Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword
Like this
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Sub-Regional Housing Needs Allocation Process Technical Advisory Committee Minutes 12-14-06

Sub-Regional Housing Needs Allocation Process Technical Advisory Committee Minutes 12-14-06

Ratings: (0)|Views: 121|Likes:
Published by Sabrina Brennan
TAC 121406 Minutes
TAC 121406 Minutes

More info:

Published by: Sabrina Brennan on Sep 01, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial


Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less





Atherton Belmont Brisbane Burlingame Colma Daly City East Palo Alto Foster City Half Moon Bay Hillsborough Menlo Park
Millbrae Pacifica Portola Valley Redwood City San Bruno San Carlos San Mateo San Mateo County South San Francisco Woodside
San Mateo County
Sub-Regional Housing Needs Allocation Process
Technical Advisory Committee
Minutes from Thursday December 14, 2006 meeting
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Minutes from Thursday Nov. 30, 2006 meeting were approved.

Selection of Chair and Vice-Chair
Bob Beyer; City of San Mateo, was elected as Chair.
Meg Monroe, City of Burlingame, was elected as Vice Chair until May 2007.

Planning meeting feedback

Suggestion begin with a base number, by January 2007, allocations to come later.
Housing elements due June 2009
Draft allocation number due to ABAG - June 2007
Trading: May take place June 2007 - March 2008

• Process suggestions

1. Develop a formula to find point of reference.
2. Wait to get a number default from ABAG.
3. Jurisdiction offer their own numbers as starting point.

Clarification: Trading
Swapping units (added to base allocation) for other resources:
e.g. 100 units for $1 M

e.g. 100 units for water.
Total regional number will probably be 12,000 - 18,000 projected number’s based on growth.
HCD numbers should come out in March

Our share will be based on growth and projections 2007

In RHNA 3, the number was 16,305
- We have used 9,338 units thus far
- 18,000 - 7000 = 11,000 additional (est number) (remaining) units to plan for

San Mateo County built 52% of what was allocated, assuming a family of 3
- Very low - below $50,900

- Low
- Moderate
- Above Moderate

Question: Should we use Bay Area numbers or SMCO numbers for income?
Former formula for calculating incomes

50% weight on Bay Area average
50% on what already exists
Now simplified to only Bay Area average.

Draft Methodology
Process has been “bottoms -up” thus far jurisdictions come up with number’s
ABAG has requested process for dealing with a shortfall in numbers
• Proposals
a. Mark’s plans 1
b. Mark’s plan 2 - refer to Projections to make up difference
Methodology Proposals
Start with Projections 2007
Could remove percentages of affordability from draft? (Needs to be ABAG calculation of income

breakdown completed by 12/31.)
a. Base numbers on ABAG’s current methodology.
b. Base numbers on ABAG’s former methodology.
c. Base numbers on County number’s.

Suggestion: Use ABAG number’s for income levels
Other methodologies
Use Projections 2007

You're Reading a Free Preview

/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->