Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more ➡
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Add note
Save to My Library
Sync to mobile
Look up keyword
Like this
2Activity
×
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
10-09-09 Harvard Dean Martha Minow, Board of Advisors of Harvard Civil Rights Civil Liberties Law Review Asked for Acknowledgement of Receipt of Paper Submitted to the Journal.

10-09-09 Harvard Dean Martha Minow, Board of Advisors of Harvard Civil Rights Civil Liberties Law Review Asked for Acknowledgement of Receipt of Paper Submitted to the Journal.

Ratings: (0)|Views: 808|Likes:
10-09-09 Harvard Dean Minow, Board of Advisors of Harvard Civil Rights Civil Liberties Law Review Asked for Acknowledgement of Receipt of Paper Submitted to the Journal.

A Los Angeles, September 9 – In letter [1] to Harvard Law School Dean Martha Minow, Professors Lani Guinier, Randal Kennedy, and Deborah Ramirez – members of the Board of Advisors of Harvard Civil Rights Civil Liberties Law Review - Human Rights Alert (NGO) repeated its request that the journal acknowledge receipt of a paper, authored by Joseph Zernik, PhD, recently submitted to the journal, titled: Case Management and Online Public Access Systems of the Courts – An Urgent Call of Legislative Action.
Previous requests for acknowledgement of receipt by the journal itself remained unanswered. [2]
The letter also included the Abstract of the paper, which documented and opined large-scale fraud in design and operation of PACER and CM/ECF – the online public access s and case management systems of the US district courts and courts of appeals.
The paper documented a series of cases, where such systems enabled the holding of prisoners under pretense of lawfulness, the conduct of pretense court proceedings, and the issuance of pretense court minutes, orders, and judgments, as part of pretense of judicial review. The public at large, and the harmed parties in particular, could not discern such facts in the online public access systems as designed and operated by the courts.
The paper further outlined a series of necessary corrective legislative actions - first and foremost - comprehensive review and the establishment of publicly and legally accountable validation of all case management and online public access systems at the courts, jails, and prisons and with it – restoration of the clerks’ accountability for integrity of dockets and counsel appearances. The paper also noted that a Truth and Reconciliation Commission was also likely to be required. Such actions were opined as likely to restore access to the courts and the rule of law, and with it - the safeguard of Human Rights in the digital era.
The letter [1] also included the Author’s Biography. The biography was short on formal computer science training, and showed no evidence of legal education at all. However, the biography showed that Dr Zernik analyzed and opined fraud in a number of government and corporate large database systems over the past decade, and that his opinions were supported in part or in full by top experts in the relevant fields.
Dr Zernik previously opined dishonest manipulation of the online public access system of the California Commission on Teacher’s Credentialing, coordinated with destruction of electronic pupil educational records at the Special Education Department of the Beverly Hills, California, Unified School District. A lengthy double-investigation by the California Department of Education finally concluded: “The School District is out of compliance and in violation of the law”.
In early 2007, large-scale financial institution fraud was opined by Dr Zernik, enabled by EDGE - the underwriting monitoring system of Countrywide Financial Corporations, and related liabilities to the US Taxpayer at hundreds of billions of dollars were projected. Such opinions, filed then with FBI, were materialized a year later with the collapse of the Corporation, resulting in considerable losses to the US Treasury. Fraud opined by Dr Zernik regarding a number of individual underwriting records of Countrywide Financial Corporation was supported by opinions of renowned US fraud expert and litigation support consultant Robert Meister, who operates throughout the United States.
Dr Zernik also previously opined fraud in Sustain – the case management system of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. Two manuscripts authored by Dr Zernik were reviewed by Prof Eli Shamir, Department of Computer Science, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, whose contributions to computer science from its ear
10-09-09 Harvard Dean Minow, Board of Advisors of Harvard Civil Rights Civil Liberties Law Review Asked for Acknowledgement of Receipt of Paper Submitted to the Journal.

