Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
1
1
The Origins & Potentialof Food Sovereignty
Hannah Wittman, Annette Desmarais & Nettie Wiebe
 T
he global food crisis of 2007–08, marked by skyrockeing food prices, urbanfood rios and he coninued displacemen of he rural poor, was a clear indica-ion ha he dominan model of agriculural developmen has no succeeded ineradicaing povery or world hunger. In desperaion, in Haii, Bangladesh, Egyp, Wes and Cenral Africa and counless oher locaions, hundreds of housands of people ook o he srees demanding aordable food. Behind hese highly visibleevens lurks he very real and ongoing human suering caused by he lack of hakey necessiy for all human life — food. e suned growh and high moraliy raes of hungry children and he ill healh and los poenial of malnourished adulsare clear and ragic resuls of he chronic food shorages suered by an increasingnumber of people. A growing number of households and communiies fear foromorrow’s meals, even hough here may be enough food for oday. And even forhose of us whose cupboards are well socked and who have adequae incomes opay our grocery bills, here are grounds for unease abou he conen, safey andorigins of our food and he long-erm susainabiliy of our food sysem. Hence, hesecuriy, cos, safey and nuriion of food and he fuure of food producion iself are everyone’s concern. While he sudden spike in prices sparked he headlines dur-ing he 2007–2008 food crisis, he problems in he global food sysem are complex and deep-seaed. e food sysem’s vulnerabiliies, from climae change o loss of  biodiversiy o securiy of supplies, are becoming more apparen. e global foodcrisis is deepening. Wha are he possible soluions o his crisis?Some proponens of neoliberal globalizaion would have us believe ha hecrisis is he resul of shorages and marke failures. ey assure us ha he bes way o keep up wih a growing populaion is o preven naional governmens from in-ervening in he marke, focus on scienic high-ech approaches, increase produc-ion wih he adopion of geneically modied seeds (
gmo
s) and furher liberalizeagriculure and food. Bu despie having powerful advocaes and enforcers, suchas he World Bank, he Inernaional Moneary Fund (
imf
) and he World TradeOrganizaion (
 wto
) on side, hese soluions reveal a specacular failure when icomes o reducing povery and eradicaing hunger. e mos recen gures fromhe Food and Agriculure Organizaion (
fao
) of he Unied Naions indicaeha he ranks of he hungry are coninuing o swell and now encompass more
 
2 Food Sovereignty
han one billion people, an increase of over 25 percen in he number of people wihou enough food since he mid 1990s (
fao
1999, 2009), when he neoliberaldevelopmen projec was in a phase of full implemenaion.As an alernaive o he neoliberal model, peasans, small-scale farmers, farm workers and indigenous communiies organized in he ransnaional agrarianmovemen La Vía Campesina (2008a) argue ha he curren, and linked, food,economic and environmenal crises are in fac he direc resul of decades of de-srucive economic policies based on he globalizaion of a neoliberal, indusrial,capial-inensive and corporae-led model of agriculure. La Vía Campesina, formedin 1993 and now represening 148 organizaions from sixy-nine counries, has become one of he sronges voices of radical opposiion o he globalizaion of an indusrial and neoliberal model of agriculure, claiming ha “he ime for foodsovereigny has come.”Peasan movemens, urban-based social movemens, non-governmenalorganizaions (
ngo
s) and indigenous peoples have been insrumenal in putingfood sovereigny on he agenda, and consequenly, hey have succeeded in shiinghe erms of he debae around food, agriculure and rural developmen a he lo-cal, naional and inernaional levels. Because food sovereigny aims o ransformdominan forces, including hose relaed o poliics, economics, gender, he envi-ronmen and social organizaion, here will, no doub, be a long and hard sruggleo see food sovereigny become he sandard model for food producion and ruraldevelopmen. is book conribues o his sruggle by engaging in a conversaionha idenies and expands he meanings, undersandings and implicaions of foodsovereigny in an inernaional conex.
Initiating the Food Sovereignty Concept
Food sovereigny as a concep evolved from he experience of, and criical analysis by, farming peoples, hose mos immediaely aeced by changes in naional andinernaional agriculural policy inroduced hroughou he 1980s and early 1990s.e resuls of he inclusion of agriculure in he General Agreemen on Taris andTrade (
ga
) negoiaions, ariculaed in he
 wto
 , brough ino sharp relief com-muniies’ widespread loss of conrol over food markes, environmens, land andrural culures. e erm “food sovereigny” was coined o recognize he poliicaland economic power dimension inheren in he food and agriculure debae ando ake a pro-acive sance by naming i. Food sovereigny, broadly dened as herigh of naions and peoples o conrol heir own food sysems, including heirown markes, producion modes, food culures and environmens, has emergedas a criical alernaive o he dominan neoliberal model for agriculure and rade.La Vía Campesina (1996a) rs discussed food sovereigny a is SecondInernaional Conference, held on April 18–21, 1996, in Tlaxcala, Mexico. Peasanand farm leaders who gahered here no longer saw poenial in he concep of “foodsecuriy” o ensure local access o culurally appropriae and nuriious food. In
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • More From This User

    Notes
    Load more