You are on page 1of 6

Guy Neighbors

1
# 1152003
CCA / Prisoner
LeavenworthDetentionCenter
100Hwy Terr.
Kansas66048
Leavenworth,,

UNITED STATESCOURT OF APPEALS


CIRCUIT COT]RT
FOR THE 1OTH

TJhITIEDSTATES,

Plaintiff / Appellee
10'hCir. CaseNo:
V. USDCCaseNo: 07-20073-CM
07-2AL24-CM
IN RE: GUY NEIGHBORS 08-20105-CM

Defendant I Petitioner

WITIT OF HABD{S CORPUS. INJI]hICTIVE RELIEF. AND STAY OF


EXECUTTON pF THE ORDER GIVEN ON 0712812010. BY THE
HONORABLE CARLOS MURGUIA

tPursuantto 28 USC $ 2255,FRCP Rule 651

COMES NOW on the 9ft day of August 2010, Guy Neighbors,acting as a

pro se litigant, with a Writ of HabeasCorpus,Injunctive Relief, and Stay of

by the HonorableCarlosMurguia
Executionof the orderdelivered on0712812010

with the following:

1). On the 28thday of July 2010,the HonorableCarlos Murguia gave the

Order that Guy Neighborsvoluntary allow himself to be heavily medicatedbased

upon Dr. Robert G. Lucking's evaluation.


to Carrie
2). Dr. Luckinghadtestifiedon July 27,2010'in reference

thathe had violatedFederal


Neighbors,(Guy Neighborswife and co-defendant),

rnailsto base
Law in tamperingwith the U.S. PostalservicesealedandPostmarked

his unethicalevaluationuponCarrieNeighbors.

3). This testimonywas given in front of the HonorableCarlosMurguia,the

day beforethe courtallowedDr. Lucking's evaluationreportto be usedagainstthe

co-defendantGuy Neighbors.In which shouldhavehad no probativevalue,due to

Dr. LuckingsJuly 27'hTestimony.[SeeAttach 1- July 27, Transcriptsof Dr.

Lucking l

4). During Dr. Lucking'sJuly 27'hTestimony,CarrieNeighbors(hasalready

beenfound competent3 timesby this court)specificallyquestionedI)r. Lucking

on his rationalefor his evaluationon her, in which he was not orderedto evaluate

CarrieNeiehbors,nor did he inform her shewas beineevaluated.in which he

violatedhis ethics,aswell as,privilegedmaritalcommunications,


in which he

could not definehis rationale,wherebyshowingapatternof practiceof

inconsistencies,
lack of rationaleor followingsupremecourtrules,violationsof

FederalLaw, andto improperlysecurea sellorder,,as in this case.Wherebythis is

a patternof practice.[Seeref Arizonacase:CR-}5-0099-02-PHX-MHM


order

dated 09/28/09by the Honorable Judge Mo,y H. Murguia, and I.lSv Gonzalez-
Aguilar, 446 f. Supp.2d 1099D Ariz. 2006,and LISCourt of Appealfor the B't'

Cir., Caseno: 08-3700LI.S.v HessamGhane.l

4). My counselhasfailedto representme with zeal,my competencywas

neverquestionedby any prior attorneys,Cheryl Pilatehasprejudicedmy defense

when sheprofferedto the courtagainstboth me and my wife, in which the

appointedcounselhasf-ailedto give me the basicrepresentation


in violationof my

Sixth Amendmentright. [Seeref Attach 2-letterto Cheryl Pilatefrom Gry

Neighborsl

5). After the Testimonyof Dr. Lucking on 07127DAl0,admittingro a

FederalCrime underoath,(Tamperingwith sealedand stampedmail outgoingmail

without awarrant),the USDC for the District of Kansasshouldnot haveallowed

anyfurther testimony,evaluations,or reportsby Dr. Lucking, due to now any

furthertreatment,or evaluationby Dr. Lucking is bias,prejudice,or at the very

leasttainted.WherebY,drtinjunction,and stayof executionshouldbe issuedto

preventany furtherinjury to the DefendantI Petitioner(who was alreadyfound

competentin a prior evaluationby a differentPsychiatrist).

