Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Good Alder Simon Cassio, Prince of New York City, Primus
and Judex of the Northeast, and Warminister of the Senate.
Introduction 6
6
I. The Invictus must be respected.
(traditional)
7
privileges, and those who know themselves to be Invictus are of
greater rank than those who do not.
8
To be Unconquered is to garner respect from those around you, be
they peers within the frst estate or the drab outside of it. We are
respected because of who we are, but more because of what we do.
Our eforts are recognized by others as well as our own, and
therefor we are well received.
9
It is in this success, and adhering to this success, that the other
covenants look to us as the example of how society should be. It is
in this success that we continue to prove that traditional methods
work, and overcome the modern nuances found in the Movement.
It is in this success that we are both feared and loved by all. Other
covenants should look to us and desire to either be one of us or to
be led by us in the capacity in which we excel. In this success, we
are respected.
One of the relevant social rules is that those who are respected are
not attacked. Attacking someone who is respected results in swift
reprisal by everyone else who is also respected; after all, should
they fail sufciently to respond, they know it might very well be
10
they who are attacked next. Imagine the prosperity and mutual
defense of an entire covenant of kindred who declare that by
joining them, anyone can become respected, and gain access to
that defense. This would be a formidable group indeed, and so it is
no surprise that the Invictus is the foremost covenant on earth.
There are several things that must be noted about this process.
The Judex chooses to declare Monomacy or not - the parties
merely request it. One does not challenge another to Monomacy.
Neither must the other party accept - if the Judex fnds the insult
grave enough to warrant Monomacy, neither party may escape
adjudication by merely refusing to participate. If they wish to
avoid the risk of immediate destruction, the disputant must ofer
terms reasonable enough to persuade the Judex to make their
opponent accept those instead of combat.
11
II. The Invictus must maintain order.
(traditional)
Order is our purpose above all others. Without order, the niceties
of society are meaningless, having been drowned out by the blood-
dimmed tide. Remember always that only we, the frst estate, have
this dedication to order. We dedicate ourselves as no other
covenant does to the safety of all kindred. Only we, of all kindred,
say "frst the Masquerade, then everything else". This dedication is
honorable, and all Invictus must take due pride in it.
12
The Invictus must act for the purpose of creating and maintaining
order. In doing so we see to the greater good of all; without order,
society turns upon and devours itself. This necessitates both
understanding and sacrifce.
Once one realizes that one may not be suited for every task
necessary to institute and maintain order, one must also realize
that sacrifce is necessary. Chiefy, I speak of personal sacrifce.
This is not to say one must surrender one's life, but that one must
be willing to surrender one's position and glory in the service of
the greater good. Again, using the most commonly discussed
confict, one who could bid for leadership and who comes to the
realization that he or she is not best suited for leadership must
then sacrifce immediate designs on leadership so that order may
be rendered.
13
I would hope that the reader realizes that these examples examine
the near term, and that as the depth of the analysis of any given
situation is expanded (that is to say, how far into the future one
wishes to create and/or maintain order), and that as the breadth of
the analysis of any given situation is expanded (that is to say, the
swath of society one wishes to afect), the situation becomes more
complex. The greatest danger is not the complexity that is born
from a full analysis, but that what must be done to create and
maintain order may vary, thus coming in confict and potentially
creating chaos if one is not both aware and willing.
There is a system that is greater than any one individual, and that
system has proven time and again, over thousands of years, that if
you go against the system, the system will go against you. Over
that time, the Invictus has learned that we do not control the
system, we simply recognize that a machine that is well-oiled
functions better than one that is not.
14
III. The purpose of power is power.
(traditional)
Power is a tool. The purpose of that tool is to better the tool itself.
It can be seen as a pathway to money, blood, control, and many
other things. Each of these in turn is something that may be
wielded in the pursuit of power. One must never forget that the
veneer, no matter how enthralling, is simply a distraction from the
true purpose of all things: power. Even though it may not be
readily apparent, each tool may be leveraged to one’s advantage,
and thus be used in the pursuit of power. When you wield a tool,
do so with knowledge of this true purpose.
