Journal
of
Medicinal
Chemistry
0
Copyright
1965
by
the American Chemical Society
YOLKME
,
KCMBER
APRII
26, 1965
Structure-Activity Relationships in the Field
of
Antibacterial Steroid Acids
JOSEF
FRIED,^
GERALD
Y.
I<RAKO\T-ER,
AVID
OSENTHAL,
ND
HAROLD
ASCH
Squihh
Institute for Medical Research, n'ew Brztnswick, Yew JerseyReceived November
10,
1964
The antibacterial activity
of
a variety of steroidal and triterpenoid acids has been determined using
Staph-
Activity was found to be less dependent on specific structural andAll active compounds have
n
rigid polycyclic skeleton with
ylococcus aureus
209P
as the test organism.stereochemical features than had been anticipated.a carboxyl group close
to
an oxygen function or a double bond.
Recent investigations leading to the establishnient ofthe structure of the antibiotics fusidic acid
(Ij12
el-volic acid
(11),3,4
nd cephalosporin
PI5
as tetracyclictriterpenoids closely related to the steroids have docu-mented the biological versatility of this importantnucleus
in
yet another area. The subsequent conver-sion of the structurally related triterpenoid acid eburi-coic acid itito an antibacterially active ring
A
seco-acid
(111)
by means of microbial enzymes6 has prompted usto undertake
a
broader investigation
of
the antibac-
I
I1
COOR
111,
R=H
IIIa,
R=CH3
(1)
Ben ;\Is). Laboratory
for
Cancer Research and Department
of
Bio-chemistry, L-niversity
of
Chicago, Chicago
37,
Ill.
(2)
U-.
.
Godtfredsen and
S.
Vangedal,
Tetrahedron,
18,
1024 (1962);
D.
Arigoni,W.von Daehne,
W.
0.
Godtfredsen,
A.
Melera, and
9.
Vangedal,
Ezperientia,
20,
344 (1964).
(3)
N.
L. Allinger and
J.
L.
Coke,
J.
Org.
Chem.,
26,
4552 (1961).(4) S.
Okuda.
S.
Iwasaki,
K.
Tsuda.
Y.
Sano. T. Hata.
S.
Udagawa, Y.Nakayama, and H. Yamaguchi,
Chem. Pharm.
Bull.
Japan,
12,
121 (1964).
Structure
I1
was proposed by Professor
S.
Okuda at the Symposium on theChemistry of Satural Products, Nagoya, Oct.
1964;
cf.
Abstracts of Papers,
terial properties of steroidal and triterpenoid acids.
It
seenied
at
the outset that, because of the considerabledifferences in the stereocheinistry between the naturallyoccurring antibiotics and the seco-acid
111,
the struc-tural requirements for antibacterial activity might notprove to be too exacting. This inipression gainedfurther support when considering the fact that, whilein the steroid antibiotics the important acidic functionis located at C-21 and forms part of the side chain, thebiological activity of the seco-acid
I11
is dependent
on
the presence of
a
carboxyl group at
C-3
as demonstratedby the increase in activity attending methylation of the21-carboxyl group.7 The above impressions have beenfully borne out by the data reported in this paper.It appeared iiiost appropriate to begin such a studyby preparing additional ring
A
seco-acids from a varietyof sterols and triterpenes, and to assess the influence ofthe rigid portion of the steroid nucleus and of the sidechain on biological activity. These data are suninia-rized in Table I. With the exception of compounds
1,
2,
and
3,
all
those listed in this table possess the
anti-
trans-anti
backbone characteristic of the sterols.
How-
ever, the location of the angular methyl groups varieswidely and
so
does the nature of the side chain. Withthe exception of coiiipound
8,
all of the compounds wereactive arid one can conclude from these data that con-siderable structural variation is possible without loss
of
antibacterial activity. This is particularly evidentwhen one considers the lupeol derivative
7,
whichshows the most far-reaching deviation in skeletal struc-ture.
No
attempt is being made here to evaluate thequantitative differences in activity between the variouscompounds except in those cases where only a singlesubstituent is being varied. This
is
the case
for
2,
the21-methyl ester of
1,
which shows a 30-fold enhance-ment in activity over the latter. The conclusion appearsjustified that
a
second anionic site at
a
distant part of themolecule is detrimental to activity.
It
is felt, on struc-
p.
192.
(5)
B.
hl.
Baird,
T.
G.
Halsall,
E.
R.
H.
Jones, and
G.
Lowe,
Proc.
Chem.
Soc.,
257
(1961): 16 (1963).(6)
A.
I.
Laskin,
P.
Grabowich, C. de Lisle Meyers, and
J.
Fried,
J.
Med.
Chem.,
7,
406 (1964).
(7)
The necessity for the presence of at least one carboxyl group derivesfrom the fact that the dimethyl ester of
I11
was inactive at the
100--,/ml.
level,
the highest level employed in this investigation. Similarly, reductionof bothcarboxyl groups to primary alcohols led to inactive compounds:
cf.
ref.
6.
279