Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Eugenics and Education by Ann Winfeild « Bill Ayers

Eugenics and Education by Ann Winfeild « Bill Ayers

Ratings: (0)|Views: 7|Likes:
Published by Sara Salyers
Background Document: History of Public Education
Background Document: History of Public Education

More info:

Categories:Types, Research
Published by: Sara Salyers on Aug 24, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Eugenics and Education by Ann Winfeild
As finite beings in an infinite and expanding universe, our understanding of the world is necessarily contingent, partial, andincomplete, and yet we live for the most part as if our everyday assumptions, biases, myths, and common sense are simply andentirelytrue. To say that we are—each and all of us—blind to our own blind-spots is a tautology. To take that tautology as aprovocation, as a point of departure toward upending our own orthodoxy requires curiosity and courage. Ann Winfield has anabundance of both—a lively and exquisite mind combined with a willingness to relentlessly poke around in the dark. The result is awork of power and importance—breath-taking in its reach and surprising on almost every page. Here she interrogates—through thelens of a movement and an ideology that dominated our culture for much of the twentieth century—the story of democracy, freedom,and exalted forward progress that we Americans love to tell ourselves. Written out of the official story as quackery and the handiworkof a few nut-cases, Winfield demonstrates beyond doubt that eugenics was not only respectable, mainstream science but also that itsmajor tenets were well-springs in the formation of American public schools with echoes in the every day practices of today. Formedin the crucible of white supremacy and rigid hierarchies of human value, American schools have never adequately faced that livingheritage.We no longer talk of “miscegenation” or “imbeciles,” of course, and we are likely to look upon forced sterilization and race-basedmarriage laws as archaic. But Winfield undermines any sense of smug superiority we might grant ourselves by drawing a direct linefrom those repulsive labels and practices to our own obsessions with “standards” and “accountability,” test scores and grades. Whitesupremacy surely changes its spots but it remains durable and dominant.Education, of course, is never entirely neutral—it always has a value, a position, a politics. Education—teaching and schooling—either reinforces or challenges the existing social order. For humanists and democratic educators, the largest, most generouspurpose of education is always human enlightenment and human liberation, and the driving principle is the unity of all humanity. Weembrace the conviction that every human being is of incalculable value, entitled to decent standards concerning freedom and justiceand education, and that any violations, deliberate or inadvertent, must be fought against, testified to, and resisted.The unity of human beings is based both upon a recognition of differences as well as a consciousness of our interdependence. Peopleare different—distinct capacities, unique needs—and we are, at the same time, entirely connected. In today’s world, where we seem toknow the price of everything and the value of nothing, the knowledge we lack includes an acknowledgment of the reality of our wilddiversity—something that just
—and at the same time an acceptance of our deep connectedness. The knowledge we desperatelyneed now is a knowledge based upon recognition, upon unity and solidarity.The relationship between education and freedom is deep, intrinsic, and profound—they are essentially the same thing. Both concernthemselves with the fullest expression of human development. To the extent that people reflect upon their lives and become moreconscious of themselves as actors in the world, they insert themselves as subjects in history, constructors of the human world, andthey enact and express themselves, then, as free human beings.The aim of humanistic educators is to organize schools in such a way that every member can develop and use all of his or hercapacities and powers without infringing upon the basic conditions or rights of others. The classroom becomes an association inwhich the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all.To be a good teacher in this context means above all to have an abiding faith in all students, to believe in the possibility that everyperson can create things and is capable of both individual and social transformation. Education becomes a form of reinventing,re-creating, and rewriting, and this is a task that can be accomplished only by free subjects, never by inert objects. Education, then, isa dialogical process in which everyone participates actively as equals—a turbulent, raucous, unpredictable and participatory affair.The goal of dialogue in this context is critical thinking and action—knowledge emerges from the continual interaction of reflection
Eugenics and Education by Ann Winfeild « Bill Ayershttp://billayers.wordpress.com/2008/07/03/eugenics-and-education-by-ann-winfeild/1 of 305/01/10 5:56 PM
