2010-11 State Budget
General Fund SpendingGeneral Fund Revenue
* NOTE:
Fundingincludes $2.75 Billion infederal stimulus dollars.* NOTE: Revenue onlyreflects state dollars.Federal stimulus funds arenot included in this chart.
Budget Falls Short on Adequate Funding for Pension Systems
On June 30, the General Assembly passed the final spending plan for the 2010-11 fiscal year. The $28.04 billionbudget increases spending by $207 million, or 0.74 percent, over last year’s plan, and does not require any tax increases. Although it was $1 billion less than the governor had originally requested, there are several items contained in the finalplan that prevented me from supporting it.Most notably, this budget underfunds the Public School Employees’ Retirement System (PSERS) by $135 million. Forthe past several months, I have been diligently working to bring this issue to the forefront by educating my colleaguesin the House and Senate on the importance of this issue. On June 16, the House passed legislation (House Bill 2497) toaddress the long-term and short-term funding shortfalls facing PSERS; however, this bill remains in the Senate awaitingconsideration. The state cannot increase spending in other areas while shirking its responsibility to the pension system.Serious financial troubles are facing school districts and the state, which will have a negative effect on school propertytaxpayers. By artificially reducing the 2010-11 employer contribution to PSERS, the problem will only become worse.In addition, this budget relies on the federal government providing the state an additional $850 million in fundingfor Medical Assistance. This additional allotment has yet to be approved by Congress, and at this point, the full amountseems unlikely. The reliance on “phantom” revenue is of great concern because of the serious deficit that will be createdif this money does not come through. I believe it is wrong for state government to spend money it does not have.Next fiscal year, when the federal stimulus funding ends, Pennsylvania’s revenues will drop by nearly $3 billion. Wehave known since the stimulus program was enacted that it would last only two years yet overall state governmentspending has increased during this time. I believe the responsible course of action would have been to reduce spendingto prepare adequately for the financial challenges ahead.
Capital Budget Contains Questionable Expenditures
A major component of the 2010-11 state budget package is the Capital Budget embodied in House Bill 2289, whichwas signed into law by the governor on July 7. This legislation authorizes the Commonwealth to issue up to $1.55 billionin additional debt to pay for capital projects in the 2010-11 fiscal year. The Commonwealth’s total outstanding capitalprojects debt at the end of the current fiscal year will total nearly $9.6 billion.This law provides $890 million for public improvement projects, $212 million for transportation assistance projects,$200 million for bridge projects, $225 million for redevelopment assistance projects, $25 million for furniture andequipment, and $35 million for flood control projects. Among these projects are the controversial funding of $10 millionfor the Arlen Specter Library and $10 million for the John P. Murtha Center for Public Policy.To assist in financing these projects, it was necessary for the General Assembly to approve and the governor tosign House Bill 2290. This legislation amends the Capital Facilities Debt Enabling Act (Act 1 of 1999) by permitting theCommonwealth to increase its borrowing capacity by $600 million. The state’s borrowing authority was increased from$3.45 billion to $4.05 billion. This measure increases the amount of debt payments the state pays on an annual basis. According to analysis of this additional borrowing, $963 million in principal and interest will be paid over the next 20 yearsto pay off this additional debt.Additional borrowing during an economic downturn is not fiscally prudent, especially when revenues are barelykeeping pace with projections. I am extremely concerned about the Commonwealth becoming over-extended, which hasthe possibility to negatively impact taxpayers in the short term; for these reasons I could not support the Capital Budget.Detailed information about the 2010-11 state budget is available on my website,
RepGrell.com
, by reviewing the “Final Spending Plan” documents within the “Appropriations Committee” link.
Add a Comment