Read without ads and support Scribd by becoming a Scribd Premium Reader.
 
The Messenger
No. 141 – September 2010
   O  n   t   h  e   d   i   f   f  e  r  e  n  c  e   b  e   t  w  e  e  n  s  e  e   i  n  g  a  n   d   i  m  a  g  e  q  u  a   l   i   t  y   M  e  a  s  u  r   i  n  g  w  a   t  e  r  v  a  p  o  u  r  o  v  e  r   P  a  r  a  n  a   l   a  n   d   L  a   S   i   l   l  a   T   h  e   E   S   O   R  e  m  o   t  e   G  a   l  a  x  y   S  u  r  v  e  y   A  s   t  r  o  n  o  m   i  c  a   l   r  e  s  e  a  r  c   h   b  y   h   i  g   h  s  c   h  o  o   l   s   t  u   d  e  n   t  s
 
2
The Messenger 141
– September 2010
use light diffracted from the Airy core of the central star to cancel out the coherentlight in the outer diffraction rings. Smallsinusoidal ripples of phase added to theincoming wavefront act like a simple dif-fraction grating, creating a pair of “speck-les” that can be adjusted to cancel outdiffraction on one side of the star, butreinforcing it on the opposite side. Mathe-matically adding many of these virtualgratings together forms the resultant APPpattern, seen in Figure 2. Its effect onthe Very Large Telescope (VLT) pointspread function (PSF) is seen in the com-missioning data in Figure 3. The APPoptical element itself is shown in Figure 4prior to installation.It is important to note that every imagedobject in the eld of view — includingany faint companions and extended struc-ture — all have this new, modied APPPSF. Since energy from the Airy core isused in suppressing diffraction, thereis an effective loss of transmission of thefaint companion. We have designedthe plate to use 40% of the Airy core uxto provide diffraction suppression, butthis loss of planet ux is more than com-pensated by the much larger reductionof diffracted light from the central star. The measured throughput for the APPis 0.60 with an error of 0.02, consistentwith the design specications.Since there is no focal plane mask thatthe target star has to be aligned behind,the greatest benet for a NACO user isthat there is no alignment overhead for the APP coronagraph. The target star can bebeam-switched anywhere on the imagingarray with no impact whatsoever on the
Matthew Kenworthy
1
Sascha Quanz
2
Michael Meyer
2
Markus Kasper
3
Julien Girard
3
Rainer Lenzen
4
Johanan Codona
5
Philip Hinz
51
Leiden Observatory, the Netherlands
2
ETH Zurich, Switzerland
3
ESO
4
Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie,Heidelberg, Germany
5
University of Arizona, USA 
In April 2010, a new coronagraphic opti-cal element, called an Apodising PhasePlate (APP), was installed in NAOS–CONICA (NACO). The APP coronagraphis optimised for use at 4.05 µm withboth narrow- and broadband lters.Unlike other types of coronagraph, itrequires no alignment overhead andcan be used immediately after switchingfrom direct imaging for observing tar-gets of interest where high contrast isrequired.
 The Apodising Phase Plate (APP) is opti-mised for observations using the newlyintroduced IB4.05 lter in NACO (Roussetet al., 2003; Lenzen et al., 2003) and wehave also demonstrated its performanceat broader bandpasses around 4 µmwith the
L
;
lter (Kenworthy et al., 2010).In this article, we describe the principleof the optical element, how it can beused for NACO observations and explainits strengths and weaknesses. The goal of a coronagraph is to minimisethe diffracted light from one astronomicalsource whilst letting through as muchof the light as possible from a nearby,usually much fainter, source. The originalLyot coronagraph uses two optical ele-ments within an astronomical camera tosuppress light from the on-axis source. The image of the central star and anearby planet, for example, is formed ina focal plane (FP), where a mask blockslight from the star out to a given radius(see Figure 1). The planet is ideally dis-placed off to one side of the star, and thelight from the planet is not blocked bythis mask. Reimaging optics form a pupilplane (PP) image (often coincident withthe camera’s lter wheel) and a Lyot stopthen blocks light from the outer edgeof the re-imaged telescope pupil, beforegoing on to form the nal image usinganother optical element at the sciencedetector. Kasper et al. (2009) describedpupil-stabilised Lyot coronagraphy at4 µm with NACO for exoplanet detection. The classical Lyot design is sensitiveto the telescope’s alignment of the staron the focal plane mask and there is astrong trade-off between angular resolu-tion and achievable suppression: if theplanet is too close to the star, the planet’slight can also be blocked by the focalplane mask. Other coronagraphic designs,such as the four quadrant phase mask and phase-induced amplitude apodisa-tion, signicantly improve on the Lyotdesign, but still suffer from the tight tip-tilt alignment tolerances in the focal plane(for a review comparing many typesof coronagraph, see Guyon et al., 2006).How the APP works The Apodising Phase Plate consists of  just one optical element, rather thantwo, in the pupil plane of the telescope.It is a development of phase apodisationcoronagraphy, originally developed byJohanan Codona at the University of Ari-zona (Codona & Angel, 2004; Codona,2006) and initially tested at the 6.5-metreMMTO (Kenworthy et al., 2007). Here, we Telescopes and Instrumentation
 A New Coronagraph for NAOS–CONICA —the Apodising Phase Plate
 APP coronagraphClassical Lyot coronagraphNo focal plane mask Mask blockscentral starFocal plane (FP)Pupil plane (PP)DetectorLower spatial resolutionReduced throughputLyot stop APP opticPlanetStar
Figure 1.
A comparison of the principles used in the Apodising Phase Plate coronagraph and in a classi-cal Lyot coronagraph.
 
