i
TABLE OF CONTENTSPage
I. NATURE AND SUMMARY OF THE ACTION..............................................................1II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE.........................................................................................9III. THE PARTIES..................................................................................................................10A. P
LAINTIFF
..............................................................................................................10B. D
EFENDANTS
.........................................................................................................111. Citigroup Defendants................................................................................112. Individual Defendants...............................................................................12IV. SECURITIES PURCHASED BY PLAINTIFF...............................................................18V. BACKGROUND ALLEGATIONS PERTINENT TO ALL COUNTS...........................28A. S
UBPRIME
M
ORTGAGES
B
ECOME
A
TTRACTIVE
T
O
L
ENDERS
................................28B. T
HE
P
ROLIFERATION
O
F
F
INANCIAL
I
NSTRUMENTS
B
ACKED
B
Y
U.S.
R
ESIDENTIAL
M
ORTGAGES
....................................................................................30C. C
ITIGROUP
’
S
I
NVOLVEMENT
I
N
M
ORTGAGE
-R
ELATED
A
CTIVITIES
.......................341. Subprime Lending Fuels Citi’s Bottom Line............................................342. Citi’s Mortgage Portfolio Included Large Volumes Of SubprimeAnd Other Risky Loans............................................................................343. Citigroup’s CDOs.....................................................................................354. Citigroup’s SIVs.......................................................................................375. Citigroup’s ARS........................................................................................39D. I
NDICATORS
T
HAT
M
ORTGAGE
M
ARKETS
W
ERE
D
ETERIORATING
B
Y
2005.........41E. I
NDICATORS
T
HAT
S
ECONDARY
M
ARKETS
F
OR
MBS
A
ND
CDO
S
W
ERE
D
ETERIORATING
B
Y
J
ANUARY
2007......................................................................44VI. DEFENDANTS MISREPRESENTED CITI’S FINANCIAL POSITION ANDRESULTS, AND FAILED TO DISCLOSE MATERIAL INFORMATIONREGARDING THE RISKS AND LOSSES TO WHICH CITI WAS EXPOSED..........47
Case 1:10-cv-07202-UA Document 1 Filed 09/17/10 Page 2 of 221