THE FALLACY OF A STRAIGHT LINE AND MISCONCEPTION OF BLACK “HOLES”
I have since changed some of this since I’ve written my other chaptercalled Twin Opposing Vortexes and The Illusion of Pull:http://www.scribd.com/doc/56540031/Twin-Opposing-Vortexes-and-the-Illusion-of-Pull Part of my problem understanding Dr. Hawking's model on alleged blackholes is my philosophy that nothing ever travels in a straight line and thatthere is no such thing as a “fabric of space-time.”I’m not sure if Stephen Hawking had ever exposed himself to the work of Walter Russell. All direction is curved and all motion is spiral. There is nosuch thing as a straight line in our Phi spiraling 3D void. Mainstreamscience and math is like Plato’s Allegory of the Cave.Current models only work on paper, up to a point.A prism is distributed in straight lines on a wall. But nothing in is straight inour helical reality. Rainbows are curved because the prism of the PhiSpiraling void is curved.There are no straight lines.Look at the straightest ruler you have available.Now take a microscope and look at the edge of that ruler.Is that ruler truly a straight line?No, it’s jagged. Now zoom in even further.It's made up of smaller things compacted together called atoms andmolecules.What is the shape of an atom?Oh, that’s right… no one has ever actually observed an atom.There are no pictures, nor any proof of an atom.All we are shown are computer models and 3D renderings of what peopleTHINK it looks like.Entire branches of science have been founded upon a non-observation.The structure of an atom is not some particle so dense that it pulls allthings to it… yet nothing actually touches it.There is no nucleus to an atom. It’s a void of matter as the center of ahurricane. But for fun… lets play Devils Advocate using their own models.