CASE on 06/11/2009: BRIBERY 20. Here, Defendant Appellee K. M. Wilkinson and his Attorney hadno right to bribe the 11th Circuit and illegally cause the 11th Circuit to fraudulently alter the recorded final$24.30 mandate after the CASE HAD BEEN CLOSED and the 11th Circuit had LOSTJURISDICTION.2.ReplyJUDICIAL_CORRUPTION
is readingDoc 436, NOTICE OF APPEAL from fraudulent "order" (Doc. 434)JOHN E. STEELE,CRIMES, § 92.09 JOHN E. STEELE JUDICIAL CRIMES, § 92.09 1. § 92.09, Florida Statutes,stated: 92.09 Effect of reversal, etc., of judgment or successful attack on deed.--No copy of a judgmentor decree shall be admitted in evidence as aforesaid when it shall be made to appear tha24 p.
Lady Gaga, Charlene E. Honeywell, and the Wikileaks 'Source' -...
Uploaded by:Judicial_Fraud— CHARLENE E. HONEYWELL & LADY GAGAReads:224Uploaded:07/27/2010Readcast07 / 28 / 2010thedoctor2001
Comment Busse's arguments have more holes than swiss cheese. Primarily he misinterprets his plat. The"meander" lines he so relies on do not indicate a boundary. see RR Co. v. Schurmeir, 7 Wallace286 (U.S. 1868). They indicate nothing more than water is out there "somewhere". There are nosurveyors notes indicating navigability. The water as it is now is not navigable. It is, and most likelyalways
9/15/2010 thedoctor2001 on Scribdhttp://www.scribd.com/thedoctor2001 14/26