Welcome to Scribd, the world's digital library. Read, publish, and share books and documents. See more
Download
Standard view
Full view
of .
Look up keyword or section
Like this
1Activity

Table Of Contents

0 of .
Results for:
No results containing your search query
P. 1
Suicide Note by Mitchell Heisman

Suicide Note by Mitchell Heisman

Ratings: (0)|Views: 13|Likes:
Published by vizualizer
Mr. Mitchell Heisman's Suicide Note.

Exordia:
Freedom of Speech on Trial
How the Very Act of Repressing this Work Can Verify Its Freedom of Speech Hypothesis
An Experiment in Nihilism
What the hell happened to reason?
Part I:
God is Technology
How the Singularity of Monotheism Transcended Biology and Primed the Technological Genesis of God
The Seditious Genius of the Spiritual Penis of Jesus
How Christianity’s Subversion of Kin Selective Altruism Evolved into the Modern Idea of Social Progress
Absolute Purity
The Secularization of Hell within the Desecration Machine of Auschwitz
Part II:
A Vendetta Called Revolution
How Ethnic Hostility between Anglo-Saxons and the Normans Who Conquered Them Evolved into Liberal Democracy
Converse Cognates
Why the Norman Conquest was the World-Historical Ass-Kicking that Deflected the English-speaking World from the German Path to Nazism
Creating God and the Evolution of Genetic Suicide
Why Liberal Democracy Leads to the Rational Biological Self-Destruction of Humans and the Rational Technological Creation of God
Terminus:
The Punchline
Background Research for an Experimental Elimination of Self-Preservation and other Biasing Biological Factors
Selected Bibliography
(What suicide note would be complete without a bibliography?)
Ordinary people seem not to realize that those who really apply themselves in the right way to philosophy are directly and of their own accord preparing themselves for dying and death. If this is true, and they have actually been looking forward to death all their lives, it would of course be absurd to be troubled when the thing comes for which they have so long been preparing and looking forward.
—SOCRATES, PHAEDO

Freedom of Speech on Trial
If my hypothesis is correct, this work will be repressed. It should not be surprising if justice is not done to the evidence presented here. It should not be unexpected that these arguments will not be given a fair hearing. It is not unreasonable to think that this work will not be judged on its merits.

This work contains a theoretical application of sociobiology to politics. Simply discussing its theories publicly can constitute an experimental test of liberal democracy’s original enlightenment claim to advance freedom of rational inquiry. Such a discussion can clarify the extent, and the particular ways, in which these original enlightenment self-justifications have been politically abandoned. The attempt to repress rather than address the evidence in this work, for example, can clarify that there are arguments of substance that are being denied a right to be heard. Persistent intolerance of certain kinds of rational inquiry can clarify that civilized means of public discourse have broken down.

The basic problem with a sociobiological self-analysis for liberal democracy is that it does what its free speech principles were designed to do. Sociobiology can help expose the distortions, lies, and falsehoods of the powers that be — that power being liberal democracy itself. Findings of sociobiology have refuted the original theory of human nature underlying liberal democracy. The constitutional right to freedom of speech was built upon this pre-Darwinian view of man that findings of sociobiology have refuted.

In consequence, an accurate sociobiological theory of liberal democracy presents the fundamental test of this political system’s claims to freedom speech. The system cannot be understood on the basis on its own premises and assumptions. This sociobiological theory about liberal democracy requires going beyond liberal democracy and this is what makes sociobiological self-understanding inherently controversial and liable to be repressed within a liberal democracy.

Those who think that sociobiology fully applied to the human-political sphere should expect a fair hearing on the grounds of freedom of speech have committed an error. The error falls, not on liberal democracy itself, but on those who have overestimated it as a politi
Mr. Mitchell Heisman's Suicide Note.

