© 2010 Lawrence Hiner & Janis Morariu
2
the various changes in the environment. Diversity of thought and skills will add tothe creativity as well as execution of innovations.(3)
Pervasive Leadership
–
recognizing and leveraging appropriate leader activity at alllevels of the organization
–
increases the quantity and quality of innovation.Workers from various departments within an organization can more readilyrecognize changes in the environment and contribute to collaborative innovation inresponse. Distinct from
–
but often parallel with
–
management, leadership alignscorporate activity with corporate vision, and elicits the highest quality productivity ina supportive, trusting, progressive, and developmental atmosphere.(4)
Converging technologies are dramatically speeding up the pace and possibilities forexpanding the global reach of collaborative innova
tion. The entire “Web 2.0”
phenomenon is dedicated to the ability to network with others, tag information to beshared with others, and provide platforms to generate solutions. Social networkingfacilities such as LinkedIn, Twitter, and Facebook, along w
ith more “traditional”
tools like email and instant messaging, are used effectively by creative teams tobridge time and distance in pursuit of truly global collaboration. On the cuttingedge, Cloud Computing and immersive 3D Virtual Social Environments (VSEs) areconverging and morphing into unique avenues to deepen the level of communicationamong and across groups who, in the recent past, would not be able to createsolutions together. These converging technologies provide not only in-worldmeeting spaces, but teaming spaces where the co-creation and testing of virtualprototypes of all aspects of business across all industries is a faster and far less costlymethod of modeling and evaluating physical solutions.
2.
Background
In 2005 (not all that long ago), Thomas Friedman told us that the world is flat [Friedman(2005)]. It was not so much that he had a brand new idea that needed to be proposed,proven, and adopted
–
Friedman really put a fine point on telling us what we alreadyknew: the rate of rampant consumerism in the industrialized nations was declining, and
the “developing world” was acquiring an
appetite for new goods and services. At thesame time, the cost of manufacturing was becoming more attractive in some parts of theworld, rather than other, more traditional venues, helping to keep product costs moderate.Exchanging products and services across international boundaries would be essential tothis new economy. Friedman gave us a common term to readily share that notion
–
the
world has indeed become “flat.”
To be sure, economic disparities and financial market crises have introduced somehills in the landscape. Energy is needed to transport people and products around theglobe
–
yet carbon fuels are increasingly costly in terms of dollars and environmentalimpact. Variances in currency value slow the stable exchange of funds betweencountries. The rise and fall of consumer confidence and spending play havoc with
production estimates. Yet, the market appears to hurtle inexorably towards “global.”
A parallel development during the late 20th and early 21st Centuries is the ever-increasing demand for innovation. With consumer variables ever-more quickly changingthe face of the market, companies need to respond ever-more quickly to those changes.