6). The Petitioner/ Defendanthadverballyexplainedto the coufton

A7DBl2010hearingthathis counselhadadvisedhim incorrecttyon his voluntary

orderto submitto mediation.The Petitioner/ Defbndantwas orderedthat he had

10 daysto comply or he would be in conternptof cour1.The Petitioner/ Defendant


advisedthe courthe would not submitto voluntarymedication.
The Petitioner/

Defbndanthasnot actedout or shownany type of aggression,


hasno historyof

mentaldisease
or defect,hasno criminalhistorynor hashe shownany outrageous

or delusionalactivityto requireany medication,


wherebythe Petitioner/

Defbndantis requesting
thatthe l0tr'Circuitcourl of Appealsreviewthe

documentation
providedand makethe following orders:

a).Thatthe Petitioner/ Defendantscounselhasshownbiasand was

ineffectiveand failedto providethe basicrepresentation


pursuantto the 611'

Arnendmentto the U.S. Constitution.

b). Thatthe Testimonyof Dr. LuckingonA7D712010


shouldhavestopped

any furtherreports,evaluations,or recommendations,


due to his admittanceof

violationof law underoath,andthat any furtherinvolvementof Dr. Lucking is

tainted,bias,andI or prejudice,at this point andtime. [Seeref USDC Doc 174]

c). Therehasneverbeenany documentedproof of the recordbeyonda

reasonable
explanationof why anyheavyrnedicationis needed.no rationaleto

establishGuy Neighborsincompetence,
nor is thereany seriouscrime to justif,zthe

orderof heavyrnedication.

7). Whereby,an injunctionandstayof execution,until a reviewby the l0'h

CircuitCourl of Appealsto preventa miscarriage


ofjustice,aswell as,a manifest

of injustice,dueto the circumstances


in which,the Plaintiff,had not showna
justif,ringthe needfor the heavyrnedication
scintillaof evidence for the Petitioner

or a logicalrationaleasto his incompetence.


/ Def-endant

May 24,2009
8). That the Petitioner/ Defendantwas originallyincarcerated

becauseof a bondviolationto agagorderrelatedto "blast"emailto Government

agenciesredressing in which the courtstated" Mr. Neighbors


his grievances,

poseda threatof futuredefamationto Goveffrmentofflcials."Mr. Neighborshas

alreadyservedpasthis maximumtime allottedfor the crimecharged.

THEREFOREGuy Neighbors,actingas a pro se litigant,with a Writ of

HabeasCorpus,InjunctiveRelief,and Stayof Executionof the orderdeliveredon

071281201
0 by the HonorableCarlosMurguia,andPRAYS the courtreview the

attachments;a makethe determination:

That the Petitioner/ Defendantscounselwas ineffectiveand failed to

providethe basicrepresentation
pursuantto the 6thAmendmentto the U.S.

Constitution.Thatthe Testimonyof Dr. Luckingon 0712712010


shouldhave

stoppedanyfurtherreports,evaluations,or recornmendations,
dueto his

admittanceof violationof law underoath,andthat any furlher involvementof Dr.

Lucking is tainted,bias,and/ or prejudice,at this point andtirne.[Seeref USDC

Doc 174l That therehasneverbeenany documentedproof of the recordbeyonda

reasonable
explanation
or rationaleof why any heavymedicationis needed,nor is

thereanyseriouscrimeto justifo the orderof heavyrnedication.


That an injunctionis properto stopany furtherconstitutionalrights

violationsregardingordersfor immediatemedicationof the Petitioner/ Def'endant

by Dr. Lucking.
and improperfindingof incornpetence

That a Stayof Executionis properimmediatelyuntil the 10"'CircuitCourt

provided.
can reviewthe Documents,and statements

That uponthoroughreview a HabeasCorpusis neededirnmediatelyto

removethe Petitioner/ Defendantfrom careand custodyof Dr. RobertG. Lucking

FMC Butner,North Carolina.

That the Petitioner/ Defendanthasservedhis maximumtime allottedfor the

crime charged,posesno dangerto societyor himself,is not a flight risk and should

be freeon bondpendingtrial.

Whereby,for the abovestatedreasonsthe Petitioner/ Defendantis properin

his Writ of HabeasCorpus,InjunctiveRelief,and Stayof Executionof the order

deliveredon 0712812010
bv the HonorableCarlosMurguia.

You might also like