A Los Angeles, September 9 – In letter [1] to Harvard Law School Dean Martha Minow, Professors Lani Guinier, Randal Kennedy, and Deborah Ramirez – members of the Board of Advisors of Harvard Civil Rights Civil Liberties Law Review - Human Rights Alert (NGO) repeated its request that the journal acknowledge receipt of a paper, authored by Joseph Zernik, PhD, recently submitted to the journal, titled: Case Management and Online Public Access Systems of the Courts – An Urgent Call of Legislative Action.
Previous requests for acknowledgement of receipt by the journal itself remained unanswered. [2]
The letter also included the Abstract of the paper, which documented and opined large-scale fraud in design and operation of PACER and CM/ECF – the online public access s and case management systems of the US district courts and courts of appeals.
The paper documented a series of cases, where such systems enabled the holding of prisoners under pretense of lawfulness, the conduct of pretense court proceedings, and the issuance of pretense court minutes, orders, and judgments, as part of pretense of judicial review. The public at large, and the harmed parties in particular, could not discern such facts in the online public access systems as designed and operated by the courts.
The paper further outlined a series of necessary corrective legislative actions - first and foremost - comprehensive review and the establishment of publicly and legally accountable validation of all case management and online public access systems at the courts, jails, and prisons and with it – restoration of the clerks’ accountability for integrity of dockets and counsel appearances. The paper also noted that a Truth and Reconciliation Commission was also likely to be required. Such actions were opined as likely to restore access to the courts and the rule of law, and with it - the safeguard of Human Rights in the digital era.
The letter [1] also included the Author’s Biography. The biography was short on formal computer science training, and showed no evidence of legal education at all. However, the biography showed that Dr Zernik analyzed and opined fraud in a number of government and corporate large database systems over the past decade, and that his opinions were supported in part or in full by top experts in the relevant fields.
Dr Zernik previously opined dishonest manipulation of the online public access system of the California Commission on Teacher’s Credentialing, coordinated with destruction of electronic pupil educational records at the Special Education Department of the Beverly Hills, California, Unified School District. A lengthy double-investigation by the California Department of Education finally concluded: “The School District is out of compliance and in violation of the law”.
In early 2007, large-scale financial institution fraud was opined by Dr Zernik, enabled by EDGE - the underwriting monitoring system of Countrywide Financial Corporations, and related liabilities to the US Taxpayer at hundreds of billions of dollars were projected. Such opinions, filed then with FBI, were materialized a year later with the collapse of the Corporation, resulting in considerable losses to the US Treasury. Fraud opined by Dr Zernik regarding a number of individual underwriting records of Countrywide Financial Corporation was supported by opinions of renowned US fraud expert and litigation support consultant Robert Meister, who operates throughout the United States.
Dr Zernik also previously opined fraud in Sustain – the case management system of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. Two manuscripts authored by Dr Zernik were reviewed by Prof Eli Shamir, Department of Computer Science, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, whose contributions to computer science from its ear

More info:

categoriesBusiness/Law, Finance
Published by: Human Rights Alert, NGO on Sep 10, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, DOC, TXT or read online from Scribd
See More
See less

09/10/2010

pdf

text

original

 
Human Rights Alert 
PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.netBlog:
 Scribd: 
10-09-09 Harvard Law School Dean Martha Minow, Board of Advisors of Harvard Human Rights Law Review Asked for Acknowledgement of Receipt of Paper Submitted to the Journal.
Lani Guinier
Professor of LawHarvard Law School
Randall Kennedy
Professor of LawHarvard Law School
Dean Martha Minow
Dean of Harvard Law Schooland Professor of LawHarvard Law School
Deborah Ramirez
Professor of Law Northeastern University School of Law
Board of Advisers
Harvard Civil Rights Civil Liberties Law Review
RE: Request for acknowledgement of receipt of paper submitted forconsideration for publication in the Harvard Civil Rights Civil LibertiesLaw Review
Dear Profs Guinier, Minow, Kennedy, and Ramirz: As members of the Board of Advisors of the
 Harvard Civil RightsCivil Liberties Law Review,
I address you with a request that the Reviewacknowledge receipt of paper, which was recently submitted for considerationfor publication.
 
