Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
3Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Sandra Black_L1_Unit 6 Assignment B_Chapt 5_10_Case Brief

Sandra Black_L1_Unit 6 Assignment B_Chapt 5_10_Case Brief

Ratings:

2.0

(1)
|Views: 527 |Likes:
Published by LegalDoomUT
SCHOOL WORK
SCHOOL WORK

More info:

Categories:Types, Research, Law
Published by: LegalDoomUT on Sep 12, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/04/2012

pdf

text

original

 
 Sandra Black-OR Paralegal-Legal Research 1 November 13, 2009Unit 6 Assignment B Chapter 5 Case Brief 
 Citation:
Cardwell v. Gwaltney, 556 N.E.2d 953, (Ind. Ct. App. 1990)
P
arties:
Dwonna Gayle Gwaltney CARDWELL Appellant, Kenneth Wayne GWALTNEY,Appellee, No. 87A01-9002-CV-80, July 17, 1990.
Facts:
The underlying material facts show that the appellant Cardwell and the appellee Gwaltneywere divorced with Gwaltney ordered to pay child support. About a year and one half later,Gwaltney filed a petition to modify the support order based upon the reason that he had spent ayear in jail. Gwaltney sought to be absolved from the support which had accrued during that year and to have future support reduced. Cardwell and Gwaltney reached an agreement that, amongother things, excused Gwaltney from paying support for the year he was imprisoned. The trialcourt approved the agreement; however, that agreement was challenged when the county prosecuting attorney appeared in the matter and sought to set aside the agreement becauseCardwell had been a recipient of AFDC funds through the State and had assigned her supportrights. The trial court refused to set aside the earlier agreements with this appeal resulting.Even though the trial judge was prompted by equitable concerns when Gwaltney was excusedfrom paying support, the law is that any modification of a support order must act prospectively:
P
rior
P
roceeding:
The appellant agreed to excuse the appellee from child support while he wasincarcerated for a period of one year.
Issue:
Modification of delinquent support payment.
 

Activity (3)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
Milynda Johnson liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->