Find any force in nature that exists for some purpose other than to
exist. The Sun does not shine on the Earth because the Earth pays
taxes. Gravity does not pull down because it is angry at the sky.
Power and authority exist for no other purpose than to be those
things. Others will gravitate or be repulsed by these concepts, but
they will continue to persist despite any resistance.
15
This particular proverb has been used to justify any and all
pursuits of power, whether they are wise or not. I do not believe
this traditional quote is a justifcation, however, but rather an
explanation of our values.
16
IV. Rank has its privileges.
(traditional)
17
The etiquette of tradition lends to precedence. Those who have
fought, bled, battled, politicked, ingratiated, or otherwise made a
name for themselves will be honored in our words, actions, and
deeds. What culture does not have rewards for those who have put
in time and efort? Should the Invictus be no diferent?
18
privileges that higher rank ofers, and through such encourage
better members of society.
Too often this statement is used to oppress those who are viewed
as unworthy (be that because of birth, wealth, station, etc). And
while these diferences do exist without question, this maxim
should not be used to rationalize cruelty, tyranny, or subjugation.
Instead it should act as a reminder of the blessings we have
received as Invictus and why we, more than any other covenant,
are aforded opportunities for kindness, compassionate leadership,
and charity.
19
V. The Invictus has no secrets.
(The Rt. Hon. Alder Cadeyrn)
Of course we have our secrets. The one who claims there are no
secrets is the one who hides the most.
In its best possible light, this statement provides that we are the
most open of all covenants. This is not to say that we accept all,
but rather that we act more openly than others. We have long
since realized that open displays of power are potent tools and the
20
more omnipresent they are, the better.
Each member of the Invictus, due to the very nature of our ability
to lead and pursue leadership and power, is a public fgure. A
spotlight has been shined on each of us as politicians and
diplomats, experts and leaders. We live in glass houses.
Every kindred has personal secrets. This is true, and no one would
dispute this. However, the Invictus politics of leadership are no
secret. We all adhere to the tried and true methods of tradition
and etiquette in all things. Each covenant can look at us and know
exactly what we believe; each covenant can look to us and not
have to wonder about our philosophy, political structure, or
confict resolution procedure. We are emulated by other
covenants, even by those who do not stand by either tradition or
propriety.
21
Of course we have our secrets. We have secrets even from our own
membership. This statement is merely an elder's attempt to keep
the neonates content in their belief that they are not missing out
on the things we have kept from them.
If, for example, you believe the prince of your city has made a poor
decision, criticizing him or her in public would undermine the
authority of the praxis, potentially destabilizing the city, and
would require retribution. Going to that same prince privately,
however, and ofering your concerns and critique would not be an
ofense; in fact, if you are an Advisor, it is your duty to do so.
What I think Alder Cadeyrn actually meant is that, more than any
other covenant, we are predisposed toward working with those not
among our ranks. The Invictus exists to lead, yet we lead not
because we are more worthy than other covenants but rather
because we are better connected, better organized, and broader-
minded. We share knowledge, we share success, and we share the
benefts of living in a stable and safe society.
Let others have their secrets. I am Invictus and I have no time for
them.
22
VI. The Invictus must protect its fock lest it lose
its ability to exploit it.
(traditional)
This is simply one of many ways in which one may perceive the
patronage system. One must protect all who serve lest one lose
their services. Such service may be passive, as is often the case
when one speaks of the fock, or such service may be active, as is
often the case with vassals. In all cases, the lord has a duty to serve
his people just as they have a duty to serve him. This symbiotic
synergism is one of the greatest strengths of the Invictus.
Mortals are power. The best of us have long since passed the time
when we can talk to men directly without killing them. As long as
we allow humanity to run the world, we will need to protect the
best of them to serve us, and to one day become us.
Patrons and clients, lieges and vassals, shepherds and sheep: this is
the kind of language which opponents of traditional society fxate
upon when they criticize us.
Yet who can dispute that the responsibility of the shepherd to the
sheep is far greater than the responsibility of the sheep to the
shepherd? This is, in fact, the greatest merit of the patronage
system: that when one joins the Invictus, one gains a powerful ally
and mentor who is personally invested in your growth and
development. Who else can boast this?