Requests addressed to the Review itself remained unanswered.
Truly, Joseph Zernik, PhDHuman Rights Alert (NGO)
____________
Case Management and Online Public Access Systems of the Courts – An UrgentCall of Legislative Action
Joseph Zernik, PhD ,Human Rights Alert (NGO)http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert
Abstract
 Digital voting machines were previously shown to be vulnerable to malfunction andmalfeasance. Papers, recently published in computer science journal, likewise,outlined the invalidity of digital case management and online public access systemsthat govern the courts, jails, and prisons in the United States, and documented large-scale abuse of such systems. Invalid case management and online public accesssystems were claimed as key to deterioration of integrity of the justice system, whichwas previously opined in official, expert, and media reports. Such systems enabled theholding of prisoners under pretense of lawfulness, the conduct of pretense court proceedings, and the issuance of pretense court records, as part of pretense of judicialreview. A series of case studies documented that the respective orders or judgmentswere either unsigned or unauthenticated in the digital case management systems,albeit, the public at large, and the harmed parties in particular, could not discern suchfacts in the online public access systems as designed and operated by the courts.Moreover, a “chain reaction” effect was documented, where the US courts, up to theSupreme Court of the United States engaged in pretense review of cases originatingfrom lower courts. Corrective legislative actions were outlined, which were urgentlyneeded - first and foremost - comprehensive review and the establishment of publiclyand legally accountable validation of all case management and online public accesssystems at the courts, jails, and prisons and with it – restoration of the clerks’accountability for integrity of dockets and counsel appearances. Full enforcement of the law was called for regarding counsel, when engaged in conduct that was opined asfraud intended to pervert justice, which was facilitated through case managementsystems of the courts. Truth and Reconciliation Commission was also likely to berequired. Such actions were likely to restore access to the courts and the rule of law,and to safeguard Human Rights in the digital era.
 
Key Words
Liberty, Access to the Courts, Human Rights, Rule of Law, Fraud, United StatesCourts, Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County, California, DigitalSignatures, Relational Databases, Functional Logic Verification, Case ManagementSystems, Online Public Access Systems, Court Dockets, Prisoners’ Registration
Author's Biography
Over the past decade, Joseph Zernik, PhD produced analyses of fraud in governmentand corporate case management and online public access systems, which weresupported in part or in full by national or international experts in relevant fields,including, but not limited to:
1) California Commission on Teachers Credentialing and the Beverly Hills,California, Unified School District – online public access system of teachers’credentials, and school district electronic pupil educational records
Around 2002 Dr Zernik filed complaint with the California Department of Educationalleging dishonest manipulation of the online database of the Commission relative tocredentials of the then Head Counselor at the Beverly Hills Unified School District,and the related destruction of electronic pupil education records in the SpecialEducation program. After about a year and a half and two investigations, theCalifornia Department of Education issued a decision: “The School District is out of compliance and in violation of the law”.
2) Countrywide Financial Corporation – EDGE underwriting monitoringsystem
In January 2007 Dr Zernik filed with FBI, Los Angeles, a complaint including analysisof EDGE – the underwriting case management system and of the fax servers of theCorporation, alleging that the systems permitted the funding of sub-prime uniformresidential loan applications (1003) with no underwriting at all, and the retroactiveconstruction of loan application files, while creating the pretense of compliance withthe law. Dr Zernik further claimed that such conduct incurred liabilities of hundreds of  billions of dollars to the US Treasury.Dr Zernik’s projection materialized a year later, with the collapse of the Corporation.FBI to this date refuses to investigate the complaint, even after inquiries by the HonDianne Watson, Senator from California, and the Hon Diane Watson,Congresswoman from Los Angeles, on FBI and US Department of Justice in thematter.Regarding Dr Zernik's opinion of fraud in particular underwriting records fromCountrywide, Robert Meister, a renowned US fraud expert and litigation supportconsultant, who operates throughout the US provided support opinions.

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->