Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Damning Evidence of Fraud by Nils Axel-Morner

Damning Evidence of Fraud by Nils Axel-Morner

|Views: 107|Likes:
Published by Dale_Husband
An example of a global warming denialist being dishonest and incompetent in his scientific claims.
An example of a global warming denialist being dishonest and incompetent in his scientific claims.

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Science
Published by: Dale_Husband on Aug 15, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as RTF, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





http://circleh.wordpress.com/2009/11/10/damning-evidence-of-fraud-by-nils-axel-morner/{{{Nils Axel-Morner
is a global warming denialist who has claimed that sea-level rises predicted by supporters of global warming are not happening and even that sea levelswere higher in the historical past.First, check out this blog entry from Tim Lambert:http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2009/11/the_australians_war_on_science_42.php{{Category:The War on SciencePosted on: November 8, 2009 1:23 PM, byTim LambertDespite her training in law, Janet Albrechtsen was not able to figure out that theCopenhagen treaty wasn’t going to impose aCOMMUNIST WORLD GOVERNMENT,  so you just know that she has no chance in hell of understanding a scientific question.Albrechtsenclaims that it is a “fact” that “Sea levels have remained constant for the past 30 years”. Study the graph below from the CSIRO to see that measurements from tidegauges and satellites contradict this claim.So how did Albrechtsen get it so completely wrong? Well, her authority, Nils Axel-Morner, completely ignored all direct measurements of sea-level from tide gauges andsatellites. Simply really. Details ina previous post.
Graeme Readfearn (who, like Albrechtsen, works for News Limited) observes{wasn’t inquisitive enough to find out that Morner is treated like something of a joke among most oceanographers and quaternary scientists.}Albrechtsen tries to invest Morner with some authority because of his association withINQUA, but Readfearn gets a statement from the president of INQUA:[Dr Morner was, quite some time ago, president of one of INQUA’s commissions,indeed, the commission on sea-level changes. That commission no longer exists,as such, but is now part of our Commission on Coastal and Marine Processes. Dr Morner’s views concerning sea-level change are his own and are not endorsed bythe current Executive Committee of INQUA, nor have previous INQUAExecutive Committees endorsed Dr Morner’s views. On several occasionsINQUA has requested of Dr Morner that he not inadvertently represent his viewson sea-level change as if they have some connection with INQUA.] }}OUCH! How embarrassing! Oh, wait….denialists have no sense of embarrassment. Nowhere does this become more obvious than in the testimony that Nils Axel-Morner gave to the British House of Lords on March 30, 2005.http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldeconaf/12/12we18.htm{{With the TOPEX/POSEIDON satellite mission in 1992, we now have new means of recording actual sea level changes. The record from 1992 to early 2000 (Fig 4) lacks anysign of a sea level rise; it records variability around zero plus a major ENSO even in year 1997.When we three years later have the same record extended into year 2003 on the Webb, atilt has been introduced. This tilt does not originate from the satellite altimetry readings,however, but represents an inferred factor from tide-gauge interpretations. In order to get back to true satellite data, we have to tilt the whole record back to its original data of Fig4. When this is done, there is no sea level rise to be seen—only a variability around zero plus a number of high-amplitude ENSO oscillations (Fig 5). This is why I in Fig 3conclude that the sea level remained stationary at around zero for the last 10-15 years (asfurther discussed in Mörner, 2004a and 2005).The tide-gauge introduced into the satellite data on the Webb seems to violate
observational facts at sites spread all over the globe; not least our NW European datacovering both uplifted areas (Fennoscandia, Scotland) as subsiding areas (the North Sea).From 2000 to the present, we have run a special international sea level project in theMaldives including six field sessions and numerous radiocarbon dates. Our record for thelast 1,200 years is given in Fig 6. There are no signs of any on-going sea level rise. Itseems all to be a myth.}} 

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->