Professional Documents
Culture Documents
implications
Hypothalamus
Negative feedback
Releasing
Justine K Elliott factor
George M Hall Anterior
pituitary
Posterior pituitary
Stimulatory
Abstract
hormone
The hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis is activated by surgery, trauma Negative feedback
and critical illness. Anaesthesia can suppress adrenocortical secretion
either by an effect at the hypothalamus (e.g. by a decrease in neural
input with regional anaesthesia) or by a direct effect on the adrenal
Stimulatory hormone
cortex (e.g. by etomidate). For patients undergoing routine surgery an
released into
increase in cortisol secretion is unnecessary; uneventful recovery occurs systemic circulation
in the presence of circulating cortisol concentrations within the normal
range. Patients taking corticosteroids for many medical conditions often
present for surgery. A rationale for steroid supplementation based on
physiological principles and clinical evidence is presented in this article. Target gland
The use of steroids in critically ill patients remains contentious, with
little agreement about what is an appropriate circulating cortisol concen-
tration and the interpretation of the results of the short Synacthen test. Active hormone
Negative feedback
Keywords cortisol; etomidate; sepsis; surgery
Target tissue
Reproduced from Ashton N. Pituitary, adrenal and thyroid dysfunction. Anaesthesia and
Intensive Care Medicine 2005; 6: 346−49.
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE 9:10 454 © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Pharmacology
ACTH + 17α-Hydroxlase
Cholesterol Pregnenolone 17α-Hydroxypregnenolone Dehydroepiandrosterone
Angiotensin II +
3β-
Trilostane – 3β-Dehydrogenase 3β-Dehydrogenase
Dehydrogenase
17α-Hydroxlase
Progesterone 17α-Hydroxyprogesterone Androstenedione
21β-Hydroxylase 21β-Hydroxylase
17α-Hydroxlase
11-Deoxycorticosterone 11-Deoxycortisol
Angiotensin II + 18-Hydroxylase
Aldosterone
Figure 2
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE 9:10 455 © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Pharmacology
several anaesthetic drugs have been shown to inhibit ACTH on the cardiovascular system, etomidate is often administered to
release during surgery. Large doses of μ-opioid analgesics have physiologically unstable patients undergoing elective surgery, for
been shown repeatedly to block the ACTH/cortisol response example major vascular surgery. It has been shown repeatedly
to surgery, but only at the expense of postoperative respira- that a single induction dose of etomidate inhibits cortisol and
tory depression. Similarly, large doses of midazolam have been aldosterone secretion for about 8 hours. Circulating cortisol con-
found to partially inhibit ACTH secretion, presumably as a conse- centrations are usually in the low–normal range during this time
quence of activating γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors in the (250–300 mmol/litre). Despite the absence of the typical cortisol
hypothalamus. Although this is unlikely to be relevant clinically response to surgery these patients show no increase in mortality
when midazolam is used for short-term sedation, suppression of or major morbidity. The inference, therefore, is that, for patients
cortisol will occur if it is infused for several days. The α2-agonist undergoing routine elective surgery, cortisol is necessary only in
dexmedetomidine has an interesting biphasic effect on hypo- normal concentrations at least intraoperatively and for the first
thalamic–pituitary function. It decreases ACTH secretion while hours after surgery.
stimulating GH release. In addition to the opioid receptors, α-
adrenoceptors and GABA receptors, other neurotransmitters that
Therapeutic use of steroids and anaesthesia
have been shown to be involved in controlling CRH release in
animals include acetylcholine and 5-hydroxytryptamine. Corticosteroids are used widely in medicine, and after prolonged
Etomidate achieved notoriety in the early 1980s when used administration there is failure of endogenous cortisol secretion as
for prolonged sedation in critically ill patients in intensive care a result of the negative feedback on ACTH and CRH (Figure 1).
units. Mortality was increased significantly and this was shown It is now at least half a century since the notion was introduced
to be associated with severe adrenocortical suppression. Subse- that patients taking steroids needed large doses of steroid cover
quently, etomidate was withdrawn in many countries, although to survive surgery. During this time many patients have received
it is still available for use as a single-dose induction agent in 200–300 mg hydrocortisone per 24 hours for 2–3 days to prevent
UK. The mechanism underlying the adrenal suppression has the possibility of adrenal insufficiency. This practice is illogical
been well described; inhibition of 11β-hydroxylase with a lesser and unnecessary.
