Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
6Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Zeitgeist: Addendum: The Final Cut

Zeitgeist: Addendum: The Final Cut

Ratings: (0)|Views: 185 |Likes:
Published by Timothy

More info:

Published by: Timothy on Sep 14, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

03/13/2011

pdf

text

original

 
 
Zeitgeist Addendum Exposed:
 The Final Cut
The Zeitgeist series has been controversial. Zeitgeist the documentary has been thoroughlydebunked via enumerable articles, videos, etc.
That is why it's suddenly my intension to refute itfurther with more extra information
.
Why expose it more? My justification for this action isthat 2012 is coming soon. The New Age Movement is gaining more influence, but the truthrefuting that movement is growing in leaps and bounds as well
. The truth can never die asspirituality is here and our ancestors believed in equal treatment among all peoples. Recently, therehas been religious controversies from the Mosque issue in New York City and a renewed attack onChristian doctrine in general. Therefore, it’s certainly time to present information and let peopledecide on what they desire to believe in. Fundamentally, the freedom of conscience and thefreedom of religion are vital to embrace in order to enhance legitimate human principles. I willexpose the lies of Zeitgeist that Jesus is a rehash of Horus and Jesus is non existent as a historicalfigure. This education or showing of the truth can be utilized in a great way to awaken people. Formental colonialism is just as evil as lies about religion being promoted. It's one thing to disagree witha religion.
Human beings have the right to be a Christian, not to be a Christian, or toaccept no religion whatsoever.It's quite another to lie about a religion in hatred topromote some nefarious agenda. This anti-religious hatred as shown in Zeitgeist isa kind of evil pathology that people have the right to verbally refute. For religioustyranny is just as nefarious as anti-religious tyranny
. The Zeitgeist series is inaccurate,because it falsely characterizes the essence of religions (especially Christianity) as an excuse to
 
 
promote an Utopian Society (where all nation states are absolutely abolished under the control of acashless society in a globalized system). The documentary does tell the truth about the corruptionamong the Federal Reserve and some Secret Societies. Yet, that information is permitted in the filmas a smokescreen in order to promote lies in dealing with spirituality and truth
.The 9/11 Truth Movement has been under a new attack. Bill O’Reilly is at it again. He liesand said that all 9/11 Truth activists are dangerous radicals and borderline terrorists. TheFirst Amendment gives people the free speech right to disagree with the official story of 9/11.
That isn’t some evil or sin at all.
O’Reilly tried to call Faiz Khan a threat sincehe questioned the official story of 9/11 (and Bill tried to link the Ground zero imanFeisal Abdul Rauf to Khan.
The iman worked with the FBI on its counterterrorismeffort in March of 
2003 and he talked with the Council on Foreign Relations). FaizKhan was a first responder to September 11, 2001, so he isn’t a candidate for terror or radicalism. He’s a Muslim scholar and educator 
. Khan participated in two memorialservices for the victims of 9/11 and is involved with the New York group Muslims AgainstTerrorism. We have the right to call 9/11 an inside job if we wish to. Bill O’Reilly is sodevious that he wants Khan to not be allowed within 10 miles of Ground Zero when Khanisn’t a criminal. That would be against Khan’s freedom of movement. Bill reading ateleprompter is in no position to lecture us on freedoms. O’Reilly and his ilk desires to banpeople full freedoms if they believe that 9/11 was an inside job (when Osama bin Ladennever caused NORAD to stand down, wasn’t in the planes, and didn’t collapse BuildingNumber Seven). The Zogby poll from 2006 found that 42% of Americans believe the U.S.government and the 9/11 commission covered up the truth behind the attacks. Is it possibleO’Reilly and Fox News consider millions of Americans to be dangerous radicals and wouldprevent them from traveling to Manhattan? Maybe a yellow star is in order? I don’t acceptthe false gospel of the official story of 9/11 at all. The Ground Zero controversial is notonly used to demonize Muslims and cause religious tensions. It’s a means to criminalize the9/11 truth movement and promote the contrived, evil war on terrorism.
Even Gulf of Tonkin have been proven to be a false flag attack conclusively.
The Government wasmaking the case and presenting the false evidence before the UN in trying to go ahead withthe Iraq war. This is real.
9/11 Truth is still here. There is the ninth anniversary of 9/11. Even 9/11Commissioners have issues with the current story about how 9/11 went down.The 9/11 Commission co-chairs said that the 9/11 Commissioners knew that the military officials misrepresented facts to the Commission
. The Commissionconsidered recommending criminal charges for such false statements. 9/11Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton said that he don't believe that they got everythingcorrect. The Commission in his mind was set up to fail. People have the right to keepasking questions about 9/11. The truth about 9/11 isn't over in its debate.
9/11Commissioner Timothy Roemer said that "...We were extremely frustrated withthe false statements we were getting."
9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resignedform the Commission. He said that it's a national scandal. He believed that theinvestigation is now compromised and the full story about 9/11 should be shown. TheWhite House in his mind wanted to cover up about what occurred during 9/11.
9/11
 
 
Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that:"...There are ample reasons to suspect theremay be some alternative to what we outlined in our version...We didn't haveaccess..."
He also said that the investigation depended too heavily on the accounts of Al-Qaeda detainees who were physically coerced into talking. John Farmer was theSenior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission. He led the 9/11 staff's inquiry. He recentlysaid that: "...At some level of the government, at some point in time…there was anagreement not to tell the truth about what happened.” He alsosaid“I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told aradically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years….This is not spin. This is not true.”
And hesaid: “It’s almost a culture of concealment, for lack of a better word.
There were interviews made at the FAA’s New York centerthe night of 9/11 and those tapes were destroyed
. The CIA tapes of the interrogationswere destroyed. The story of 9/11 itself, to put it mildly, was distorted and wascompletely different from the way things happened."
Intelligence officers questionedthe official story of 9/11 as well. The former military analyst and whistleblowerDaniel Ellsberg said that there could be a certain 9/11 whistleblower that is far moreexplosive than the Pentagon Papers. He accused the government of covering up about 9/11. He is open to accept accusations of government involvement in 9/11. The U.S.government did knew of 9/11 style attacks for years. This is why some want a newinvestigation into 9/11. Raymond McGovern said that the 9/11 Report was a joke. Hewas a 27 year CIA veteran. He chaired National Intelligence Estimates. He personallygave intelligence briefings to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush (theirVice Presidents, Secretaries of State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and many other seniorgovernment officials). William Bill Christison said that there is more persuasiveevidence that show that the 9/11 attacks are different from what was presented fromthe 9/11 Commission. Christison was a 29 year veteran of the CIA, a former NationalIntelligence Officer, and a Director of the CIA's Office of Regional and PoliticalAnalysis. Many intelligence people and CIA people sent a letter to Congress exposingthe omissions, errors, and serious shortcomings from the 9/11 Commission Report.CIA veteran Robert Baer said that evidence points to 9/11 having aspects of being aninside job. The Division Chief of the CIA’s Office of Soviet Affairs, who served as SeniorAnalyst from 1966 – 1990. He also served as Professor of International Security at theNational War College from 1986 – 2004 (Melvin Goodman) said “The final [9/11Commission] report is ultimately a cover-up."

Activity (6)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
MxBD liked this
glasguensis4807 liked this
georgebiker liked this
monitor2x liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->