and action.In democratic schools, an emphasis on the needs and interests of the student is co-primary with faith in a kind of robust public thatcan be created in classrooms, as well as in the larger society. To be exclusively child-centered, to the extent that the needs of the groupare ignored or erased, is to develop a kind of fatalistic narcissism; to honor the group while ignoring the needs of the individual is todestroy any possibility of freedom. This is the meaning of community, the creation of places where people are held together becausethey are working along common lines in a common spirit with common aims. These are places of energy and excitement, unlike thesites of coercion and containment that are all-too-familiar in schools: the difference is motive, spirit, and atmosphere. These qualitiesare found when people move from being passive recipients to choosing themselves as authors, actors, builders, and makers within asocial surround.When the aim of education is the absorption of facts, learning becomes exclusively and exhaustively selfish, and there is no obvioussocial motive for learning. The measure of success is always a competitive one—it is about comparing results and sorting people intowinners and losers. People are turned against one another, and every difference becomes a potential deficit. Getting ahead of others isthe primary goal in such places, and mutual assistance, which can be so natural, is severely restricted or banned. On the other hand,where active work is the order of the day, helping others is not a form of charity, something that impoverishes both recipient andbenefactor. Rather a spirit of open communication, interchange and analysis becomes a commonplace. Of course in these places thereis a certain natural disorder, a certain amount of anarchy and chaos as there is in any busy workshop. But there is a deeper discipline,the discipline of getting things done and learning through life, and there is an appreciation of knowledge as an inherently publicgood—something that can be reproduced at little or no cost, and (unlike commodities), when it’s given away, no one has any less of it. In a rational society, knowledge would be shared without any reservation or restriction whatsoever.Schools serve societies—in many ways all schools are microcosms of the societies in which they’re embedded—and they are bothmirror and window onto the social reality. If one understands the schools, one can see the whole of society; if one fully grasps theintricacies of society, one will know something true about the schools. In a totalitarian society, for example, schools would be built forobedience and conformity; in a kingdom, the schools would teach fealty. But in an authentic democracy we would expect to findschools defined by a spirit of cooperation, inclusion, and full participation, places that honor diversity while building unity. Schools ina democracy would resist the over-specialization of human activity—the separation of the intellectual from the manual, the head fromthe hand, the heart and the head, the creative and the functional—as a distortion. The goal of democratic schools would be the fluidityof function, the variation of work and capacity, the mobilization of intelligence and creativity and initiative and work in all directions.The education we are used to is only a caricature—it is not authentically or primarily about full human development. Why, forexample, is education thought of as only kindergarten through 12th grade, or kindergarten through university? Why does educationoccur only early in life? Why is there a point in our lives when we feel we no longer need education? Why again, is there a hierarchyof teacher over student? Why are there grades and grade levels? Why is there attendance? Why is being on time so valuable? Whyindeed do we think of a productive and a service sector in our society, with education designated a service activity? Why is educationseparate from production?
 Eugenics and Education
will change the way you think about curriculum and teaching, school reform, educational policy andpractice, and even the current debates concerning immigration and marriage. This is essential reading for anyone who hopes tounderstand the sorry state of our schools today, and the deep changes we must undertake to improve them. After seeing the worldthrough Ann Winfield’s eyes, when you hear the terms “gifted and talented” or “at risk” you’re likely to wince. Good.
This entry was posted on Thursday, July 3rd, 2008 at 11:17 pm and is filed underBook Reviews. You can follow any responses to this entry through theRSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Recent Posts
Inauguration 1-20-09COMIX NATIONArundhati Roy says:New Year’s Resolution…2009…miracle and wonderVote “Me” for Secretary of Education
Select Category
Eugenics and Education by Ann Winfeild « Bill Ayershttp://billayers.wordpress.com/2008/07/03/eugenics-and-education-by-ann-winfeild/2 of 305/01/10 5:56 PM

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->