Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Diagramming Sentences - A Picture of Language

Diagramming Sentences - A Picture of Language



|Views: 2,130|Likes:
Published by abhii

More info:

Published by: abhii on Jun 21, 2008
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





k a hghwa ac h backbad, hg h chak  ha a h d  , h v ppg  bhd h a h dback  h ca.
We begin
, h ad,
with a straight line
. Adh,  h fm ad a cp, h p wd  h , a ad a vb—pbab mhg k
dog barked 
. Bwh wd h dw a h vca ah, bcg h . Th dw a ad—a h c a—ha kd  a aag d h wd
, ad   h w
.Ta wa : bjc, pdca, ad h  mdg acha cvzd h c—a   mad  a pc ha wav b a ca ad mav a a aca pa  a bag mdw. T hg pa wa ha h wa a pc   h ama b  h wd ha d  h ama ad . I wa a pa  mhg ha wa bh c-c (w cd ha h wd  w ad hm ad, ad h 
By Kitty Burns Florey
agammg c    h  k kdag ck ha   m  m. Wh  wa dcd  a 1877 x cad
Higher Lessonsin English
b Az Rd ad Bad Kgg, wp hgh Amca pbc ch k h ma,mbacd b ach a h wa  m d wh wgagd  ( ak H Hgg gh   cx) “hcd-bdd md  h Egh g.” B pmg hba gca   ax, dagammg wd  v k “hm ad m w” ad “I a’ g ,”  v- w k Raph Wad Em,  a a Jam FmCp.*Ev  m w h, ma a a 1877, dagammg wa  b. I ad   h xh gad m SBad.S Bad: I ca   h, a   wh a happk , cfd dawg a dad-agh hza 
 A Picture of Language
Kitty Burns Florey, a copy editor, is author of nine novels and many short stories and essays. Tis article is excerpted with permission from
S Bad’ Bakg Dg
by Kitty Burns Florey. Copyright ©2006. Published by Melville House.
for lnks toagrammng resoures.
i’ thnkng here o mrk Twn’s ous nd stll hghly entertnng essy,“Fenore cooper’s Lterry Oenses,” n whh Twn onludes tht “n therestrted spe o two-thrds o  pge, cooper hs sored 114 lterry oenses outo  possble 115. it breks the reord.” But Wlke collns lled cooper “thegretest rtst n the don o ront fton n aer.”
   i   L   L   U   S   T   R   A   T   E   d    b   Y   S   E   R   G   E   b   L   O   c   h
conveyed an actual event) and abstract (the spoken words wereinvisible, and their sounds vanished rom the air as soon as they  were uttered). Te diagram was the bridge between a dog andthe description o a dog. It was a bit like art, a bit like mathemat-ics. It was much more than words uttered, or words written on apiece o paper: it was a picture o language.I was hooked. So, it seems, were many o my contemporaries. Among the myths that have attached themselves to memorieso being educated in the ’50s is the notion that activities like dia-gramming sentences (along with memorizing poems and addinglong columns o fgures without a calculator) were draggy andmonotonous. I thought diagramming was un, and most o my riends who were subjected to it look back with varying degreeso delight. Some o us were better at it than others, but it wasconsidered a kind o treat, a game that broke up the school day. You took a sentence, threw it against the wall, picked up thepieces, and put them together again, slotting each word into itspigeonhole. When you got it right, you made order and sense outo what we used all the time and took or granted: sentences.hose ephemeral words didn’t just ade away in the air butbecame chiseled in stone—yes, this is a sentence, this is what it’smade o, this is what it looks like, a chunk o English you can seeand grab onto. As we became more profcient, the tasks got harder. Tere wasgreat appeal in the Shaker-like simplicity o sentences like
Tedog chased the rabbit 
(subject, predicate, direct object) with theirplain, no-nonsense diagrams:But there were also lovable subtleties, like the way the linethat set o a predicate adjective slanted back toward thesubject it reerred to, like a signpost or a pointing fnger:Or the thorny rosebush created by diagramming a preposi-tional phrase modiying another prepositional phrase:Or the elegant absence o the preposition with an indirectobject, indicated by a short road with no house on it:Te missing preposition—in this case
—could also be indi-cated by placing it on that road with parentheses around it, butthis always seemed to me a clumsy solution, right up there withexplaining a pun.Questions were a special case: or diagramming, they had tobe turned inside out, the way a sock has to be eased onto a oot:
What is the dog doing? 
transormed into the more dramatic:
Tedog is doing what? 
Mostly we diagrammed sentences out o a grammar book, butsometimes we were assigned the task o making up our own,taking pleasure in coming up with wild Proustian wanderingsthat—kicking and screaming—had to be corralled, harnessed,and made to trot in neat rows into the barn. We hung those sentences out like a wash, wrote them likelines o music, arranged them on a connecting web o veins andarteries until we understood every piece o them. We could seeor ourselves the dierence between
. We knew  what an adverb was, and we knew where in a sentence it went,and why it went there. And we knew that gerunds looked like nouns but were really  verbs because they could take a direct object:
Part o the un o diagramming sentences was that it didn’tmatter what they said. he dog could bark, chew gum, play chess—in the world o diagramming, sentences weren’t aboutmeaning so much as they were about subject, predicate, object,and their various dependents or modifers. All you had to do was

Activity (6)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
misko14 liked this
elmerglick liked this
liznance liked this
Arogers16 liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->