You are on page 1of 6

Q1 Does your institution provide any information or advice to students or staff on

any potential liability under Terrorism legislation which might result from accessing
materials for teaching or research ? If so please provide copies of any documents
held which detail or refer to such information or advice.

The University provides relevant information under two codes, the research
code of conduct and the computer code of practice. These two codes are
attached to the email.

Q2 Does your institution have any kind of procedure to review or assess reading
lists, module descriptors or other teaching materials which explicitly or in practice
considers questions of safety and risk under terrorism legislation as part of its remit ?
For example does the institution have anything similar or analogous to the 'module
review process' established at Nottingham University described here :
http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=407122;
http://www.teachingterrorism.net/2009/08/03/nottingham-censorship-a-defence;
http://www.teachingterrorism.net/2009/08/06/is-vetting-at-nottingham-in-defence-of-
academic-freedom
If so please supply full details of this policy and procedure and advise when and how
it was decided upon and implemented.

The University does have a procedure for reviewing course and module
content, which can be found at the following link
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/quality-manual/taught-programmes/annual-
monitoring.htm
The University’s annual monitoring process as described in the Quality
Manual is of long standing, being codified at the inception of the Quality
Manual in the late 1990s.

“The module review process” mentioned is relevant to the School of Politics


within the University, it is not applied across the University as a whole.

Q3 Does your institution have any system, policy or procedure in place for dealing
with any potential actions taken by the authorities against the institution, its students
or staff under Terrorism legislation ? If so please supply a copy of the policy and
advise the date it was decided upon and implemented.

The status of any student or staff member who was suspected of criminal
activity, arrested by the police and subsequently convicted of a crime would
be considered at a relevant stage in the light of the Code of Discipline for
Students, the Staff Handbook and the individual's contract of employment, as
appropriate. However, the University has no specific system, policy or
procedure in place for dealing with any potential actions taken by the
authorities against the institution, its students or staff under Terrorism
legislation.

Q4 Does your institution have any system, policy or procedure in place for
‘preventing violent extremism’ as recommended for example in the government
guidance document ‘Promoting Good Campus Relations’
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/tna/
+/http://www.dius.gov.uk/publications/extremismhe.pdf
Please indicate what procedures or policy exist and advise when it was decided
upon and implemented, and provide copies of any documents held which detail or
refer to such policy or procedures.

The procedure “Promoting good campus relations, fostering shared values


and preventing violent extremism in Universities and Higher Education
Colleges” was implemented following the guidance provided in “Promoting
Good Campus Relations”.

Promoting good campus relations, fostering shared values and preventing violent
extremism in Universities and Higher Education Colleges

Summary, action points and issues for consideration

The DIUS guidance focuses on 5 key objectives and themes outlined below:

1. To promote and reinforce shared values; to create space for free and open
debate; and to listen to and support mainstream voices.

Issues to consider University response


• Is there a clearly publicised, Yes, see:
easily available Code of Practice http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/registrar/go
on Freedom of Speech which vernance/freedom-of-speech.pdf
outlines the university’s policies
and procedures?

• Are you working with the Yes, scheduled meetings of senior


student’s union and societies to management with SU Societies Officer
create and publicise opportunities and officers of key societies, such as JSoc
for students to voice their opinions and Student Islamic Society.
and engage actively in debate?
SU Forum for religious and political
societies and Star System for
accreditation.

SU governance structures now extend to


JCRs in Halls of Residence.

• Are you working with the Yes, with particular reference to the
students’ union to promote promoting participation from the earliest
participation in the democratic weeks via the recent JCR reforms.
process and to facilitate
opportunities to get involved in the Volunteering via Student Volunteering
community? Service (formerly Active Communities).

• Do you have regular dialogue Yes, see above and also meetings with SU
with student groups, university President, Welfare Officer and Education
chaplains and student union Officer with senior management.
general managers?
Termly meetings of the SU-CSS (Central
Support Services) Liaison Group and the
3-Faith Liaison Group.

Increased contact with SU General


Manager, who is now member of SU-CSS
(Central Support Services) Liaison Group.

2. To break down segregation amongst different student communities including


by supporting inter-faith and inter-cultural dialogue and understanding and to
engage all students in playing a full and active role in wider engagement with
society.

