Excellence is the gradual result of

always striving to do better.

Pat Riley
 School District of
Cheltenham Township
Made

AYP
2009 - 2010
HITTING THE TARGET
13 / 13

CE GE ME WE

25/25 16/17

EP
EP CBK CHS
Target #1 Attendance/Graduation
Attendance Threshold is 90%
Graduation Threshold is 85%

Cheltenham Elementary 96.24%

Glenside Elementary 96.19%
Myers Elementary 95.97%
Wyncote Elementary 96.20%
Elkins Park 96.28%
Cedarbrook 96.19%
Cheltenham High School 97.82%
 Target #2 Participation
Participation Threshold is 95%

Math% Reading%

Cheltenham Elementary 100% 100%

Glenside Elementary 100 99.3
Myers Elementary 100 100
Wyncote Elementary 100 98.6
Elkins Park 99.6 99.7
Cedarbrook 99.7 99.9
Cheltenham High School 98.4 98.2
 Performance Targets

Targets 2008, 2009 and 2010

Reading 63% Proficient/Advanced
Math 56% Proficient/Advanced

Targets 2011
Reading 72% Proficient/Advanced
Math 67% Proficient/Advanced
 Cheltenham School District 2010

Reading Math
Cheltenham Elementary 75.9 87.0
Glenside Elementary 82.0 91.0
Myers Elementary 90.5 95.9
Wyncote Elementary 90.9 95.2
Elkins Park 69.9 76.8
Cedarbrook 88.6 85.4
Cheltenham High School 75.7 65.1
 PSSA PROFICIENCY
Reading Threshold ~ 63%
Past Five Years ~ All Students
(IN PERCENTAGES)

Year 3-5 6-8 9-12

2006 76.8 78.7 71.4
2007 76.7 77.9 69.5
2008 75.6 82.7 60.4
2009 79.9 80.7 80.6
2010 76.2 82.7 74.9
 PSSA PROFICIENCY
Reading Threshold ~ 63%
Past Five Years ~ African American Students
(IN PERCENTAGES)

Year 3-5 6-8 9-12

2006 64.7 59.3 49.7
2007 62.8 63.8 47.7
2008 59.5 70.5 35.0
2009 65.4 70.2 66.4
2010 63.7 70.8 60.9
 PSSA PROFICIENCY
Reading Threshold ~ 63%
Past Five Years ~ Students with an IEP
(IN PERCENTAGES)

Year 3-5 6-8 9-12

2006 39.9 36.0 N<40
2007 39.9 43.3 26.7
2008 30.2 47.6 24.5
2009 38.6 41.6 N<40
2010 28.6 49.0 30.6
 PSSA PROFICIENCY
Math Threshold ~ 56%
Past Five Years ~ All Students
(IN PERCENTAGES)

Year 3-5 6-8 9-12

2006 77.4 69.5 60.1
2007 83.6 71.5 61.5
2008 85.3 74.5 55.9
2009 87.2 80.9 70.3
2010 84.8 82.5 64.5
 PSSA PROFICIENCY
Math Threshold ~ 56%
Past Five Years ~ African American Students
(IN PERCENTAGES)

Year 3-5 6-8 9-12

2006 66.9 46.2 34.1
2007 71.4 55.3 35.9
2008 75.4 57.5 34.2
2009 77.9 70.7 53.1
2010 75.3 71.6 41.4
 PSSA PROFICIENCY
Math Threshold ~ 56%
Past Five Years ~ Students with an IEP
(IN PERCENTAGES)

Year 3-5 6-8 9-12

2006 42.5 33.3 N<40
2007 53.7 36.0 24.5
2008 44.4 35.4 14.3
2009 53.2 38.8 N<40
2010 50.0 45.8 24.5
 CHELTENHAM ELEMENTARY
MATH Performance Target =56%

YEAR GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006 3 90 90 90 44
2007 3 86 74 100 40
2008 3 91 88 96 46
2009 3 96 94 100 50
2010 3 85 73 93 13
2006 4 83 74 94 44
2007 4 67 57 82 35
2008 4 90 79 100 54
2009 4 80 72 97 44
2010 4 88 79 97 25
CHELTENHAM ELEMENTARY
MATH
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
BLACK ~ 3rd WHITE ~ 3rd
BLACK ~ 4th WHITE ~ 4th
 GLENSIDE ELEMENTARY
MATH Performance Target =56%

