Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Save to My Library
Look up keyword or section
Like this
14Activity
0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Illegally Green Environmental Costs of Hemp Prohibition

Illegally Green Environmental Costs of Hemp Prohibition

Ratings:

5.0

(3)
|Views: 4,146|Likes:
Published by kitsilencer
A paper on the pros and cons of hemp based manufacturing as opposed to cotton, wood, etc.
A paper on the pros and cons of hemp based manufacturing as opposed to cotton, wood, etc.

More info:

Published by: kitsilencer on Jul 07, 2008
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

12/04/2012

pdf

text

original

 
By Skaidra Smith-Heisters
 
March
2008
I
llegally
g
reen
: e
nvIronmental
C
osts
 
of
H
emp
p
roHIbItIon
 
POLICYSTUDY
367
 
 
Reason Foundation
Reason Foundation’s mission is to advance a free society by developing,applying, and promoting libertarian principles, including individual liberty,free markets, and the rule of law. We use journalism and public policy
research to inuence the frameworks and actions of policymakers, journalists,
and opinion leaders.Reason Foundation’s nonpartisan public policy research promotes choice,competition, and a dynamic market economy as the foundation for humandignity and progress. Reason produces rigorous, peer-reviewed research anddirectly engages the policy process, seeking strategies that emphasize cooper-
ation, exibility, local knowledge, and results. Through practical and innova
-
tive approaches to complex problems, Reason seeks to change the way people
think about issues, and promote policies that allow and encourage individuals
and voluntary institutions to ourish.Reason Foundation is a tax-exempt research and education organization asdened under IRS code 501(c)(3). Reason Foundation is supported by volun
-
tary contributions from individuals, foundations, and corporations. The views
are those of the author, not necessarily those of Reason Foundation or itstrustees.
Copyright © 2008 Reason Foundation. All rights reserved.
 
 
Reason Foundation
Illegally Green: Environmental Costs of Hemp Prohibition
By Skaidra Smith-Heisters
egulation of 
Cannabis sativa L.
is complicated by the fact that there are two common varietiesof the plant with very different properties: the agricultural variety, known by the commonname hemp, and the pharmacological variety, marijuana. Prior to prohibition in the United States,industrial hemp was the subject of considerable excitement and speculation. The same is truetoday, as lawmakers and stakeholders in many states are considering the potential for reintroducingindustrial hemp into the domestic economy.The environmental performance of industrial hemp products is of particular interest because, to alarge degree, environmental inefficiencies impose costs on society as a whole, not just on theproducers and consumers of a specific good. Many commodities which came to replace traditionaluses of industrial hemp in the United States in the last century and a half have created significantenvironmental externalities.Assessments of industrial hemp as compared to hydrocarbon or other traditional industrialfeedstocks show that, generally, hemp requires substantially lower energy demands formanufacturing, is often suited to less-toxic means of processing, provides competitive productperformance (especially in terms of durability, light weight, and strength), greater recyclabilityand/or biodegradability, and a number of value-added applications for byproducts and wastematerials at either end of the product life cycle. Unlike petrochemical feedstocks, industrial hempproduction offsets carbon dioxide emissions, helping to close the carbon cycle.The positive aspects of industrial hemp as a crop are considered in the context of countervailingattributes. Performance areas where industrial hemp may have higher average environmental coststhan comparable raw materials result from the use of water and fertilizer during the growth stage,greater frequency of soil disturbance (erosion) during cultivation compared to forests and somefield crops, and relatively high water use during the manufacturing stage of hemp products.
R

Activity (14)

You've already reviewed this. Edit your review.
1 hundred reads
1 thousand reads
sprig_jack3706 liked this
sprig_jack3706 liked this
pcortes787 liked this
cornishs3438 liked this
lagul liked this
PataXv34 liked this
luferdita liked this
maxzar100 liked this

You're Reading a Free Preview

Download
/*********** DO NOT ALTER ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE ! ************/ var s_code=s.t();if(s_code)document.write(s_code)//-->