/  649
 
Explanation of the Biblical Gospel of JohnRevealed by the Lord Jesus to His prophet Jakob Lorber from 1840 – 1865 by the “inner word” dictation
Chapter 1Spiritual interpretation of the introductory wordsof the biblical gospel of John. [John 1, 1-5]1. In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God,and the Word was God.
1. This verse has already been the subject of a great manymisrepresentations and interpretations;yes, even atheists have made use of this very text to dispute My Deityall the more surely since theyin general denied the existence of the Deity. However, we are notgoing to once again present suchfalse concepts whereby the confusion would only be increased, butshall bring light into the matterwith the shortest possible explanation. This as itself light within theprimordial light willautomatically fight and conquer all misconceptions.2. A main reason why such texts are not understood is unfortunatelythe very poor and incorrecttranslation of the Scriptures from the original tongue into the tonguesof the present time; but this isfor the best. For if the inner meaning of such texts were not hidden aswell as it is, that which isholiest therein would long since have been utterly desecrated whichwould be disastrous for theentire earth. As things are, however, only the outer shell has beenmarred while the hallowed lifehas been preserved.3. The time has come to show the true inner meaning of such texts toall who are worthy of participating in this knowledge, abut the unworthy will have to paydearly, for in these things I willnot be trifled with and I shall never take part in a trade.4. Now the explanation shall follow this necessary prelude, but I willstill add that here only theinner meaning pertaining to soul and spirit is to be understood and notthe innermost, purestheavenly meaning. This is too holy and can be bestowed only on thosein the world without harmwho seek it through living their life in accordance with the precepts of the Gospel. But the innermeaning pertaining to the soul and spirit may easily be found,sometimes already b y means of the
1
 
correct translation in the respective vernacular of the time, which shallbecome evident in theexplanation of the first verse.5. The expression ‘In the beginning’ is most incorrect and greatlyobscures the inner meaning, forthereby even the eternal existence of the Deity could be questionedand disputed, which was alsodone by some of the older philosophers from whose school thepresent-day atheists have actuallygone forth. But if we now render this text correctly, its cover will befound to be only very thin andit will not be difficult to discover the inner meaning quite clearly andsometimes very accuratelythrough such a thin cover.6. The correct translation shall read thus, In the primordial essence, oralso in the primal cause (of all life) was light (the great holy creative thought, the existential idea). This light was not only in,but also with God, that is, The light came forth from God assubstantially visible and was thus notonly in, but also with God and, as it were, flowed around the primordialdivine essence. Therebythe basis for the eventual incarnation of God was given, whichbecomes plainly evident in thefollowing text.7. Who or what actually was this light, this great thought, this mostholly fundamental idea of allfuture substantial, utterly free existence? - It could not possibly beanything else but God Himself,since God, through God and from God nothing but God Himself couldmanifest in His eternally,most perfect being - and thus this text may also be read as follows,8. In God was the light; the light flowed through and around God, andGod Himself was the light.
2. The same was in the beginning with God.
9. Now that the first verse has been made sufficiently clear and can becomprehended by anyonewith some measure of enlightenment, the second verse is self-explanatory and only bears witness tothe fact that the above described word or light or the great creativethought did not come later intoexistence out of the primordial being of God, but is as eternal as God,itself God, and therefore doesnot contain within itself any process of coming into existence. That iswhy the explanation - by way
2
 
of giving witness - follows, The same was in the beginning, or in theprimal Cause of all existence,and in all later existence - as the First Cause itself with, in and out of God, thus itself God throughand through.
3. All things were made by Him, and without Him was not anything made that was made.
10. This verse confirms and substantiates, as it were, what had alreadyin the first verse plainlypresented itself as the ‘word’ or ‘light’ in the primordial essence of allbeing or coming intoexistence, completely present, but not yet fully manifest.11. Accordingly, this third verse in its correct rendition should read asfollows,All existence came into being from this primal existence which in itself is the eternal First Cause of its existence through and through. The light, word and will of hitsexistence set its very own light,its eternal idea of creation, out of itself into a tangible, visibleexistence, and there is nothing in theentire eternal infinity that did not go forth from the same First Cause inthe same way assuming amanifest and visible existence.12. Whoever has now fully comprehended these three plainlyexplained verses must find themeaning of verse 4 quite clear.
4. In Him was life; and the life was the light of men.
13. It is obvious that the First Cause of all existence, the light of lights,the original thought of allthoughts and ideas, the archetype as the eternal original form of allforms, firstly, could not beformless and, secondly, could not be dead, since death signifies thevery opposite to all existence inwhatever form. Thus there was a most perfect life in this word or lightor in this great thoughtwithin God, fundamentally God Himself. So God was from eternity themost perfect fundamentallife in and out of Himself through and through, and this light or lifecalled forth out of itself allcreated beings, and this light or life was the light and also the lifewithin the creatures, within thehuman beings that had gone forth from Him. Thus these creatures andhuman beings were acomplete image of the primordial light which gave them theirexistence, light, and a life verysimilar to the eternal primordial existence.
3

Share & Embed

More from this user

Recent Readcasters

Add a Comment

Characters: ...

adboxleft a comment

I would like to say , simply, that the works of this series that I have had read have been full of the strongest ideas I have encountered to this day. It's worth is on par and at many times exceeds the golden nourishment of the bible, and concerning language and delivery of it's contents, I am happy to say I am constantly reminded of reading dialogue within Tolkien's many works. -Hudson Atwell , Central - South East Alabama