Issues to consider University response


• Have you reviewed your Reviewed against DIUS guidance and
existing policies and procedures to advice around PREVENT.
take account of recent relevant
legislation and available guidance
and good practice?

• Do your policies specifically University has an Equality and


address the need to balance the Diversity Committee and two Advisory
interests of particular cultural or Groups – for Staff and Students –
religious groups with those of the which report to it. Policy development
wider campus community? Are undertaken by EDC is published on-
these policies clearly line and recent examples include a
communicated to staff, students Protocol relating to absence from an
and potential students? examination for reason of religious
observance

3. To ensure student safety and campuses that are free from bullying,
harassment and intimidation.

Issues to consider University response


• Are your staff and students In addition to wider policies in the Staff
aware of their rights and Handbook, the Policy of Dignity within
responsibilities regarding the University
discrimination, harassment, (http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/staff-
intimidation, equality and freedom handbook/section-3/dignity%20within
%20the%20university-policy.php)
of speech? outlines rights and responsibilities and is
something which is used as a means of
resolving conflict between staff, between
students and, as in this case, between the
two groups.

See above re Freedom of Speech.

These policies will be given new


prominence on the new University
website.

• Do you have a clear and easily See above and also the Code of Discipline
accessible Equal Opportunities for Students
Policy and clear procedures for (http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/registrar/ca
dealing with complaints and lendar/code-of-discipline.pdf).
incidents?
The Students’ Union also has wide-
ranging policies and codes on equal
opportunities.

The University Incident Management


team meets at least twice each year to
review protocols for handling major
incidents. Aspects of these protocols are
currently under further development.

• Are staff and students clearly Yes, via numerous guidebooks and
signposted to sources of help in the websites and posters.
university, student union and local
police?

• Do you have an institutional See the Policy of Dignity within the


standard of acceptable behaviour University above.
setting out zero tolerance to
intimidation, bullying, harassment,
discrimination, racial hatred or
incitement to racial hatred or any
forms of incitement to violence or
violence itself?

4. To provide support for students who may be at risk and appropriate sources
of advice and guidance.

Issues to consider University response


• Are your staff appropriately Identifying and Responding to Students in
trained to deal with concerns from Difficulty: A Guide for Staff
students? (http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/counselling
/leaflets/NU_Guide_for_Staff.pdf) is a
key publication within the University.

In addition, training is provided for


colleagues in key roles in Schools and
Halls of residence.

• Are staff and students clearly Yes, via numerous guidebooks and
signposted to sources of help in the websites and posters.
university, student union and local
police? See also the references to training above.

• Are the Chaplaincy services that Details of the services can be found at
are available on your campus http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/chaplains
clearly publicised and easily
accessible? Chaplaincy allocated new, more
prominent space from start of 2009-10
session

5. To ensure that staff and students are aware of their roles in preventing
violent extremism.

Issues to consider University response


• Do you have clearly set out Student Societies book rooms via the SU
policies on use of external and these are then passed on to the
speakers? University Timetable Office. Colleagues
in the team inform Security and Director
of SO&S of external speakers, which
should be booked with 10 working days
notice.

Full risk assessments are carried out for


major events, often in liaison with the
Police.

Public Affairs deal with any associated


media strategy.

• Do you have recently reviewed Guidelines for conference organisers


and clearly set out policies on the updated in 2008-09.
use of university premises by
outside bodies?

• Do you have mechanisms to Widely-published contact details of


ensure that you could act University 24-hour Security Team.
appropriately if university premises
were being used for unlawful Security has contact details of all IMT
activity or speech? members.

Key student officers and society reps have


contact details of key staff.

• Do you have clear policies on IS Codes of Conduct


acceptable use of university (http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/is/support/
facilities including meeting rooms, knowledgebase/guides/IS0030.pdf;
internet, library books etc.? http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/is/support/k
nowledgebase/guides/IS0102.pdf;

http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/is/support/k
nowledgebase/guides/IS2006.pdf)

Research Code of Conduct


(http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/ris/local/res
earch-strategy-and-
policy/code_of_conduct.pdf)

Staff Handbook
(https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/staff-
handbook/)

Student Code of Discipline (see link


above)

• Do you have in place the Translation of certain languages is easily


methods to be able to translate any acquired due to staff expertise within the
publications or literature being held institution. External support would be
or distributed on campus into identified where necessary.
English?

You might also like