http://www.thepetitionsite.

com/1/free-fine/

Please join the Facebook Cause: FREE THE LA-FIPs (Los Angeles
Falsely Imprisoned Persons)

http://www.causes.com/causes/222335/about

INTRODUCTION - MULTI-IDIOMAS

English Intro:

Richard Fine - 70 year old, former US prosecutor, had shown that

judges in Los Angeles County had taken "not permitted" payments
(called by media "bribes"). On February 20, 2009, the Governor of
California signed "retroactive immunities" (pardons) for all judges in
Los Angeles. Less than two weeks later, on March 4, 2009 Richard
Fine was arrested in open court, with no warrant. He is held ever
since in solitary confinement in Los Angeles, California. No
judgment, conviction, or sentencing was ever entered in his case.

Richard Fine attempted to have his habeas corpus reviewed by the

United States courts, from the US District Court, through the US
Court of Appeals, to the Supreme Court of the United States;
however, all United States courts involved in the matter denied
Richard

DOCUMENTS

The two records below, produced by the Superior Court of California,

County of Los Angeles, and by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's
Department as the legal foundation for the holding of Richard Fine
are alleged as fraud, each on its own. Moreover, the production of
contradictory records by the two justice system agencies of Los
Angeles County is alleged as additional fraud to top it off.
1) View the FALSE AND DELIBERATELY MISLEADING records
provided by Sheriff Lee Baca in letter to Los Angeles County
Supervisor, Michael Antonovich, in response to request for access to
the California public records that were the non-existing warrant and
booking records of Richard Fine. For over a year, Sheriff Lee Baca
insists on providing false records - claiming that Richard Fine was
arrested on location and by authority of the "San Pedro Municipal
Court". No such court has existed for almost a decade:

http://inproperinla.com/10-01-08-antonovich-ltr-repeat-mailing-w-
attch-env-s.pdf

2) View the FALSE ON ITS FACE March 4, 2009 Judgment and Order
of Contempt. Such judgment record is missing any authentication at
all. It was stamped on its face "FILED" with the date of March 4, 2009,
but signed on its last page by Judge Yaffe and dated March 24, 2009.
Such judgment was never entered as required by California Code to
make it "effectual for any purpose":

http://inproperinla.com/00-00-00-la-sup-ct-marina-v-county-09-03-04-
false-fine-judment-record-copy-from-us-dist-ct-habeas-corpus-doc-
16-response-by-la-sup-ct-filed-may-1-2009.pdf

MISSING DOCUMENTS

The case of Richard Fine documented a pattern of publication of false

records in online public access systems, and denial of access to or
missing true judicial records:
1) The Los Angeles Superior Court – in Marina v LA
County (BS109420) published a false online "Case Summary", but
denied access to the Register of Actions (California civil docket) in
the case management system of the court.
2) The Sheriff of Los Angeles County – in re:Richard I Fine, (Inmate
#1824367) published false online arrest and booking records in its
"Inmate Information Center", but denied access to the true Los
Angeles County Booking Record of Inmate Richard Fine.
3) The US District Court, Los Angeles – in Fine v Baca (2:09-cv-
01914) published a false online "PACER docket", which the Clerk of
the Court refuses to certify, but denied access to the NEFs (Notices
of Electronic Filing - the authentication records) in the case, and to
the paper record, which was Richard Fine's commencing record - the
petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which was allegedly adulterated
at the US District Court.
4) The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit – in Fine v Sheriff (09-
71692) and Fine v Sheriff (09-56073) published false online "PACER
dockets", but denied access to the NDAs (Notices of Docket Activity -
the authentication records), and also to critical records filed by
respondents in the appeal.
5) The US Supreme Court – in Fine v Baca (09-A827) published a
false online "docket" noting denials on both March 12, 2010 and April
23/26, 2010, which were not supported by the Court records in the
case. Any evidence of valid judicial review of the Application was
missing from the Court file.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/35193676/

http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34940014/

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34834530/

http://www.scribd.com/doc/35014599/

http://www.scribd.com/doc/35149271/

COMPLAINTS
Below are links to two complaints filed with the office of US Attorney,
Central District of California - for public corruption and deprivation of
rights in the case of Richard Fine:

1) View complaint filed with US Attorney Office, alleging public

corruption and deprivation of rights by the California Judicial Council
and California Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald George, relative
to their conduct in the habeas corpus at the US District Court:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/33879469/

2) View the Complaint filed July 8, 2010 against Judge David Yaffe
and Sheriff Lee Baca - for Public Corruption and Deprivation of
Rights in re: Imprisonment of Richard Fine:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34057033/

3) View the Complaint filed July 1, 2010, against Counsel Danny

Bickell, of the US Supreme Court, alleging public corruption and
deprivation of rights relative to his conduct in the Application Fine v
Baca (09-A827).

http://www.scribd.com/doc/33772313/

PETITION

WE ASK SHERIFF LEE BACA TO USE HIS DUE AUTHORITY AND

PROPERLY ADDRESS THE LEGAL, CIVIL, AND HUMAN RIGHTS OF
AN AMERICAN, INMATE RICHARD FINE (CJ INMATE 1824367). WE
PRAY SHERIFF LEE BACA REVIEW THE ARREST AND BOOKING
RECORDS, AND IF FOUND NOT CONFORMING WITH THE
FUNDAMENTALS OF THE LAW - INITIATE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS
AND IMMEDIATELY RELEASE ATTORNEY RICHARD FINE. WITH IT,
THE SHERIFF MAY MARK A NEW BEGINNING FOR THE LOS
ANGELES COUNTY JUSTICE SYSTEM, WITH DIGNITY OF THE
LEGAL, CIVIL, AND HUMAN RIGHTS OF ALL...