Exordia:
Freedom of Speech on Trial
How the Very Act of Repressing this Work Can Verify Its Freedom of Speech Hypothesis
An Experiment in Nihilism
What the hell happened to reason?
Part I:
God is Technology
How the Singularity of Monotheism Transcended Biology and Primed the Technological Genesis of God
The Seditious Genius of the Spiritual Penis of Jesus
How Christianity’s Subversion of Kin Selective Altruism Evolved into the Modern Idea of Social Progress
Absolute Purity
The Secularization of Hell within the Desecration Machine of Auschwitz
Part II:
A Vendetta Called Revolution
How Ethnic Hostility between Anglo-Saxons and the Normans Who Conquered Them Evolved into Liberal Democracy
Converse Cognates
Why the Norman Conquest was the World-Historical Ass-Kicking that Deflected the English-speaking World from the German Path to Nazism
Creating God and the Evolution of Genetic Suicide
Why Liberal Democracy Leads to the Rational Biological Self-Destruction of Humans and the Rational Technological Creation of God
Terminus:
The Punchline
Background Research for an Experimental Elimination of Self-Preservation and other Biasing Biological Factors
Selected Bibliography
(What suicide note would be complete without a bibliography?)
Ordinary people seem not to realize that those who really apply themselves in the right way to philosophy are directly and of their own accord preparing themselves for dying and death. If this is true, and they have actually been looking forward to death all their lives, it would of course be absurd to be troubled when the thing comes for which they have so long been preparing and looking forward.
—SOCRATES, PHAEDO

Freedom of Speech on Trial
If my hypothesis is correct, this work will be repressed. It should not be surprising if justice is not done to the evidence presented here. It should not be unexpected that these arguments will not be given a fair hearing. It is not unreasonable to think that this work will not be judged on its merits.

This work contains a theoretical application of sociobiology to politics. Simply discussing its theories publicly can constitute an experimental test of liberal democracy’s original enlightenment claim to advance freedom of rational inquiry. Such a discussion can clarify the extent, and the particular ways, in which these original enlightenment self-justifications have been politically abandoned. The attempt to repress rather than address the evidence in this work, for example, can clarify that there are arguments of substance that are being denied a right to be heard. Persistent intolerance of certain kinds of rational inquiry can clarify that civilized means of public discourse have broken down.

The basic problem with a sociobiological self-analysis for liberal democracy is that it does what its free speech principles were designed to do. Sociobiology can help expose the distortions, lies, and falsehoods of the powers that be — that power being liberal democracy itself. Findings of sociobiology have refuted the original theory of human nature underlying liberal democracy. The constitutional right to freedom of speech was built upon this pre-Darwinian view of man that findings of sociobiology have refuted.

In consequence, an accurate sociobiological theory of liberal democracy presents the fundamental test of this political system’s claims to freedom speech. The system cannot be understood on the basis on its own premises and assumptions. This sociobiological theory about liberal democracy requires going beyond liberal democracy and this is what makes sociobiological self-understanding inherently controversial and liable to be repressed within a liberal democracy.

Those who think that sociobiology fully applied to the human-political sphere should expect a fair hearing on the grounds of freedom of speech have committed an error. The error falls, not on liberal democracy itself, but on those who have overestimated it as a politi

More info:

Published by: vizualizer on Oct 01, 2010
Copyright:Attribution Non-commercial No-derivs

Availability:

Read on Scribd mobile: iPhone, iPad and Android.
download as PDF or read online from Scribd
See more
See less

11/02/2011

pdf

 
 
suicide note
Mitchell Heisman
Ordinary people seem not to realize that thosewho really apply themselves in the right way tophilosophy are directly and of their own accordpreparing themselves for dying and death. If thisis true, and they have actually been looking forward to death all their lives, it would of coursebe absurd to be troubled when the thing comesfor which they have so long been preparing andlooking forward.
 —S
OCRATES
,
 
HAEDO 
 
This work is free and licensed by Mitchell Heisman forcopying and distribution under aCreative CommonsAttribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0United States License.
 
Overview
E
XORDIA
:
How the Very Act of Repressing this WorkCan Verify Its Freedom of Speech Hypothesis
What the hell happened to reason?
P
ART
I:
How the Singularity of MonotheismTranscended Biology and Primedthe Technological Genesis of God
How Christianity’s Subversion of Kin Selective Altruism Evolved intothe Modern Idea of Social Progress
The Secularization of Hell within theDesecration Machine of Auschwitz
 
OVERVIEW
3
P
ART
II:
How Ethnic Hostility between Anglo-Saxonsand the Normans Who Conquered ThemEvolved into Liberal Democracy
Why the Norman Conquest was theWorld-Historical Ass-Kickingthat Deflected the English-speaking Worldfrom the German Path to Nazism
Why Liberal Democracy Leads to theRational Biological Self-Destruction of Humans and theRational Technological Creation of God
T
ERMINUS
:
Background Research for an ExperimentalElimination of Self-Preservation andother Biasing Biological Factors
(What suicide note would be complete without abibliography?)