gatekeepers support the butchery of the Afghanistan war. The Wiki-Leaksand other sources conclusively prove the war crimes going on inAfghanistan. They can talk about gung ho tripe, but when you see childrengetting their body parts destroyed, there is nothing gung ho about it. It’snothing more than a representation of evil havoc under the fraudulentpromotion of “liberty” or “freedom.”
Freedom isn’t about that. It’s aboutnation by nation, people by people voluntarily fighting for God given rightswithout unjust wars.
The Pentagon can’t even account for $8.7 billion in IraqiReconstruction funds. A U.S. court charged three Army Reserve officers and twocivilians with using millions of dollars of Iraq reconstruction money for personal gain.So, crooks are robbing taxpayers to promote the war on terror. There should be anend to these wars, foreclosures should be reversed, and other policies should be donein order to improve the landscape of the USA. Do I think that the Wiki-Leaks havebeen over exaggerated by the media? Yes. Do I think this excuse the war on terror?No.Newt Gingrich is one of the slick deceiver leading the charge for the war. Hespearheaded the effort of New York to not allow a mosque to be build in NYC as alandmark status. This mosque didn’t promote violence nor even anti-Americansentiments. People opposed it because of mostly Islamophobia basically.
They don’tcare about religious freedom. That’s my opinion. A religious creed didn‘tcause 9/11. It was caused by a group of extremists facilitated by elements of the Western intelligence agencies (and these agencies used facilities to fundmany of these “hijackers“). The liar O‘Reilly can lecture about respect, butMuslims died in 9/11 too (not just non-Muslims). Respect for religiousfreedom has nothing to do with disrespecting the victims of 9/11. People maydisagree with me, but that‘s fine. The First Amendment means something andthe First Amendment isn’t religious discriminatory. The Constitution is clearon this issue. The First Amendment fully says that:
Congress shall make
no law respecting an establishment of religion
, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging
thefreedom of speech
, or of the press; or
the right of the peoplepeaceably to assemble
, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances…”
I don‘t agree with Muslim radicals, but even I know that these radicals are notrepresentative of all Muslims in the world. So, radical Muslim imperialism (nottrue Islam) is just as bad as an imperialism under any other title.So, I‘m notignorant of that situation. I don’t agree with some radical Muslim extremistNazis killingSudanese black brothers and sistersin not only the Sudan, buteven in Egypt (in a camp in Cairo including other places. The racist police of Egypt did this against Sudanese people).
The Janjaweed have abducted women foruse as sex slaves, in some cases breaking their limbs to prevent them escaping, as well as