2242
J.
CHEM. SOC., CHEM. COMMUN.,
1995
aqueous medium.10.12 The interaction of water with thesemicelles bears some semblance to that of either octanol-waterpartitioning
or
of
SDS
micelles in the presence of butanol.9Using deoxycholic acid and an (3-glycosylated f0d3of thisbile acid we have measured the capillary electrophoreticmigration
of 35
analytes, made up
of
18
simple organicmolecules and
17
drug substances. The
k’
values werecalculated from migration times by eqn.
(1),6
where
tr, to
and
(1)
tr
-
oto
(1
-
r/trnc>
I%=
t,,
are the migration times of the analyte, the electroosmoticfront and the micelle, respectively. The value of
to
wasmeasured from the migration time of methanol which
is
excluded from the micelle whereas
tmc
was measured from themigration time of the antimalarial drug, halofantrine whichcompletely associates with micelles.
14
As
a matter
of
interestwe calculated (Pomona Software) the log
P
value for halofan-trine. The high value of
8.3
obtained again justified its use as amarker for
t,,.
Capacity factors determined for the
18
standard compoundsunder different conditions are presented in Table
1.
Fordeoxycholic acid micelles
k’
values are similar at pH’s
8
and
9,
despite the fact that some of the analytes are weak acids withexpected pKa values around
9.
Moreover under both conditionsthe order
of
migration of these analytes is the same and overall,
1
0
‘a
m
-
-1
-2
,&
‘-0
0
1
2 3
4
Fig.1
Correlation of octanol-water log
P
with log
k’
for 32 analytes
(0,
standard compounds and
0,
rug substances). MECC conditions as in Fig.2, except that separation buffer was carried out at pH
8.
Log
P
k’
increases with the corresponding octanol-water partitioncoefficient. It is noteworthy that, unlike the case
of SDS
micelles,7*8 nitro- and keto- derivatives migrate before theunsubstituted solutes, indicating that partitioning across de-oxycholate micelles occurs predominantly by hydrophobic
0.020
r
(a)
-
.016
E
1
g0.012
,
3,4
a,
tl
d
D
>
3
0.004
0.000
I
4.0
5.5
7.0
8.5
10.0
11.5 13.0
14.5 16.017.5
19.0
0.030
c
(b
0.0250.020
cu
v
i7
2
14
-
4.05.57.0
8.5
10.0 11.5 13.0
14.5
tlmin
Fig.
2
Electropherograms of a number drug substances analysed usingmicelles made up of
(a)
DC and
(h)
GDC:
(1) acetaminophen, (2)mephenytoin, (3) lidocaine, (4) cromakalim
(5)
olbutamide, (6) warfarin,(7) dexamethasone, (8) ropinirole, (9) testosterone, (10) nabumetone,
(1
1)
prazepam, (12) fluoxetine, (13) progesterone, (14) halofantrine, (1
5)
sumatriptan, (16) fenoldopam and (17) propranolol. Buffer consisted of 50mmol dm-3 boric acid adjusted
to
pH 9 with potassium hydroxide andcontaining 40 mmol dm-3 bile salt; capillary, 50 mm i.d.
X
57 cm (50 cmto detector); voltage, 22
kV;
etection, 214 nm; 25 “C. Samples
(
10-3-10-5mol dm-’), dissolved in aqueous methanol or a 4% aqueous solution of bilesalt, were applied by pressure injection for
1
s.
Table
2
Comparison of measured or calculated log
P
values with estimates obtained with deoxycholate micellesBiological MECC at pH 8.0 MECC at pH 9.0 Octanol-Water
Drug
indication log
P
log
P
log
P
acetaminophen analgesic 1.6 1.7 0.510mephenytoin anticonvulsant 1.9 1.9 1.74sumatriptan antimigraine 2.4 2.3 0.93warfarin anticoagulant 2.4 2.4 2.52dexamethazone antiinflammatory 2.6 2.6 2.58ropinirole antiparkinsonian 2.6 2.8 2.5
1
nabumetoneantiinflammatory
3.5
3.4 3.08tolbutamide antidiabetic 2.4 2.4 2.34testosterone androgen 3.3 3.3 3.32lidocaine anesthetic 2.1 2.1 2.26fluoxetine antidepressant 3.7 3.6 4.05progesterone progestogen 3.8 3.8 3.87cromakalim antihypertensive 2.1 2.1 2.32fenoldapam renal blood flowenhancer 2.5 2.2 2.39propranolol antihypertensive 3.4 3.3 3.56prazepam antidepressant 3.5 3.5 3.73
D o w n l o a d e d b y U n i v e r s i t y o f M i s s o u r i - C o l u m b i a o n 1 9 S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 0 P u b l i s h e d o n 0 1 J a n u a r y 1 9 9 5 o n h t t p : / / p u b s . r s c . o r g | d o i : 1 0 . 1 0 3 9 / C 3 9 9 5 0 0 0 2 2 4 1
View Online