Executive Summary:

Instant petition is filed with Los Angeles County Sheriff LEE BACA, to
use his due authority and properly address the legal, civil and human
rights of an American, inmate RICHARD FINE (#1824367).

Reconstructed Chronology:

- Prior to the March 4, 2009 proceeding, a request was forwarded by the

court of Judge David Yaffe to the Sheriff Department to have the Warrant
Detail present in the proceeding, with the understanding that the
proceeding would end with the sentencing and jailing of Attorney Richard
Fine for contempt.

- On March 4, 2009 Judge David Yaffe indeed pronounced such sentence

in open court, as evidenced in the Court Reporter's transcript. Through
such oral directives, Judge Yaffe misled the Sheriff's Warrant Detail to
arrest Attorney Richard Fine at 11:05 am - albeit - with no written, valid,
and effectual warrant at all.

- On March 4, 2009, at 11:05 am, the Sheriff's Warrant Detail arrested

Richard Fine in open court, at the Superior Court of California, County of
Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles, albeit - with no warrant at all.

- On March 4, 2009 Judge Yaffe then left the courtroom, and likewise - left
the Warrant Detail with no record as an adequate legal foundation for the
arrest. Instead, Judge Yaffe proceeded to create a second, contradictory
record in the court file. The court file to this date does not reflect any
sentencing or jailing at all. In fact, the March 4, 2009 proceeding was
entirely omitted from the record!
- On March 4, 2009, at 12:32 pm, the Sheriff's Warrant Detail, having no
record as foundation for the arrest and jailing, recorded the arrest and
booking of Richard Fine as if they had taken place on location, and
pursuant to the authority of the non-existent "San Pedro Municipal Court."
Such records were a false and deliberately misleading records, and out of
compliance with the law. They had no valid court order or judgment as its
foundation. No such court had existed for almost a decade! The false
and deliberately misleading booking record is the main subject of instant
petition.

- On March 4, 2009, at 4:31 pm, papers were received by the Sheriff's

Department through an anonymous fax transmission, unauthenticated, and
with no cover sheet, from "Judicial Services". Such papers reflected yet a
third, again false and deliberately misleading set of retroactive records for
the arrest and booking of Richard Fine. Such records included invalid
records: (a) The March 4, 2009 Remand Order and (b) the March 4, 2009
Judgment for contempt.

On such background it was understandable why Sheriff Lee Baca refused

to respond to Attorney Richard Fine's habeas corpus petition, and likewise
- why Sheriff Lee Baca has refused to allow access to the California public
records, which are the arrest and booking record of Richard Fine.

Pleading: We pray Sheriff Lee Baca review the arrest and booking
records, and if such records are found failing to conform with the
fundamentals of the law - take corrective actions and immediately release
Attorney Richard Fine. With it, the Sheriff may mark a new beginning for
the Los Angeles County justice system, with dignity of the legal, civil, and
human rights of all.

Joseph Zernik, PhD

Jz12345@earthlink.net

Human Rights Alert (NGO)

Human Rights Alert is dedicated to discovering, archiving, and
disseminating evidence of Human Rights violations by the justice systems
of the State of California and the United States in Los Angeles County,
California, and beyond. Special emphasis is given to the unique role of
computerized case management systems in the precipitous deterioration
of integrity of the justice system in the United States.

less
Frank, You signed on May 25, 2010.
Your signature has been delivered to:
Sheriff Lee Baca, Los Angeles County, California

About

What have the experts said over the past decade?

* "Innocent people remain in prison"
* "...the LA Superior Court and the DA office, the two other parts of the
justice system that the Blue Panel Report
recommends must be investigated relative to the integrity of the
system, have not produced any response that we know of...”
LAPD Blue Ribbon Review Panel Report (2006)
* “…judges tried and sentenced a staggering number of people for
crimes they did not commit."
Prof David Burcham, Dean, Loyola Law School, LA (2000)
* “This is conduct associated with the most repressive dictators and
police states… and judges must share responsibility when innocent
people are convicted.”
Prof Erwin Chemerinksy, Dean, Irvine Law School (2000)

Please see additional information and sign the petition:

FREE RICHARD FINE
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free...
Positions

1. Richard Fine is held under false records - he must be

immediately released
2. Official reports show that thousands were falsely imprisoned as
part of the Rampart scandal (1998-2000) - they must be
immediately released.
3. Review of the computerized records of the Sheriff's Department
documented routine ongoing false imprisonments - they must be
stopped.
4. US and/or international investigation must be instituted of the
widespread public corruption in Los Angeles County, California.
How large is the cause?

Bastards Law
www.bastardslaw.co
m
Heil SOS
www.heilsos.com