Welcome to Scribd. Sign in or start your free trial to enjoy unlimited e-books, audiobooks & documents.Find out more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Banksters - Are the Predators Becoming the Prey

Banksters - Are the Predators Becoming the Prey

Ratings: (0)|Views: 538|Likes:
Published by Foreclosure Fraud

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: Foreclosure Fraud on Aug 24, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Banksters: Predators becoming Prey?
 by Joel D. HeschThanks to the financial crisis, we have a new breed of racketeer: the bankster. Crossing the line beyond aggressive accounting and fraud, banksters use full-blown racketeering practices into thefinancial arena, where they prey on unsuspecting clients. In corporations and financialinstitutions where the only concern is the bottom line, being a bankster is a badge of honor. Themoney made with these predatory financial practices is frequently in the hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars.Financial statement fraud is rampant among banksters. Some of the newer variations includechannel stuffing, where banksters offer customers discounts in the future, in exchange for accepting excess inventory now. Bill and hold allows banksters to cook the books by recordingsales now, but shipping later. Round-tripping involves selling an asset with an agreement to buythe asset (or similar item) back later. Swaps allow two companies to alter their reported revenue by selling each other nearly identical products.Of course, banksters keep using more familiar fraud practices as well. Reporting sales tofictitious customers, colluding with others to buy or sell assets above or below market values,creating multiple affiliate or shell companies or even banks are still as popular as they have beenfor decades. Most of these financial dealings are so complex there is virtually no risk of aneyebrow being raised by the Department of Justice (DOJ), IRS, or SEC.To a financial professional, everything is measured by risk versus reward. The amount of moneymade through financial fraud schemes is so astronomical that it would take a huge risk to exit.Up until now, the risk of being caught by a financial regulator has been minuscule. But theeconomic downturn and the government's two anti-fraud secret weapons has begun to tip therisk-reward calculation.It just became more profitable to prey on their fellow banksters than to seek out new victims for racketeering schemes. The government has adopted two whistleblower programs which turn upthe heat on predators by offering rewards worth up to a billion dollars simply for switching sidesand teaming up with the government.Originally, the Department of Justice (DOJ) reward program only paid whistleblowers if thegovernment was the victim of the fraud. Even if employees or fellow banksters at Worldcom or Enron had reported that those companies were preying on investors, they would not havereceived a reward. So there was little incentive to turn in a fellow bankster. Now, however, the IRS is offering whistleblower rewards. This means that if a company engagesin financial trickery that also results in underpaid taxes, a reward of up to 30% is paid for the onewho reports it. If, for instance, a manager had reported Worldcom or Enron for income taxevasion, they could have received a sizeable reward.
Recently, the new IRS reward program has been made even more appealing: the IRS will agreeto not disclose the name of the person reporting the bankster²even if they receive a $100million reward for turning in their company!The DOJ program has been around since 1986. It pays between 15 and 30 percent of what thegovernment recovers from anyone, including financial professionals who work for a predatorycompany, for their help in uncovering fraud. In the 1990¶s military contractors had to fork over nearly $5 billion to the government. In the early 2000¶s the focus was on Medicare fraud, with$5 billion recovered from pharmaceutical companies and another $10 billion from healthcare providers. As a result, the DOJ has paid out nearly $3 billion in rewards. Since the size of thereward is determined by the amount recovered, with no limit, the highest rewards are nowexceeding $150 million.When both the DOJ and IRS programs are combined, the benefits for reporting fraud nowoutweigh the risk of continuing to participate in financial fraud in the company of banksters.Unless the person reporting the fraud actually planned or initiated the fraud, they are usuallyeligible for a reward²even if they participated in the scheme.If the direct victim of the bankster scheme is the government, the person reporting the fraud cancollect rewards from both reward programs. For instance, the federal government is rapidlychumming the waters by throwing $3 trillion dollars into a dozen TARP and other bailout programs. Conservative estimates are that 10% of this money is lost due to financial fraud; thetrue figure may be as high as 30%. Mathematically, DOJ is poised to pay billions of dollars inrewards on the $500 billion being lost due to financial fraud. That means $100 billion in rewardsare possible for financial professionals who report fraud under any one of these or other federal programs. If the fraud also results in underpaid taxes, another 30% reward is possible.The DOJ and IRS are getting smart about financial fraud. They know that it takes an insider toroot out the fraud. To entice these participants to turn away from the lucrative bankster schemes,they know their best option is to offer huge monetary rewards.For example, fraud committed under TARP includes lying about collateral by overstating itsworth; using collateral already in default; using collateral from a fraudulent loan; or committing balance sheet fraud, such as hiding assets offshore, using shell banks in tax haven countries,using special purpose vehicles to hide liabilities, hiding contingent liabilities, or disguising debt.Other forms of financial fraud against the government include taking federal funds throughhidden fees; not giving credit for interest or gains; creating fake capital losses by back-datingtrade tickets; or selling fake capital losses to those who need deductions.Consider this example. In 2007, a large pharmaceutical company allegedly evaded federalincome taxes through a complex financial transaction between related entities. It transferredownership of patents to just two of its popular drug to a shell company it formed in Bermuda.The Bermuda company charged the related U.S. company huge royalties for being allowed tosell the two drugs in the United States. The U.S. company claimed large deductions for the so-called royalties expenses, thereby eliminating the amount of taxes owed. Because the companieswere related entities, the IRS argued that it could pierce through the transaction and ignore the

Activity (7)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
SvetoslavDimov liked this
SLAVEFATHER liked this
SLAVEFATHER liked this
theduckman liked this
AuditLoans liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->