effect on other β-hydroxylases and cholesterol cleavage enzyme There are two principal arguments against the administration
(Figure 2). Other commonly administered induction agents such of large doses of steroids perioperatively. First, work with etomi-
as propofol and thiopentone are approximately 1000 times less date has shown that only normal circulating values of cortisol
potent than etomidate in inhibiting 11β-hydroxylase. Etomidate and aldosterone are necessary for routine surgery. Furthermore,
is an imidazole derivative, and it is this moiety that is respon- primate studies have confirmed that the normal daily cortisol
sible for enzyme inhibition. Indeed, etomidate is such a potent output, 25 mg/day in man, is sufficient for major upper abdomi-
inhibitor of adrenal steroidogenesis that it has been used to treat nal surgery. Second, even if the anaesthetist wished to mimic the
inoperable malignant adrenocortical tumours. A low-dose infu- usual cortisol response to surgery, the total secretion in the first
sion markedly decreased cortisol secretion with only minimal 24 hours after surgery rarely exceeds 100 mg. Thus, the current
sedation. recommendations for steroid cover are based on these underly-
In spite of the profound endocrinological effects of etomidate ing physiological principles (Table 1). The key points to note are
this compound is still used for induction of anaesthesia. Because that if the patient is taking less than 10 mg prednisolone/day
of its safety profile – a 30-fold difference between the anaesthetic (or an equivalent dose of another steroid) then additional hydro-
dose and the lethal dose – and the minimal depressant effects cortisone is unnecessary; if the patient has not taken steroids in
Patients currently taking < 10 mg/day Assume normal HPA response Additional steroid cover not required
steroids (prednisolone)
> 10 mg/day Minor surgery 25 mg hydrocortisone at induction
Moderate surgery Usual preoperative steroids + 25 mg
hydrocortisone at induction + 100 mg/day
for 24 hours
Major surgery Usual preoperative steroids + 25 mg
hydrocortisone at induction + 100 mg/day
for 48–72 hours
High-dose immunosuppression Give usual immunosuppressive doses during perioperative period
Patients stopped taking < 3 months Treat as if taking steroids
steroids
> 3 months No perioperative steroids necessary
Table 1
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE 9:10 456 © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Pharmacology
the past 3 months, again hydrocortisone is not required periop- disputes about whether to use an absolute threshold value after
eratively; and if high-dose steroids are being given for immuno- ACTH, such as 550 mmol/litre cortisol, or to use an incremental
suppression then these must be maintained perioperatively. increase. The problem with the latter approach is that the size
Old regimens of 200–300 mg/day of hydrocortisone are of of the increment is inversely related to the magnitude of the
historical interest only. The excessive administration of steroids concentration of cortisol before ACTH.
perioperatively is associated with the following complications: It is not surprising that attempts to assess adrenocortical func-
hypertension from fluid retention, hyperglycaemia, immuno- tion in patients in intensive care units have proved difficult.
suppression, failure of wound healing, gastric erosions and psy- Nevertheless, there may be a group of patients who have adre-
chological disturbances. Perioperative hypotension in a patient nocortical insufficiency and in whom outcome may be improved
taking steroids is not uncommon. It has been shown that this is by the administration of hydrocortisone. Glucocorticoids have a
only rarely associated with low circulating cortisol values and is key role in maintaining the responsiveness of the vasculature to
commonly the result of hypovolaemia. If hypotension persists catecholamines so that adrenocortical insufficiency may result in
after fluid administration then 25 mg intravenous hydrocortisone the failure to respond to infusions of adrenergic drugs. Steroids
may be given. Ideally, a blood sample should be taken for corti- have been given to critically ill patients for several decades, par-
sol estimation before the hydrocortisone bolus so that suspected ticularly those with sepsis, and enthusiasm for this approach has
steroid deficiency can be confirmed or refuted. waxed and waned. Recommendations produced by the Surviving
Sepsis Campaign in 2004 stated that patients with septic shock
who, despite adequate fluid replacement, required inotropes
Steroids and the critically ill
to maintain blood pressure should be given a ‘low-dose’ daily
The ACTH/cortisol response to elective surgery has been well replacement with 200–300 mg hydrocortisone. However, these
defined and the rationale for hydrocortisone supplementation in recommendations may be revised as a recent large randomized
surgical patients taking glucocorticoids is now well established. control trial found no effect on mortality in patients with sepsis
In critically ill patients in the intensive care unit the appropri- given hydrocortisone 200 mg/24 hours and an increase in infec-
ateness of the observed cortisol changes is unclear. Plasma cor- tions and hypertension in the steroid-treated patients. It is likely
tisol values tend to be increased in the early stages of critical that there will continue to be confusion about the role of hydro-
illness and correlate with the severity of other physiological cortisone in critically ill patients until the pathophysiological
scoring systems and hence predict outcome. However, there is changes in hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal function have been
much confusion about the magnitude of the cortisol response elucidated. ◆
necessary to maintain normal cardiovascular function in such
patients. Attempts have been made to assess adrenocortical
function by using 250 μg of synthetic ACTH intravenously to
stimulate cortisol production. Blood samples are collected before Further reading
and 30 and 60 minutes after ACTH administration for cortisol Dellinger RP, Carelet JM, Masur H, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign
determination (short Synacthen test; Alliance Pharmaceuticals guidelines for management of severe sepsis and shock. Crit Care
Ltd, Chippenham, UK). This test was devised originally to assess Med 2004; 32: 858–73.
adrenocortical responsiveness in endocrinological patients who Desborough JP. The stress response to trauma and surgery. Br J
were taking, or had taken, glucocorticoids. Even in this rela- Anaesth 2000; 85: 109–17.
tively straightforward clinical area interpretation of the results Nicholson G, Burrin JM, Hall GM. Peri-operative steroid
of the short Synacthen test has been difficult. There have been supplementation. Anaesthesia 1998; 53: 1091–104.
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE 9:10 457 © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.