YEAR GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006 3 94 92 97 78
2007 3 88 76 97 40
2008 3 87 67 96 33
2009 3 89 85 90 46
2010 3 91 90 92 23
2006 4 86 68 95 58
2007 4 94 93 94 80
2008 4 89 80 97 25
2009 4 85 70 94 50
2010 4 90 82 98 50
 GLENSIDE ELEMENTARY
MATH
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
BLACK ~ 3rd WHITE ~ 3rd
BLACK ~ 4th WHITE ~ 4th
 MYERS ELEMENTARY
MATH Performance Target =56%

YEAR GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006 3 87 74 92 67
2007 3 92 84 95 55
2008 3 89 79 97 55
2009 3 100 100 100 100
2010 3 93 88 100 83
2006 4 83 66 97 39
2007 4 83 61 98 70
2008 4 84 66 97 36
2009 4 89 77 100 63
2010 4 97 93 100 100
 MYERS ELEMENTARY
MATH
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
BLACK ~ 3rd WHITE ~ 3rd
BLACK ~ 4th WHITE ~ 4th
 WYNCOTE ELEMENTARY
MATH Performance Target =56%

YEAR GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006 3 84 74 94 53
2007 3 86 74 96 67
2008 3 75 53 97 25
2009 3 96 97 94 90
2010 3 91 81 100 71
2006 4 94 83 100 89
2007 4 88 82 93 50
2008 4 89 79 100 56
2009 4 93 88 100 75
2010 4 87 95 98 100
 WYNCOTE ELEMENTARY
MATH
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
BLACK ~ 3rd WHITE ~ 3rd
BLACK ~ 4th WHITE ~ 4th
 ELKINS PARK SCHOOL
MATH Performance Target =56%

YEAR GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006 5 69 54 81 35
2007 5 84 70 95 62
2008 5 85 80 91 53
2009 5 84 70 98 38
2010 5 75 59 92 29
2006 6 73 54 85 45
2007 6 70 54 83 41
2008 6 79 59 95 38
2009 6 82 74 89 42
2010 6 83 64 95 33
 ELKINS PARK SCHOOL
MATH
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
BLACK ~ 5th WHITE ~ 5th
BLACK ~ 6th WHITE ~ 6th
CEDARBROOK MIDDLE SCHOOL
MATH Performance Target =56%

YEAR GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006 7 71 52 83 24
2007 7 71 53 85 36
2008 7 72 57 85 32
2009 7 81 65 84 38
2010 7 84 79 91 56
2006 8 70 44 90 33
2007 8 75 60 85 33
2008 8 76 59 87 34
2009 8 83 75 90 39
2010 8 87 76 96 50
 CEDARBROOK MIDDLE
SCHOOL
MATH
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
BLACK ~ 7th WHITE ~ 7th
BLACK ~ 8th WHITE ~ 8th
 CHELTENHAM HIGH SCHOOL

MATH Performance Target =56%

YEAR GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006 11 60 34 76 17
2007 11 63 38 80 29
2008 11 57 34 72 16
2009 11 71 54 82 21
2010 11 65 42 87 27
CHELTENHAM HIGH SCHOOL
MATH
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

BLACK ~ 11th WHITE ~ 11th

 CHELTENHAM ELEMENTARY
READING Performance Target =63%

YEAR GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006 3 77 70 90 33
2007 3 83 74 96 27
2008 3 78 73 83 31
2009 3 82 74 94 29
2010 3 74 61 82 0
2006 4 79 67 92 44
2007 4 70 52 87 24
2008 4 88 76 96 54
2009 4 76 69 89 31
2010 4 77 69 91 39
CHELTENHAM ELEMENTARY
READING
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
BLACK ~ 3rd WHITE ~ 3rd
BLACK ~ 4th WHITE ~ 4th
 GLENSIDE ELEMENTARY
READING Performance Target =63%

YEAR GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006 3 81 69 88 56
2007 3 95 88 100 80
2008 3 82 57 92 42
2009 3 84 70 91 46
2010 3 85 76 94 20
2006 4 80 64 88 42
2007 4 85 74 91 60
2008 4 83 67 97 25
2009 4 74 50 90 21
2010 4 78 70 85 21
 GLENSIDE ELEMENTARY
READING
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
BLACK ~ 3rd WHITE ~ 3rd
BLACK ~ 4th WHITE ~ 4th
 MYERS ELEMENTARY
READING Performance Target =63%

