funds, and (3) violating its contract with Treasury. If Fannie Mae is considered a privateemployer, Ms. Herron has claims for wrongful termination in violation of public policy andtortious interference with prospective business advantage. If, in the alternative, Fannie Mae isconsidered to be a government employer, Ms. Herron has a claim regarding the violation of herconstitutional rights under the First Amendment.
Jurisdiction and Venue
This court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331.3.
Venue is proper in this jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1391.
Plaintiff Caroline Herron, a District of Columbia resident, resides at 4236Mathewson Drive N.W., Washington, D.C. 20011.5.
Defendant Fannie Mae is a government-sponsored entity located at 3900Wisconsin Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20016.6.
Defendant Eric Schuppenhauer is a citizen of the state of Virginia who currentlyresides at 43286 Warwick Hills Court, Leesburg, VA 20176. Mr. Schuppenhauer served asSenior Vice President of Credit Initiatives at Fannie Mae during the period at issue. At all timesrelevant to this Complaint, Mr. Schuppenhauer was doing and transacting business in the Districtof Columbia.7.
Defendant Nancy Jardini is a citizen of the state of Maryland who currentlyresides at 4614 Langdrum Lane, Chevy Chase, MD 20815. Ms. Jardini is the Vice President of Compliance for Fannie Mae. At all times relevant to this Complaint, Ms. Jardini was doing andtransacting business in the District of Columbia.8.
Defendant Alanna Scott Brown is a citizen of the District of Columbia who
Case 1:10-cv-00943-RMC Document 1 Filed 06/08/10 Page 2 of 39