3
The Messenger 141
– September 2010
coronagraph’s performance. All corona-graphs represent a trade-off betweeninner working angle, planet ux through-put, and spatial resolution. In the caseof the APP, it is designed to provide dif-fraction suppression from 0.180 arcsec-onds out to 0.750 arcseconds, moving thesky background limit up to three timescloser to the central star than direct imag-ing observations. Beyond a radius of 0.750 arcseconds (the actual value varieswith target star magnitude and adaptiveoptics [AO] correction) it is preferableto use direct imaging and related subtrac-tion techniques.Using the APP with NACO The APP is used with the CONICA L27camera nominally providing a eld of viewof 28 by 28 arcseconds. However, toprevent ghost reections from the opticsinterfering with the coronagraphic mode,the APP has an optical wedge intro-duced into it. The practical result is thatthe APP can be used over the upperthird of the detector area (i.e. no restric-tions along the
 x 
-axis of the detector). There is no impact on the PSF qualityand one can beam-switch along this partof the detector in a manner identical todirect imaging observational techniques.Observing with the APP does not in-crease the overhead of observations apartfrom that due to the reduced corona-graphic throughput of 60%. If full eldcoverage around a target of interestis required, a second dataset with theeld of view rotated by 180 degreesis required to cover both hemispheresaround a target. The APP can be used in pupil-trackingmode so that the xed-pattern specklesof the telescope and instrument remainxed with respect to the orientation of the APP PSF. A combination of angulardifferential imaging and/or PSF subtrac-tion with a nearby reference star withsimilar colour and magnitude is requiredto minimise contributions from the uncor-rected seeing halo produced by theadaptive optics system and to minimiseany residual quasi-static speckles. The APP optical element is chromatic andis designed for a central wavelength of 4.05 μm, but the coronagraphic suppres-sion only degrades slowly with increas-ing bandwidth, which was seen in the
L
;
contrast curve determined during engi-neering time in April 2010.In Figure 5, we show the contrastachieved in a 30-minute integration onHIP 61460 (an F2 V star with
L
;
= 6.2 mag)using the
L
;
lter (central wavelength3.8 µm) with the observations made inpupil-tracking mode with detector inte-grations of DIT = 0.175 s, NDIT = 30 andNINT = 5, yielding ve images at differentdither positions. All images were in thelinear detector regime (approximatelyone-third full well), the DIMM seeing variedbetween 0.7 and 0.8 arcseconds, andthe airmass was less than 1.1. The con-trast curve was calculated by stackingthe images together and computing theroot mean square (rms) per pixel in thestack. Using an aperture with a radius of 5 pixels, the mean ux per pixel in thecore of the PSF was computed and thendivided by the mean ux per pixel for aplanet with a signal-to-noise ratio of 5(estimated from the rms in a similar aper-ture at a given radial separation). Theresultant
L
;
contrast curve shows that the APP is working as expected and ap-proximately as predicted from the simula-tions, and the contrasts are comparableto those from other coronagraphs. Thesteep drop of the contrast curve showsthe specic strength of the APP, as wereach a 5
σ
point source detection limit of 10 magnitudes at 0.4 arcseconds offset.
 VLT PupilVLT Apodising Phase Plate VLT PSFarcsecondsarcseconds
   l  o  g
   1   0
    i  n   t  e  n  s   i   t  y
–1–1–0.5–0.50.50.5110–1432100.50.5100–1–0.50.510 VLT APP PSF
Figure 2.
(Left) The APPphase plate pattern andits effect on the VLT point spread function.
Figure 3.
(Right) Animage of the VLT PSFtaken with the APPon NACO. The imagehas been logarithmicallyscaled for clarity.
Figure 4.
The APP optical element prior to installa-tion in CONICA. The light yellow area is the transmis-sive ZnSe and the brown area is a gold coating thataids alignment in the pupil mask wheel.
Search History:
Searching...
Result 00 of 00
00 results for result for
  • p.
  • More From This User

    Notes
    Load more