23
VII. The Invictus is a covenant of faith.
(The Rt. Hon. Alder Cadeyrn)
The Second Estate has its various creeds and interpretations. The
Ordo Dracul has its books and philosophies. The Acolytes have
their pantheon of deities and the Carthians have no deities at all.
The one article of faith that the First Estate has is a shared service
towards something better, toward the dream of a world that is civil
and secure and ordered. Each Unconquered serves this dream in
his or her own way, and it is this collective act that makes us
divine.
Alder Cadeyrn and I did not always see the world in the same
light. He was as stone where I am as water. However, in the matter
of faith we agreed.
24
The Acolytes and the Sanctifed see their faith rewarded
constantly, so constantly that one might argue there is no faith but
instead formulaic science. The Invictus, conversely, have no such
formula; we have no security blanket to assuage our concerns and
fears. Instead, we have our faith.
Almost inevitably there comes a time when one betrays the faith
we all place within them. It may come from a broken promise or a
broken oath. No matter the fne words that spill from lips when
this is done, there is never any true excuse that justifes breaking
one's word. Even if one breaks one oath to uphold another, even if
one were to save the universe through the act of breaking their
oath, they have failed and they have spat upon our faith. Where I
could thank such an individual for such actions as they might have
beneftted me, I would also know that I could no longer trust
them; they would be lesser in my eyes.
25
VIII. The Invictus is Society. All of it.
(Pillar Leon Vogel)
All who seek civilized society can fnd it within the Invictus. All
who seek to become part of civilized society act as if they were
Invictus. The Invictus is the pinnacle of society, and represents
what society is in its most proper form. All others are merely sad
attempts to achieve what we already have.
26
them special, something that sets them apart, but they are wrong.
All that these covenants have to ofer is found within the Invictus.
Each can be defned within the various functionary positions that
we, the Invictus, have given society. We have those who investigate
kindred nature, we have those who chase spiritual pursuits, we
have those who question philosophy, and we have more. Each has
its place within the Invictus, and if an individual's pursuits have
impact and meaning, they shall be adopted within the Invictus as
sound refnements. When one chooses to defne oneself as apart
from the Invictus, however, all one accomplishes is to defne
oneself in relation to the Invictus. Not all realize their position,
just as not all realize they have the potential to be so much more.
27
IX. Nobility is in the blood we take
and the blood we keep,
the blood we spill
and the blood we seek.
(traditional)
This proverb does not tell us that nobility is literally in the blood
per se, but that we must treat all things with the respect owed to
their station, be it above or below our own. How one behaves,
how one treats the metaphorical blood they take, keep, spill, or
seek is refective not only of the value of said blood, but of oneself,
as well. By every action, by every thought we judge others and
ourselves; if every action is not bent towards the higher ideal, then
it is degraded.
28
We are predators. There is nobility in that. There are those who
hunt with such ideals in mind. There are others, less savory, less
appealing to the eye, who cherish the tenants of blood in the most
primal and unspeakable ways, but as Unconquered, I consider
them beautiful none the less.
-Mister Clement
So ignore anyone who tells you that being Invictus is akin to being
a noble or belonging to a gentry class, or that this gives you
privileges over other covenants. Our roots, and our duties, reach
far deeper than that.
29
X. This Covenant is a relic, a memory of what it
briefy was and what it can still be.
(Alder Quintus of Alexandria)
The Estate is not what it once was because the world is not what it
once was. Yet since the fall of the Camarilla, the Unconquered
have survived for nearly two thousand years without the
protection of the Legio Mortuum or any other power, and during
that time we have remained true to our traditions, our oaths, and
our way of life. We are not a relic, we are a sustained tradition, and
by honoring our history we build a new memory that will survive
long after we are gone.
30
Yet, the covenant is not transitory. Individual kindred within the
covenant can fail, can misinterpret the philosophies of the
covenant, and can even go against the covenant, but the covenant
itself is immutable. We are stability. We are society. We are
Unconquered. It is not a choice. One does not decide to be
Invictus. One either is or is not.
31