You are on page 1of 1

Comparative Analytical Study of Seismic

Response of steel, Concrete and Composite


Shear wall Building
M.N.Nimodiya (M.tech Student, L.D.College of Engineering, Ahmedabad )
and Prof. B.J.Panchal, Asst. Prof. L.D.College of Engineering,Ahmedabad

Abstract— Engineers are familiar with the problems involved in constructing either steel or
concrete building, as each of these materials has its own peculiarity. Steel structural members
are generally fabricated as component consisting of thin plate elements, so they are prone to
local and lateral buckling. Therefore they are checked for the failure due to buckling and
instability, while concrete structural members are generally thick and unlikely to buckle, but
they are inclined to creep and shrinkage with time. Therefore a system comprising of steel-
concrete composite structure is developed to take benefit of both the material. For building
systems, steel–concrete composite structures are known as the most economical solution to
the diverse engineering design requirements of stiffness and strength. In the present work all
three types of building as mentioned above i.e. steel, concrete and composite multi storey
buildings are modeled in ETABS 9.2 software. All three types of buildings are analyzed by
static seismic coefficient method and Dynamic Response spectrum analysis method. The
results in terms of natural period, frequency, storey displacement, storey drift, storey shear,
storey moment, storey stiffness are compared. The main objective of the present study is to
understand the seismic behavior of multistory RCC, Steel and Composite building and by that
to get an idea for choosing the best alternative for construction in earthquake prone area.

Keywords— Composite structure, Static, Dynamic, Infill wall.

You might also like