Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword
Like this
14Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Answer and Counterclaim

Answer and Counterclaim

Ratings: (0)|Views: 1,117|Likes:
Published by PaidContent

More info:

Published by: PaidContent on Sep 28, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

08/12/2013

pdf

text

original

 
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627281
   W   i  n  s   t  o  n   &   S   t  r  a  w  n   L   L   P
   1   0   1   C  a   l   i   f  o  r  n   i  a   S   t  r  e  e   t   S  a  n   F  r  a  n  c   i  s  c  o ,   C   A   9   4   1   1   1  -   5   8   0   2
 ANDREW P. BRIDGES (
 pro hac vice
pending)abridges@winston.com J. CALEB DONALDSON (
 pro hac vice
pending)Jcdonaldson@winston.com KATHLEEN LU (
 pro hac vice
pending)klu@winston.com WINSTON & STRAWN LLP101 California Street, 39
th
Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5802Telephone: (415) 591-1000Facsimile: (415) 591-1400KURT OPSAHL (
 pro hac vice
)kurt@eff.org CORYNNE MCSHERRY (
 pro hac vice
)corynne@eff.org ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION454 Shotwell StreetSan Francisco, CA 94110Telephone: (415) 436-9333Facsimile: (415) 436-9993CHAD BOWERS (NV State Bar No. 7283) bowers@lawyer.com CHAD A. BOWERS, LTD NV State Bar No. 72833202 West Charleston BoulevardLas Vegas, Nevada 89102Telephone: (702) 457-1001Attorneys for Defendant and CounterclaimantDEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC,and Defendant DAVID ALLEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTDISTRICT OF NEVADA
RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limited-liabilitycompany,Plaintiff,v.DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC, aDistrict of Columbia limited-liability company;and DAVID ALLEN, an individualDefendants.)))))))))))))
Case No. 2:10-cv-01356-RLH-RJJANSWER OF DEFENDANTSDEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLCAND DAVID ALLEN ANDCOUNTERCLAIM OFCOUNTERCLAIMANT DEMOCRATICUNDERGROUND, LLCJURY DEMANDCAPTION CONTINUES ON NEXT PAGE
))))))
 
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282
   W   i  n  s   t  o  n   &   S   t  r  a  w  n   L   L   P
   1   0   1   C  a   l   i   f  o  r  n   i  a   S   t  r  e  e   t   S  a  n   F  r  a  n  c   i  s  c  o ,   C   A   9   4   1   1   1  -   5   8   0   2
 DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND, LLC, aDistrict of Columbia limited-liability company,Counterclaimant,v.RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limited-liabilitycompany, andSTEPHENS MEDIA LLC, a Nevada limited-liability companyCounterdefendants.)))))))))))))))Democratic Underground, LLC (“Democratic Underground”) and David Allen (referred totogether below as “Defendants”) respond to the Plaintiff’s Complaint as follows:1.
 
Defendants admit that this is an action for copyright infringement but deny that anyinfringement underlies this action.2.
 
Defendants lack enough information to admit or deny the allegations of paragraph 2of the Complaint and therefore deny the allegations.3.
 
Defendants lack enough information to admit or deny the allegations of paragraph 3of the Complaint and therefore deny the allegations.4.
 
Defendants admit that Democratic Underground is a District of Columbia limited-liability company. Defendants lack enough knowledge to admit or deny the remaining allegations of  paragraph 4 of the Complaint and therefore deny the allegations.5.
 
Defendants admit that Democratic Underground is identified by the current registrar,Dotster, Inc. (“Dotster”), as the registrant for the Internet domain found atdemocraticunderground.com (the “Democratic Underground Domain”). Defendants lack enoughknowledge to admit or deny the remaining allegations of paragraph 5 of the Complaint and thereforedeny the allegations.6.
 
Defendants deny that Democratic Underground is identified by Dotster as anadministrative contact and technical contact for the Democratic Underground Domain. Defendantslack enough knowledge to admit or deny the remaining allegations of paragraph 6 of the Complaintand therefore deny the allegations.
 
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627283
   W   i  n  s   t  o  n   &   S   t  r  a  w  n   L   L   P
   1   0   1   C  a   l   i   f  o  r  n   i  a   S   t  r  e  e   t   S  a  n   F  r  a  n  c   i  s  c  o ,   C   A   9   4   1   1   1  -   5   8   0   2
 7.
 
Defendants admit that Mr. Allen is identified by Dotster as an administrative contactand technical contact for the Democratic Underground Domain. Defendants lack enough knowledgeto admit or deny the remaining allegations of paragraph 7 of the Complaint and therefore deny theallegations.8.
 
Defendants admit that Mr. Allen is the owner of Democratic Underground, and thatMr. Allen is identified as such on the Democratic Underground Domain. Defendants lack enoughknowledge to admit or deny the remaining allegations of paragraph 8 of the Complaint and thereforedeny the allegations.9.
 
Defendants admit that this Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§§ 1331 and 1338(a). Defendants deny the remaining allegations of paragraph 9 of the Complaint.10.
 
Defendants lack enough information to admit or deny the allegations of paragraph 10of the Complaint and therefore deny the allegations.11.
 
Defendants admit that the Work in Exhibit 2 states “Copyright © Las Vegas Review-Journal.” Defendants lack enough information to admit or deny the remaining allegations of  paragraph 11 of the Complaint and therefore deny the allegations.12.
 
Defendants deny the allegations of paragraph 12 of the Complaint.13.
 
Defendants deny the allegations of paragraph 13 of the Complaint.14.
 
Defendants deny the allegations of paragraph 14 of the Complaint.15.
 
Defendants admit that the subject matter of the Work includes the candidacy of Sharron Angle for the Republican nomination for United State Senator for Nevada, support for Ms.Angle by members of a conservative movement called the “Tea Party,” and the effect of suchsupport on the viability of Ms. Angle’s candidacy as reflected in polling data. Defendants deny theremaining allegations of paragraph 15 of the Complaint.16.
 
Defendants deny the allegations of paragraph 16 of the Complaint.17.
 
Defendants admit that the Work was and is of specific interest to Nevada residents.Defendants deny the remaining allegations of paragraph 17 of the Complaint.18.
 
Defendants deny the allegations of paragraph 18 of the Complaint.19.
 
Defendants deny the allegations of paragraph 19 of the Complaint.

Activity (14)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
Toad28 liked this
packagingwiz liked this
packagingwiz liked this
leolamboy6954 liked this
packagingwiz liked this
packagingwiz liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
scribd
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->