Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
1Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Business Activity Tax (BAT) - Taxing Out-of-State Businesses Legislation for Business and Manufacturers

Business Activity Tax (BAT) - Taxing Out-of-State Businesses Legislation for Business and Manufacturers

Ratings: (0)|Views: 16|Likes:
Last update 4/27/11. To ensure you have the latest ManuFACT, visit http://nam.org/manufacts

Connect with the Manufacturers:
http://facebook.com/NAMpage
http://twitter.com/ShopfloorNAM
http://youtube.com/namvideo
http://flickr.com/photos/namimages
http://shopfloor.org
Last update 4/27/11. To ensure you have the latest ManuFACT, visit http://nam.org/manufacts

Connect with the Manufacturers:
http://facebook.com/NAMpage
http://twitter.com/ShopfloorNAM
http://youtube.com/namvideo
http://flickr.com/photos/namimages
http://shopfloor.org

More info:

Published by: National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) on Sep 23, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

05/31/2011

pdf

text

original

 
ManuFACTS:Taxing Out-of-State Businesses
Manufacturers Need Legislation to PreventArbitrary Taxation by State Governments
Some states currently assess Business Activity Taxes (BAT), e.g. income, franchise,or gross receipts taxes, on out-of-state manufacturers and other businessesthat do not have any employees or property in the state. This arbitrary taxationof out-of-state businesses interferes with interstate commerce. Lawmakerslast addressed this issue in 1959, when they clarified that a state cannot imposeincome taxes on an out-of-state company if the company’s only contactwith the state is to solicit orders for sales of tangible goods.Business models have changed significantly in the past 50 years, particularly with the advent of new technologies. At the same time, more and more stateshave taken a more aggressive stance in taxing out-of-state companies.Court decisions in recent years have added to the uncertainty. Several statecourts have upheld the use of an “economic presence” test to determinewhether a state can tax an out-of-state business. The U.S. Supreme Court in2009 declined to hear appeals of two lower court decisions relying on“economic presence” rather than physical presence.Congress needs to act now to clarify when a state can tax a business with littleor no physical presence in the state. Legislation also is needed to extend thecurrent legal “safe harbor” for soliciting sales of tangible goods to sales ofintangible goods and services.As other countries reduce their tax rates to compete in the global market,arbitrary state taxation can increase the domestic effective tax rates forU.S.-based companies, making it harder for these companies to competeglobally.
How Congress Can Help
The NAM urges representatives to cosponsor and act quickly on bipartisan BAT simplification legislation H.R. 1439(Goodlatte, R-VA/Scott, D-VA).
1331 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20004
P
202
637
3000
 
F
202
637
3182www.nam.org

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->