YEAR GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006 3 75 48 88 44
2007 3 87 72 92 36
2008 3 87 71 100 27
2009 3 87 79 89 40
2010 3 83 77 97 50
2006 4 81 60 94 31
2007 4 80 61 96 50
2008 4 77 53 97 18
2009 4 85 79 97 38
2010 4 91 83 96 73
 MYERS ELEMENTARY
READING
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
BLACK ~ 3rd WHITE ~ 3rd
BLACK ~ 4th WHITE ~ 4th
 WYNCOTE ELEMENTARY
READING Performance Target =63%

YEAR GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006 3 80 69 91 57
2007 3 80 61 92 33
2008 3 75 53 94 25
2009 3 92 85 100 90
2010 3 87 77 100 57
2006 4 83 71 92 68
2007 4 87 77 97 50
2008 4 74 52 93 11
2009 4 84 69 97 60
2010 4 93 86 95 63
 WYNCOTE ELEMENTARY
READING
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
BLACK ~ 3rd WHITE ~ 3rd
BLACK ~ 4th WHITE ~ 4th
 ELKINS PARK SCHOOL
READING Performance Target =63%

YEAR GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006 5 77 65 86 33
2007 5 67 49 82 35
2008 5 69 55 85 33
2009 5 75 54 97 32
2010 5 64 43 85 12
2006 6 78 62 89 53
2007 6 79 66 90 48
2008 6 80 62 93 31
2009 6 78 70 90 38
2010 6 72 50 96 31
 ELKINS PARK SCHOOL
READING
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
BLACK ~ 5th WHITE ~ 5th
BLACK ~ 6th WHITE ~ 6th
CEDARBROOK MIDDLE SCHOOL
READING Performance Target =63%

YEAR GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006 7 81 72 87 37
2007 7 72 52 88 38
2008 7 83 73 92 51
2009 7 77 59 94 40
2010 7 86 78 95 52
2006 8 80 60 95 37
2007 8 83 74 90 47
2008 8 87 79 95 56
2009 8 88 86 87 55
2010 8 93 86 98 69
 CEDARBROOK MIDDLE
SCHOOL
READING
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
BLACK ~ 7th WHITE ~ 7th
BLACK ~ 8th WHITE ~ 8th
 CHELTENHAM HIGH SCHOOL

READING Performance Target =63%

YEAR GRADE % PROFICIENT % BLACK % WHITE % IEP

2006 11 72 50 86 24
2007 11 69 49 83 29
2008 11 61 35 82 22
2009 11 81 67 93 29
2010 11 76 62 91 33
CHELTENHAM HIGH SCHOOL
READING
100
80
60
40
20
0
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

BLACK ~ 11th WHITE ~ 11th

Cheltenham High School Initiatives
• Principal meetings with Math and English Departments
– Increased focus and awareness of IFOM
– Math and English teacher meetings by course on monthly basis
to review curriculum and adjusting instruction
– Greater focus on Performance Tracker to review data for 9th,
10th and 11th grade curriculum
– Reading and Math Across the Curriculum
– Benchmark Assessments
• Testing all students consistently for all 3 tests
• Instructional adjustments made based on data - DI
• Weekly teachers meeting to review data and adjust instruction
• Improved testing in Algebra 1 and Geometry
– Teachers will meet monthly and/or during common planning
periods to review and adjust curriculum
CHS Initiatives Cont.
Math
• Problem of the Week
• Algebra II Scope & Sequence updated
English
• Increased use of Teen Biz with new reading
specialist
• Cross departmental activities
CHS Initiatives Cont.
Student Voices – Increased engagement activities
with 11th grade student groups
• Early meetings beginning 2nd week in September
• Meet with student leadership groups – October and
then throughout the year
 Homeroom visits beginning in January
 Exploring new incentives and motivation activities
• Meetings with each individual 11th grade student
and team assistant / vice principal, guidance and
counselor
• Student Leadership Conferences
CHS Initiatives Cont.
• Monday Meetings expanded to include
teachers and students
• Presentations at PTO Meetings
• Vertical team meetings between CBK and
CHS teachers
 Elkins Park School Initiatives
5th Grade Schedule closer to 4th grade
experience
▪ Core Extension
▪ Reading Classes Restructured – Guided
Reading Focus
▪ Student Movement between classes
▪ Specialist attached to grades
▪ School Climate to Bridge K-4 to CBK
▪ “Upper Elementary”