: RepVereb.com
Deadline to Apply for PropertyTax/Rent Rebate ProgramExtended
The deadline to apply for the state’s Property Tax/Rent Rebate pro-gram for 2009 is being extended from June 30 to Dec. 31, 2010.Eligible participants can receive a rebate of up to $650 based ontheir rent or property taxes paid in 2009. The program benefits eligiblePennsylvanians who are 65 years or older, widows and widowers 50 years or older, and those 18 years or older with disabilities.Eligibility income limits for homeowners are set at the followinglevels, excluding 50 percent of Social Security, Supplemental Security Income, and Railroad Retirement Tier 1 benefits:• $0 to $8,000, maximum $650 rebate (Homeowners andrenters)• $8,001 to $15,000, maximum $500 rebate (Homeownersand renters)• $15,001 to $18,000, maximum $300 rebate (Homeownersonly)• $18,001 to $35,000, maximum $250 rebate (Homeownersonly)Residents are reminded to provide all the necessary income,property tax or rental information required to process claims quickly and accurately.Property Tax/Rent Rebate claim forms are available by con-tacting my office at 610-409-2615, or by visiting my website at
www.RepVereb.com
.
In June, Sen. John Rafferty and I attended a check presentation by State Farm to the CollegevilleMain Street Program. The $3,500 check is tobe used for the State Farm Good NeighborsCurbside Appeal Program. Through this program, property and business owners in the designated Main Street district can receive a matching grant up to $500 to improve their curbside spaces withhardscaping or landscaping. I am pictured withState Farm Insurance agent Larry Hoak; LindaFlederbach, Main Street Manager; Debbie Riegner,Collegeville Ecomonic Development Corporationboard member; and Sen. Rafferty.
Budget Bill Inadequately Prioritizes Tax Dollars
Vereb votes against budget that spends too much
The 2010-11 budget that was voted on at the end of June increased state spending at a time when revenuescontinued to come in below calculations.I could not support a budget that unfairly and irresponsibly raised funds for cardboard checks and funding forpet projects, while at the same time decreased funds for vital environmental programs. Under this proposal, fund-ing for the Department of Environmental Protection took more than an 8 percent hit. Meanwhile, the Department ofCommunity and Economic Development received a 22 percent increase. It makes no sense and will hurt our state inthe long run. I think there was a much better way state tax dollars could have been more appropriately designatedin this budget.I could not, in good conscience, vote for a budget that sets the state up for failure. This budget spends too muchat a time when the state continues to face revenue problems. We face even more funding problems because thisbudget was balanced on the assumption that the state will receive more than $850 million in new federal funding,of which only approximately $600 million has been approved. An additional $250 million in cuts will now have tobe made to ensure a balanced budget. On top of that, going into the 2011-12 fiscal year, we will have to accountfor the loss of all other stimulus funds that were used to balance the budget. Altogether, the 2011-12 budget willhave to account for nearly $3 billion in exhausted stimulus funds, with no reserve funds to fall back on to help easethe budgeting process.Going forward, we need to get the state’s fiscal house in order. We cannot spend more than we are getting inrevenue. Families across the Commonwealth have had to tighten their household budgets, and it’s time for stategovernment to do the same.
Add a Comment