 
money judgment
was awarded pursuant to Rule
39
, Fed.R.App.P.
COPY OF $24.30 MONEY JUDGMENT, DOC. # 386-3
3. A copy of the
final
 
$24.30 money judgment issued as mandate
was included in DefendantAppellee’s
facially fraudulent
“motion for issuance of a writ of execution”, Doc. #
386
. See pages 10 and 24.4. Of the
$29.70
requested in Racketeer Wilkinson’s Bill of Costs, Doc. #
386
, the 11
th
Circuitallowed
$24.30
for 
Costs
under FRAP
39
:
$24.30 WERE THE ALLOWED ACTUAL AND NECESSARY COSTS
5. Here,
$24.30
were the
allowed actual and necessary costs
.
$24.30 MONEY JUDGMENT BECAME FINAL ON JUNE 15, 2009
6. Pursuant to Doc. ##
365
(p. 1), 386-3 (p. 1), the U.S. District Court received and filed the
$24.30
 
money judgment
on
June 15, 2009
:
 
RACKETEERING: EXTORTION OF MONEY:
FRIVOLOUS APPEAL
” MOTION WAS ADMITTEDLY NEVER 
FILED
 
7. Defendant
Racketeer
Wilkinson
extorted
money, Doc. #
386
, by
fraudulently pretending
 a
 Rule 38 motion
, which Wilkinson knew he had never 
 filed 
:“The Judgment4. On August 22, 2008, Wilkinson filed a Motion for Sanctions pursuant to EleventhCircuit Rule
27-4
…”Said Rule
27-4
motion could not have
 possibly
been for a “
 frivolous appeal 
”.
 
 2
THE 11
th
CIRCUIT HAD CLOSED CASE ON 06/11/2009
8. The 11
th
Circuit had
CLOSED THE CASE
on
06/11/2009
:
BRIBERY
9. Here, Defendant Appellee K. M. Wilkinson and his Attorney had no right to
bribe
the 11
th
 Circuit and
illegally cause
the 11
th
Circuit to
fraudulently alter
the
recorded final $24.30mandate
after the
CASE HAD BEEN CLOSED
and the 11
th
Circuit had
LOSTJURISDICTION
.
DEFENDANT’S APPELLEE’S RACKETEETING AND EXTORTION WERE ILLEGAL
10.
Def. Wilkinson’s record racketeering
and
extortion
were illegal and unauthorized by law.
RACKETEERING & EXTORTION IN VIOLATION OF:FED.R.CIV.P. 54; LOCAL RULE 4.18; 28 U.S.C. 1921-1924; FRAP 39
11. The
$24.30 money judgment
pursuant to Rule
39
, Fed.R.App.P., became
final on June 15,2009
.
 
“LOCAL RULE 4.18 APPLICATIONS FOR COSTS OR ATTORNEY'S FEES
(a) In accordance with
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54
, all claims for costs or attorney's fees preserved by appropriate pleading or pretrial stipulation shall be asserted by separatemotion or petition filed
not later than fourteen (14) days following the entry of  judgment
. The pendency of an appeal from the judgment shall not postpone the filingof a timely application pursuant to this rule.”
DEF. WILKINSON VIOLATED REQUIREMENTS UNDER 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920-1924
The
$24.30 money judgment
was
unauthorized by law
.
 Itemization
was for 
$24.30
.
 No
documentation
for 
$24.30
.
The record
unauthorized
 
 Bill of Co
sts was for 
$24.30
.
 
 Bill of Costs
must be
verified 
as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1924.
 
 No known
affidavit 
.
Plaintiff(s)
objected
to the
unauthorized
 
$24.30 money judgment
.
The
unauthorized
 
$24.30 money judgment
was procured through, e.g., publiclyrecorded
racketeering
and
extortion
by illegal and criminal means of 
fraud
and
extortion scheme
O.R. 569/875
”, and
facially forged
land parcels
00A0
” and
00001
”. See
RICO Complaint
in U.S. District Court.
RACKETEERING & EXTORTION IN VIOLATION OF:FRAP 39 [FED.R.APP.P. 39]
12. A copy of 
Rule 39
, Fed.R.App.P., is attached.“(d)
Bill of Costs
: Objections; Insertion in Mandate.(1) A party who wants
costs
taxed must — 
within 14 days after entry of  judgment
— file with the circuit clerk, with proof of service, an
itemized
and
verified bill of costs
.”13. Here, the “judgment”,
No. 2008-13170-BB
had been “
entered: March 5, 2009
”, Doc. ##
365
, 386. Defendant Appellee Wilkinson had filed with the circuit clerk a
 
$24.30 Bill of Costs
. “Date signed” was “
3-17-2009
”, which was “
issued on: Jun 11 2009
”, Doc. ##
365
,386, Case No. 2:2007-cv-00228.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->