Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com/
Account Science 101 – Lesson: (DUAL) LEGAL PERSONALITY
Introducing,
John Doe Authorization Representative for JOHN DOE
Here Today to clarify the linear parts of transactional and
legal personality.
Lesson summary:
In commerce every contract, debt, obligation or
assignment requires two legal persons to validate the
event.
An event in commerce may be validated by a singular
legal person acting on behalf of the required two legal
persons, even as the same name placed in every
capacity within the event.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
To be a legal person is to be the subject of rights and duties. To confer legal rights or to impose legal duties, therefore,
is to confer legal personality3. If society by effective sanctions through its agents will coerce A to act or forbear in
favor of B, B has a right and A owes a duty4. Predictability of societal action, therefore, determines rights and duties
and rights and duties determine legal personality.
3 GRAY, THE NATURE AND SOURCES OF THE LAW (2nd ed. 1921)27; SALMOND, JURISPRUDENCE (5TH ed. 1916)
272; HOLLAND, JURISPRUDENCE (9th ed. 1900) 88; POLLOCK, A FIRST BOOK OF JURISPRUDENCE (1928) 114.
courtesy of druannajohnston@gmail.com and http://creditdiamondnetwork.socialgo.com/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
PLEASE NOTE – IN ORDER TO FIND YOUR OBLIGATOR SEARCH SEC RECORDS AND COMPREHENSIVE
ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORTS FOR LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL POSITIONS AND HAND WRITE THE
courtesy of druannajohnston@gmail.com and http://creditdiamondnetwork.socialgo.com/
FORCE IN EFFECT: Safe Harbor Provisions, Sinking Fund Provisions, Banking Act of 1933, Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Trust Indenture Act
of 1939, & UNCITRAL Convention on International Bills of Exchange and International Promissory Notes; UNCITRAL Convention on Independent
Guarantees and Stand-by Letters of Credit; UNCITRAL Convention of Assignment of Receivables. Maritime Lien, Title 46 USC 31343 and Article 1
and Article 5 of the International Convention of Maritime Liens and Mortgages 1993 (UN) Geneva
MATTERS OF INTEREST
Involuntary Use. FIRST MIDDLE LAST am subject to involuntarily force to use Public Funds in both
Units of Account and Units of Exchange such as Legal Tender Currency Notes known as Federal Reserve
Bank/System notes, commercial liability instruments and electronic liability transactions as part of a
scheme to compel the principals to impart artificial commodity value to the liability per evidence thereon,
on the authority of MacLeod v. Hoover, No. 26395, S. Ct. (La.), 105 So. 305 (1925). That court cites U.S.
Bank v. Bank of Georgia, 23 U.S. 333 (1825) and Public Law 97-248 (1982).
Legal Tender No Longer Required. In light of the holding of Guaranty Trust Co. v. Henwood, 307 U.S. 247
(1939), take notice of.….. “As of October 27, 1977, legal tender for discharge of debt is no longer required.
That is because legal tender is not in circulation at par with promises to pay credit” Baltimore and Ohio
R.R. v. State 36 Md. 519 (1872). There can be no requirement of repayment in legal tender either, since legal
tender was not loaned, nor in circulation and repayment, or payment, and need only be made in equivalent
kind; a negotiable instrument."
UCC 3-603 Clarification. "If tender of payment of an obligation to pay an instrument is made to a person
entitled to enforce the instrument and the tender is refused, there is discharge, to the extent of the amount
of the tender..." and:
OREGON UCC ORS 81.010. "Effect of unaccepted offer in writing to pay or deliver. An offer in writing to
pay a particular sum of money or to deliver a written instrument or specific personal property is, if not
accepted, equivalent to the actual production and tender of the money, instrument or property." (This
statute operates in other states via the rule of Para Materia.)
WHEREFORE: First Middle Last, Secure Party can only discharge such debt/liability due
to the fact that the STATE OF STATE removed the constitutional money that was to
circulate within the State of State whereby the undersigned could “pay debts by law”
and the undersigned herein has been estopped in law from paying debts “at law”. Since
the STATE OF STATE is a “federal unit,” it would be a violation of commercial 'due process' or
'fraud' to bar the undersigned from accessing the remedy provided by Congress to discharge
debts (liabilities) `dollar for dollar'. Dyett v. Turner, Warden, Utah State, 20 Utah 2d 403 (1968).
The Re-port Under Safe Harbor Rules (26 CFR 1.671-5) • The Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies 26 CFR 301.7430-1 • The
Bond of the Public Servant for the Forward of all bonds to the United States Treasury and to stay in honor as successor. 18 US Code
2071, 2073, 2075, and 2076,
Re-port of Violations Through The Identification of Terrorist Acts and Piracy In Commerce The Patriot Act 2001 Subtitle A
invoking 31 USC 5318, Evidence the Special Maritime Jurisdiction Title 9 §1, Title 1 §3, Provide Remedy For Plunder of
Distressed Vessel 18 USC 1658 • Acceptability of Individual Surety, FAR 28.203, 28.201 • Acceptance of the Default Offer by The
Public Servant’s Bond Confession through Tacit Agreement FAR. 52.228 - 13(a) • Stipulation of Forfeiture Proceedings and Audits
By Inspector General FAR Part 42, 7 USC 56,
http://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/what-is-the-stamp-on-the-promissory-note-that-wasn-60407.html